ewingsamuels | GSE

My portfolio of 30 years in the Entertainment Industry and the Information Technology Industry. From Music, the Law, Artifical Intelligence and more...

Unchecked Misconduct: the danger of dirty cops

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction:

Today, I want to delve into a topic that has plagued our society for far too long: the existence of dirty cops and the dire consequences of their unchecked misconduct. The recent case of Derek Chauvin, whose actions led to the tragic death of George Floyd and sparked international outrage and protests, serves as a chilling reminder of the dangers posed by law enforcement officers who abuse their power.

The Case of Detective Marchele Miller:

Under the Surface: Unveiling the Criminal History

Detective Marchele Miller, unlike Derek Chauvin, does not have a record of misconduct. Instead, she has a troubling history of criminal behavior and an arrest record with the City of Chandler Police Department. Yet, despite this alarming background, the State of Arizona has gone above and beyond to conceal evidence of her criminal past, leaving me to fight for justice against insurmountable odds.

CRIMINAL HISTORY AND ARREST RECORD OF DETECTIVE MARCHELE MILLER:

DetectiveMarcheleMillerCHAR-1Download

The Role of Acting Commander Matthew Siekmann:

A Betrayal of Trust and Accountability

Acting Commander Matthew Siekmann, Badge #6347, of the Professional Standards Bureau, knowingly and intentionately ignored my reporting that Detective Marchele Miller had a criminal history and an arrest record, despite the Police Department’s policy mandating an investigation and termination of such officers. Shockingly, it was later revealed that Siekmann had a personal connection to Miller, as they were friends, and he had given her high marks on her Personnel Profile in previous years, thus compromising the integrity of the investigation process.

Comparing Cases: The Derek Chauvin Trial vs. Detective Marchele Miller

The parallels between my case and the Derek Chauvin trial are striking. Both involve officers with troubling backgrounds, whose actions have had devastating consequences. However, in my case, the stakes are even higher, as the State of Arizona actively works to protect and shield officers with criminal histories from accountability.

The Path Forward: Seeking Accountability and Justice

This is a dangerous precedent that cannot be ignored. When law enforcement agencies fail to hold their own accountable, it undermines the very foundation of justice and erodes public trust in the system. It is a betrayal of the oath to serve and protect, and it puts innocent lives at risk.

Conclusion: Towards a Future of Transparency and Integrity

But despite the challenges I face, I refuse to back down. I will continue to fight for my rights and expose the corruption and misconduct that have plagued my case. I will not rest until justice is served, and those responsible are held accountable for their actions.

In the end, the fight against dirty cops is not just about seeking justice for individual victims—it is about holding the system accountable and ensuring that no one is above the law. Together, we can work towards a future where transparency, accountability, and integrity prevail.

Thank you for joining me on this journey towards justice.

Warm regards,

Ewing Samuels

The Brady List: Arizona’s Routine Practice Of NonDisclosure

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Title: The Brady List: Arizona’s Routine Practice Of NonDisclosure

Introduction: In our relentless pursuit of justice, it’s imperative to confront both the systemic flaws in the legal system and the accountability of those entrusted with upholding it. The Brady List serves as a stark reminder of the pervasive issue of prosecutorial misconduct, while recent legislative measures in California provide a roadmap for meaningful reform.

The Brady List (known as MCAO R15DD Report in the State of Arizona):

Rule-15-List-12-29-2023Download

Exposing Systemic Flaws: The Brady List The Brady List sheds light on the disturbing prevalence of prosecutorial misconduct in Arizona. By failing to disclose crucial evidence, state attorneys undermine the very principles of fairness and justice. My own experience in case CR-2016-113647 highlights the devastating impact of this misconduct, leaving the lives of my toddler son and I shattered in its wake. The Arizona Rules of Professional Conduct 3.8, Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor, Arizona Constitution, U.S. Constitution, Supreme Court of the United States in Brady v. Maryland, Giglio v. United States has all determined that “the law requires the prosecution to disclose evidence whether or not the defendant requests any such.” The language is very clear and prosecutors who knowingly violate the law should be punished severely.

Demanding Accountability: Following California’s Lead Inspired by California’s proactive stance, where legislation enacted since 2016 mandates felony penalties for prosecutors who conceal material evidence, Arizona must follow suit. By implementing similar laws, we can hold state attorneys accountable for their actions and ensure that justice is not just a lofty ideal but a tangible reality for all.

Imposing Consequences: Prison Time for Prosecutors Concealing material impeachment and exculpatory evidence cannot go unpunished. Arizona must enact measures to impose prison time on prosecutors found guilty of such misconduct. This sends a clear message that justice cannot be compromised and that every individual, regardless of their position, is held to the highest standards of integrity. If such lawlessness goes unchecked, the only way to address grievances will clearly be by street justice and laws of retribution.

Uniting for Change: Advocating for Reform Addressing both the systemic failures highlighted by the Brady List and the need for prosecutorial accountability requires collective action. Let us unite in advocating for change and demanding that lawmakers take decisive action to uphold justice for all. Together, we can ensure that no one is above the law and that every individual is afforded their fundamental rights.

Conclusion: As we strive for justice, let us remain steadfast in our commitment to reforming Arizona’s legal system. By exposing systemic flaws, demanding accountability, and advocating for change, we can create a future where fairness and integrity prevail. Together, we can pave the way for a legal system that truly serves the interests of justice for all.

Behind the Badge: Dark Secrets of Detective Marchele Miller

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

“Nothing dissolves dishonesty faster than the simple act of revealing the truth.”

David R. Hawkins (Power vs. Force)

Introduction: A Dark Day in Phoenix

Today, I am compelled to share a story that cuts deep into the fabric of justice. It’s a tale of betrayal, corruption, and the abuse of power—a story that has haunted me since the fateful day of March 21, 2016, in my own home in Phoenix, Arizona.

The Deception Unraveled: Detective Marchele Miller’s Betrayal

On that day, Detective Marchele Miller crossed a line that should never have been breached. She, a sworn officer of the law, was supposed to protect and serve. Instead, she orchestrated a web of deceit, fabricating evidence, and manipulating facts to fit a narrative that would serve her own agenda.

A Culture of Corruption: Systemic Failures Exposed

Detective Miller’s actions were not merely misguided; they were malicious. She went above and beyond to conceal evidence, omit crucial facts, and even resorted to kidnapping my innocent 5-year-old child, all in a bid to further her twisted version of events.

The Dark Past: Revealing Detective Miller’s Criminal History

What makes this betrayal all the more egregious is the revelation of Detective Marchele Miller’s own criminal history. Since her arrest on February 23, 2012, by the City of Chandler Police Department, she has a record tainted with racism, deception, and a tenacity for violence. This report serves as a glaring indication of her propensity for dishonesty—a trait that should have disqualified her from serving in law enforcement. This report is also concealed from the public, nowhere on the Rule 15 Arizona Disclosure Database, and the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office knowingly violates legal, federal and international laws of Due Process, Equal Protection and Fair Trial. Mr. Samuels never had a criminal record, until a criminal named Detective Marchele Miller gave him one.

CRIMINAL HISTORY AND ARREST RECORD OF MARCHELE MILLER – FEBRUARY 23, 2012 – CHANDLER POLICE DEPARTMENT – REPORT # 12-01-9763:

DetectiveMarcheleMillerCHARDownload

The Series Continues: Exploring Case CR-2016-113647

This blog post is just one installment in a series shedding light on the injustices surrounding my case, CR-2016-113647, State of Arizona vs. Ewing Samuels. Stay tuned for further revelations and insights into the systemic failures that allowed such misconduct to occur.

Demanding Justice: Refusing to Stay Silent

As a software engineer and a business consultant, I’ve always believed in the power of facts and evidence. But when those entrusted with upholding justice become the very architects of injustice, it shakes the foundation of our society to its core. And as a cyber security expert with a team around the globe, it is my utmost duty and now life task to go after and expose criminals cloaked in the color of authority.

The Path Forward: Seeking Accountability and Reform

It’s clear to me now that Detective Miller was not acting alone. Her actions point to a systemic failure—a culture of corruption that allows such misconduct to flourish unchecked. But let me be unequivocal: I will not rest until justice is served.

The Call to Action: Standing Against Police Misconduct

The evidence against Detective Miller is irrefutable. She knowingly filed false reports, engaged in criminal conspiracy, and deprived me of my rights under the color of law. And as a father, the kidnapping of my child is an unforgivable transgression that I will never forget.

A Message to Detective Marchele Miller: Accountability Beckons

But this is not just my story—it’s a story that resonates with countless others who have been victims of police misconduct and abuse of power. It’s a call to action—a demand for accountability, transparency, and reform within our law enforcement agencies. There is no forgive and forget in the law – there is only the delivering of pains, penalties and punishment.

I refuse to be silenced. I refuse to let Detective Miller’s actions go unpunished. And I refuse to let my voice be drowned out by the deafening silence of complicity.

Conclusion: The Triumph of Truth and Justice

To Detective Marchele Miller, I have one message: your days of deceit are numbered. The truth will prevail, and justice will be served.

Sincerely,

Ewing Samuels

User

You

The Significance & Meaning of good friday

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Reflecting on the Significance of Good Friday

As we approach the solemn observance of Good Friday, I find myself compelled to delve into the profound meaning behind this sacred day in the Christian calendar. Good Friday, falling on the Friday before Easter Sunday, is a time for devout reflection on the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ.

Understanding the Historical Context

Since the early days of Christianity, Good Friday has been a day of somber contemplation, penance, and fasting. Its name itself, “Good Friday,” may seem paradoxical given the sorrowful events it commemorates. In German, it is known as “Karfreitag,” meaning “Sorrowful Friday,” which aptly captures the essence of this day.

Tracing the Origins

Central to the observance of Good Friday is the remembrance of Jesus’ last meal with his disciples, often understood as a Passover seder. This places the date of Jesus’ death on the 15th day of Nisan in the Jewish calendar, corresponding to April 7 in the Gregorian calendar. However, Christians do not adhere to a fixed date for commemorating Good Friday; instead, it falls between March 20 and April 23, aligning with the Jewish lunisolar calendar. It truly appears as whatever is convenient is done.

Navigating the Theological Debate

The historical background of Good Friday is rich with theological significance. In the early centuries of Christianity, there was a debate about whether to commemorate Jesus’ death and Resurrection together or separately. Eventually, Easter emerged as the celebration of Christ’s Resurrection, marking a pivotal event in Christian faith.

Evolution of Liturgical Observance

The liturgical observance of Good Friday has evolved over time. In the Roman Catholic Church, Mass is not celebrated on this day, but a solemn liturgy is performed, including the reading of the Gospel Passion narrative and the adoration of the cross. The Three Hour Service, introduced in the 17th century, offers a meditative reflection on Jesus’ “Seven Last Words on the Cross.”

Across Denominational Traditions

Across various Christian denominations, Good Friday is a day of worship and reflection. Anglican and Protestant traditions may include the reception of the “reserved sacrament” and solemn liturgical services. While Christmas and Easter have become intertwined with secular customs, Good Friday retains its deeply religious significance.

Conclusion: Embracing Personal Reflection

As we approach the commemoration of Good Friday, I am reminded not only of the profound sacrifice of Jesus Christ but also of my own journey of faith. For me, this day transcends mere tradition; it serves as an opportunity for deep introspection and personal reflection.

Having distanced myself from formal religious practice for over two decades (since my mother’s passing in 2000), I find myself drawn to question the relevance of certain traditions imposed by institutionalized religion. Born in Belize, Central America, I embrace my heritage and seek to align my spiritual practices with the values and beliefs that resonate with my cultural roots.

Good Friday, with its solemnity and contemplative atmosphere, offers a moment of pause amidst the busyness of life. It prompts me to examine my beliefs, values, and the impact of my actions on others. In this reflection, I find a renewed sense of connection with the divine and a reaffirmation of my commitment to living a life guided by compassion, integrity, and empathy.

As we navigate the complexities of faith and tradition, may we all find moments of clarity and understanding. May the spirit of Good Friday inspire us to embrace authenticity, seek truth, and extend love and kindness to all beings.

Warm regards,

Ewing Samuels

Rethinking the American Jury System: Pillars of injustice

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction: Challenging the Pillars of Justice

Today, we embark on a journey into the heart of one of its most cherished institutions: the jury system. But as we peel back the layers of history and tradition, we must confront a fundamental question: does this system still serve the ideals of justice in our modern world? Join me as we delve into the complexities and controversies surrounding the American jury system, and dare to envision a more equitable path forward.

The Problem of Bias: A Flawed Foundation

The jury system, often hailed as the hallmark of democracy, traces its roots back to medieval England under King Henry II. Fast forward to today, and the United States stands virtually alone in championing this centuries-old tradition. But is it time to reconsider our allegiance to the jury trial?

Confirmation Bias and Discriminatory Practices

Let’s address the elephant in the courtroom: bias. The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to an “impartial jury,” but let’s face it, folks, impartiality is a lofty ideal that often falls short in reality. Voir dire, the process of jury selection, has become a battlefield where attorneys strategically weed out jurors whose views don’t align with their case. It’s less about fairness and more about gaining a strategic advantage.

Prosecutorial Influence and Government Prestige

But wait, there’s more. Prosecutors, armed with the prestige of the government, often wield their influence to sway jurors towards wrongful and unlawful convictions. This misuse of power further undermines the impartiality of the jury system and erodes public trust in the justice system.

Media Influence: A Modern Challenge

Confirmation bias, that pesky tendency to cherry-pick information that confirms our preconceived beliefs, runs rampant in the jury box. Studies have shown that jurors are influenced by everything from political ideology to racial biases. And let’s not forget about peremptory challenges, the legal loophole that’s been used to systematically exclude minorities from juries. It’s a system ripe for exploitation and in desperate need of reform.

Competency: The Jury’s Achilles’ Heel

Let’s talk about the competency conundrum. Imagine this: everyday citizens, often with no legal background, tasked with deciphering the complexities of the law. It’s like expecting a ship captain to navigate a storm without a compass. The result? Verdicts that may be swayed more by bewilderment than clarity. But it’s not just about comprehension; it’s also about exclusion. Prospective jurors with relevant expertise are often sidelined during voir dire because they “know too much.” This leaves juries comprised of well-meaning individuals who may lack the fundamental understanding needed to make informed decisions.

Examples of Questionable Convictions from Juries

  1. The Central Park Five (1989): In one of the most notorious cases of prosecutorial misconduct, five Black and Latino teenagers were wrongfully convicted of raping a jogger in Central Park, New York City. The prosecution, led by Linda Fairstein, presented a narrative of guilt despite lack of physical evidence, coerced confessions, and DNA evidence that later exonerated the defendants. Their convictions were vacated in 2002 after the real perpetrator confessed.
  2. The West Memphis Three (1993): Three teenagers—Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin, and Jessie Misskelley Jr.—were convicted of murdering three young boys in Arkansas. The prosecution relied heavily on coerced confessions and circumstantial evidence, while ignoring potentially exculpatory evidence. The case garnered widespread attention, and in 2011, after new DNA evidence emerged, the defendants entered Alford pleas and were released from prison.
  3. The Duke Lacrosse Case (2006): Three members of the Duke University lacrosse team were accused of raping a stripper at a team party. The district attorney, Mike Nifong, pursued charges despite inconsistencies in the accuser’s story and lack of DNA evidence linking the defendants to the alleged assault. The case eventually fell apart, and the defendants were declared innocent. Nifong was disbarred for his misconduct.
  4. The Case of Cameron Todd Willingham (1991): Willingham was convicted of arson and murder in Texas after a house fire killed his three young daughters. Prosecutors relied on faulty forensic evidence to secure the conviction, despite expert opinions suggesting the fire was accidental. Willingham was executed in 2004, but subsequent investigations raised serious doubts about his guilt, leading to widespread criticism of the prosecution’s tactics.

These cases serve as stark reminders of the fallibility of the justice system and the potential for prosecutors to sway juries with misleading narratives and incomplete evidence. They underscore the importance of vigilance in safeguarding the rights of the accused and ensuring that justice is truly served.

Conclusion: Towards a More Just System

In conclusion, folks, the American jury system, while noble in theory, is in dire need of a reality check. Bias, prosecutorial influence, media influence, and incompetence are just a few of the hurdles we face. It’s time to roll up our sleeves, folks, and start reimagining a justice system that truly serves the people.

Until next time,

Ewing Samuels

Unveiling Judicial Bias: A Call to Action for Justice

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

Today, I want to address a critical issue plaguing our justice system: judicial bias. As someone who has experienced the injustices firsthand, I am deeply troubled by the erosion of fair trial principles in state courts across the United States. From favoritism towards the prosecution to blatant antagonism towards defendants, it’s clear that the neutrality requirement enshrined in the United States Constitution is being trampled upon.

The Prosecution’s Preferential Treatment

One of the most alarming manifestations of judicial bias is the preferential treatment given to the prosecution. In numerous cases, judges have exhibited a propensity to side with prosecutors, often at the expense of defendants’ rights. This bias can manifest in various forms, from allowing questionable evidence to be admitted to the courtroom to imposing disproportionately harsh sentences.

Antagonism Towards Defendants

Equally troubling is the antagonism displayed towards defendants. Instead of serving as impartial arbiters of the law, some judges seem to view defendants with suspicion and disdain. This predisposition can lead to rushed judgments, denial of crucial evidence, and an overall denial of the right to a fair trial.

Rooted in White Supremacy

Adding to the complexity of the issue is the deeply ingrained pattern, practice, and customs rooted in white supremacy within the judiciary. This insidious influence perpetuates systemic biases that disproportionately affect marginalized communities. State court judges, emboldened by these entrenched beliefs, often operate under the illusion of being unaccountable for their actions, even in cases of wrongful and unlawful convictions. It is an insane asylum, when the administrators of law knowingly violate the law holding others to account, but believe that they can NEVER be accountable for their own actions and inactions, costing irreparable harm to individuals’ lives.

Historical Precedents

Throughout history, there have been instances where state court judges have been arrested or convicted, casting doubt on the integrity of their judgments. These cases serve as stark reminders of the dangers of unchecked judicial power and the need for robust oversight mechanisms. Examples of such judges for factual reference are Josef Altstötter, Noel Arrigo, Mark Ciavarella, Jacques Delisle, Thomas J. Maloney, Ernst Pöhner, Oswald Rothaug are just to name a few.

The Legal Framework: 28 U.S. Code § 144

It’s crucial to recognize the legal framework designed to address judicial bias. 28 U.S. Code § 144 stipulates procedures for challenging the bias or prejudice of a judge. However, the effectiveness of these mechanisms is often hindered by institutional barriers and a reluctance to confront entrenched biases within the judiciary.

The Issue of Absolute Immunity

Moreover, the concept of “absolute immunity” further exacerbates the issue of judicial accountability. Judges are granted near-untouchable status, shielded from any repercussions for their actions, no matter how reckless or unjust. This lack of accountability undermines the very foundation of our legal system and erodes public trust in the judiciary.

A Call to Action

It’s imperative that we address these issues head-on. The integrity of our justice system depends on it. We must demand accountability from judges, advocate for reforms that promote fairness and impartiality, and hold those responsible for judicial bias to account.

Conclusion

As I continue my fight for justice, I urge you to join me in speaking out against judicial bias and standing up for the rights enshrined in the Constitution. Together, we can strive towards a legal system that upholds the principles of equality, fairness, and justice for all.

Sincerely,

Ewing Samuels

Prosecutorial Misconduct: Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction: Shedding Light on a Grave Injustice

Today, I want to delve into a topic that strikes at the very heart of our justice system: prosecutorial misconduct. As a man who has experienced firsthand the unjust consequences of such actions, I am compelled to shed light on this grave issue.

Understanding Prosecutorial Misconduct

At its core, prosecutorial misconduct is a form of deprivation of rights under the color of law, as outlined in Title 18, Statute 242. When prosecutors, armed with the authority of the state, knowingly flout the rules, manipulate evidence, and subvert the truth, they wield immense power to destroy lives.

Historical Perspective: Grave Injustices of the Past

Throughout history, we’ve witnessed egregious cases where prosecutors, driven by ambition or prejudice, have sent innocent individuals to languish behind bars for years. These wrongful and unlawful convictions tear families apart, shatter dreams, and erode trust in our legal system.

Manifestations of Misconduct

But what exactly constitutes prosecutorial misconduct? It can take many forms, from withholding exculpatory evidence to coercing witnesses or fabricating testimony. These actions not only pervert the course of justice but also inflict irreparable harm on those ensnared in the system.

The Consequences of Inaction

Moreover, prosecutorial misconduct often goes unchecked, shielded by a veil of immunity and institutional inertia. Even when exposed, the consequences for offending prosecutors are often minimal, if any. This lack of accountability only emboldens further abuses of power.

Calls for Reform

As we confront this pervasive issue, it’s crucial to recognize the broader implications. Prosecutorial misconduct undermines the very principles of fairness and equality that form the cornerstone of our legal system. It perpetuates systemic injustices and perpetuates cycles of poverty, incarceration, and despair.

Path to Justice: Demanding Accountability

So, what can be done to address this scourge? First and foremost, we must demand greater transparency and accountability from our prosecutors. They must be held to the highest ethical standards and held to account when they betray the public trust. They must be dealt with by harsh pains, penalties and punishment as one instance indicates and implicates more than most likely a pattern in practice that is habitual and routine, business as usual.

Advocating for Change

Additionally, we must advocate for reforms that bolster oversight, promote prosecutorial integrity, and safeguard the rights of the accused. This includes measures such as mandatory disclosure of evidence, expedited reviews when found, independent review boards, and increased training on ethics and constitutional law.

Conclusion: The Pursuit of Truth and Justice

Ultimately, combating prosecutorial misconduct requires a collective effort from all stakeholders – lawmakers, judges, law enforcement, and citizens alike. We must never lose sight of the fact that justice delayed is justice denied – and that includes justice for those wrongfully convicted due to prosecutorial misconduct.

In closing, let us remember that the pursuit of justice demands vigilance, courage, and unwavering commitment to truth and fairness. Together, we can work towards a future where prosecutorial misconduct is not just a footnote in history but a relic of a bygone era.

In the pursuit of truth and justice,

Ewing Samuels

Policing in America: A History of Systemic Injustice

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Today, we explore the complex history of policing in America, shedding light on its roots in oppression and its enduring impact on marginalized communities.

Origins of Policing in America: From its inception, policing in America has been intertwined with systems of oppression. The earliest forms of policing can be traced back to slave patrols in the South during the 18th and 19th centuries. These patrols were tasked with enforcing laws that upheld the institution of slavery, maintaining control over enslaved people, and preventing revolts.

Jim Crow Era and Racial Segregation: The Jim Crow era further entrenched discriminatory policing practices. Segregation laws relegated African Americans to second-class citizenship, and law enforcement agencies were complicit in upholding these racist policies. From brutal enforcement of segregation laws to turning a blind eye to racially motivated violence, police played a central role in perpetuating racial injustice.

Reconstruction Era: During the Reconstruction Era following the Civil War, efforts were made to establish equality and protect the rights of newly freed African Americans. However, these gains were short-lived as white supremacist groups such as the Ku Klux Klan terrorized Black communities with impunity. Law enforcement often turned a blind eye to these acts of violence, contributing to the systemic disenfranchisement of African Americans.

Civil Rights Movement and Police Brutality: During the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s, police brutality against peaceful protesters became a flashpoint in the fight for racial equality. Images of law enforcement officers using excessive force, such as the violent crackdown on the marchers in Selma, Alabama, shocked the nation and galvanized support for the movement.

War on Drugs and Mass Incarceration: The War on Drugs, launched in the 1980s, ushered in an era of aggressive policing tactics that disproportionately targeted communities of color. Draconian drug laws led to mass incarceration, with Black and Brown individuals bearing the brunt of harsh sentencing and discriminatory policing practices. Despite similar rates of drug use across racial groups, people of color are far more likely to be arrested and incarcerated for drug offenses.

Militarization of Police and Police Accountability: In recent decades, the militarization of police forces has further escalated tensions between law enforcement and the communities they serve. The use of military-grade equipment and tactics has intensified police violence and eroded trust among marginalized communities. Furthermore, the lack of police accountability has allowed officers to act with impunity, perpetuating cycles of injustice.

Conclusion: The history of policing in America is fraught with systemic injustice and oppression. From its origins in slave patrols to the present-day militarization of police forces, law enforcement has consistently failed to uphold the rights and dignity of all citizens. Here we are committed to advocating for meaningful reform and accountability within the criminal justice system. It is only through acknowledging the past and confronting the present that we can strive towards a more just and equitable future for all. Join us in the fight for justice.

Regards,

Ewing Samuels

Unearthing Arizona: Tracing Roots of Government Abuse and White Supremacy

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

In the vast tapestry of American history, certain threads are woven with complexity and nuance, revealing uncomfortable truths about the past and present. One such thread leads us to the State of Arizona, a land of stunning landscapes and vibrant cultures, but also a place marked by a troubling legacy of government abuse and entrenched white supremacy.

Founding and Troubling Past: Arizona’s origins trace back to its founding after the Civil War, a period of profound upheaval and redefinition in American society. Founded in 1863, Arizona Territory emerged from the crucible of post-war reconstruction. It’s crucial to acknowledge that Arizona was established by individuals who had ties to the Confederacy, the faction that fought to preserve slavery and secede from the Union. Many of these Confederate sympathizers migrated westward after the South’s defeat, seeking new opportunities in the untamed territories beyond.

Present-Day Reflections: The echoes of Arizona’s troubled past reverberate into the present, shaping its political landscape and law enforcement practices. While progress has been made, the shadows of white supremacy still loom large, influencing policies and attitudes in subtle yet insidious ways.

Government Abuse of Power: Throughout its history, Arizona has grappled with instances of government abuse of power, disproportionately impacting marginalized communities, including Native American and Latino populations. From discriminatory laws to controversial law enforcement tactics, there’s a troubling pattern of systemic injustice that cannot be ignored.

Roots of White Supremacy: To understand Arizona’s present-day behaviors, one must confront the uncomfortable truth of its roots in white supremacy. This isn’t to say that every Arizonan subscribes to such beliefs, but rather to acknowledge the historical forces that have shaped the state’s identity and institutions.

Arrests and Convictions: Among the notable instances of government abuse, Arizona has witnessed the arrest and conviction of state authorities, including governors and law enforcement figures, J. Fife Symington III and Evan Mecham, both of whom faced legal troubles during their time in office. But, perhaps one of the most infamous cases is that of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, whose tenure was marred by accusations of racial profiling, abuse of power, and defiance of court orders. Arpaio’s actions exemplified the deep-seated issues within Arizona’s law enforcement system, underscoring the need for accountability and reform. It also highlights the vulnerability of Arizona’s political system to corruption and abuse of power.

Moving Forward: Recognizing Arizona’s troubled past is the first step toward building a more just and equitable future. It requires honest conversations, meaningful reforms, and a commitment to dismantling systems of oppression. Only by confronting the legacies of white supremacy head-on can Arizona truly fulfill its promise as a land of opportunity and equality for all. But who are we really kidding? The system is working perfectly fine, as it was designed.

In conclusion, the State of Arizona stands at a crossroads, where its history converges with its present reality. By acknowledging the uncomfortable truths of its founding and confronting the lingering specter of white supremacy, Arizona has the opportunity to forge a new path forward, one rooted in justice, equality, and respect for all its inhabitants. Or continue down the path of a State that will sooner or later find itself in the dustpan of history and its Authority figures with indictments and warrants for their arrests, no matter how old they are enjoying retirement while hundreds, possibly thousands suffer in torment at their actions and inactions while they knowingly violated Constitutional, legal and human rights.

Reflections on March 21, 2016: A Journey to Justice

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

A Journey Through Adversity: Reflecting on the Anniversary of a Life-Altering Incident

Introduction: A Day etched in Memory

Today marks a significant anniversary for me, one that forever altered the course of me and my child’s life and brought into sharp focus the realities of the American justice system. It was on this day, March 21, 2016, in Phoenix, Arizona, that I found myself thrust into a harrowing ordeal that tested my resilience and challenged my faith in the very institutions meant to uphold justice.

Chapter 1: Unexpected Turns: From San Francisco to Phoenix

After relocating back to Phoenix from San Francisco just five days prior, I was confronted with a sudden and inexplicable breakup with my girlfriend, whom was 10 years older than I. What followed was a sequence of events that defied reason and shook me to my core.

Chapter 2: Confrontation and Chaos: A Violent Morning

In the confines of my legally leased private residence, I faced a terrifying confrontation with my ex-girlfriend’s son—a 25-year-old with a troubled past, ensnared in the grip of crack-cocaine, methamphetimine and alcohol addiction and gang affiliations. In the early hours of that fateful morning, he unleashed a violent assault that threatened the safety of my child and myself. Desperate to protect us, I was compelled to take drastic action, resulting in a tragic outcome.

Chapter 3: Betrayal and Injustice: Twists in the Narrative

In the aftermath, I turned to law enforcement, expecting justice to prevail. Instead, my trust was shattered as the narrative was twisted by corrupt forces within the system. A tainted investigation led to my arrest, marking the beginning of a grueling legal battle that would span years.

Chapter 4: Uncovering Truth: The Journey to Justice

Through unwavering determination and a steadfast commitment to truth, I navigated the labyrinth of the legal system, only to uncover a web of deceit and prejudice. Documents meant to incriminate me ultimately served as evidence of a larger conspiracy—one rooted in bigotry, racism, discrimination, xenophobia, and the flagrant abuse of state power.

Conclusion: Resilience and Renewal

This ordeal, spanning over seven years of confinement and legal strife, has been a crucible of transformation. It has tested my faith, challenged my beliefs, and forced me to confront the harsh realities of institutional bias. Yet, amidst the turmoil, I have emerged stronger, armed with a newfound resolve to seek justice and expose systemic injustices wherever they may lurk.

Epilogue: The Journey Continues

As I reflect on this solemn anniversary, I am reminded of the enduring importance of accountability, integrity, and the pursuit of truth. My journey serves as a testament to the resilience of the human spirit in the face of adversity, and a stark reminder of the work that remains to be done in the fight for equity and justice.

In solidarity,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III