ewingsamuels | GSE

My portfolio of 30 years in the Entertainment Industry and the Information Technology Industry. From Music, the Law, Artifical Intelligence and more...

Incompetence, Ineptitude And Injustice in Arizona Government

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Unearthing the Issue

In April 2024, the State of Arizona found itself confronting a critical flaw within its Department of Child Safety (DCS) system. The discovery revealed a troubling reality: judges were rendering decisions regarding child removals without access to crucial information.

Attorney General’s Call to Action

Prompted by this revelation, Attorney General Kris Mayes initiated a review of more than 650 closed cases. The aim? To determine whether undisclosed documents could have influenced the outcomes. The stakes were high, with the potential for overturned decisions concerning parental rights, guardianships, or adoptions.

Assessing the Impact

Assistant Attorney General Kirsten Wright sent letters to presiding judges in all 15 counties, urging them to suspend action on pending cases related to child placement. Initial assessments suggested that a staggering 3,800 juvenile dependency cases statewide may be affected. The magnitude of the situation demanded a comprehensive approach.

A Case-by-Case Evaluation

With thousands of cases under scrutiny, a meticulous examination was underway. Each case would be evaluated individually to determine the significance of any undisclosed documents. The goal? To ascertain whether errors in disclosure warranted reopening cases and potentially reversing prior decisions.

Accountability and Responsibility

As investigations unfolded, blame for the systemic issue was directed at the previous administration. Governor Katie Hobbs and DCS Director David Lujan held former Governor Doug Ducey and his DCS appointee, Michael Faust, accountable for the flawed system. The failure to ensure proper document disclosure was deemed unacceptable.

Doug Ducey
Michael Faust
Mark Brnovich

Arizona Revised Statute (ARS) Title 13, Criminal Code § 13-105 defines criminal negligence as when someone fails to recognize a substantial and unjustifiable risk that a result will occur or a circumstance exists. The risk must be of such a nature and degree that the failure to perceive it constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would observe in the situation.

The State law itself indicates and implicates Former Governor Doug Ducey, Former Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich and Michael Faust is in violation of Arizona Revised Statute (ARS) Title 13, Criminal Code § 13-105. In a state that likes to jump the gun and charge people with a crime, it is a wonder how many people have to suffer at these criminogenic dirtbags in thirst for power.

Technical Challenges and Remedial Measures

The problem stemmed from a system implemented in 2021 by DCS to track all documents. Known as Guardian, it was billed as a replacement for CHILDS, the Children’s Information Library and Data Source, in place since 1997. Despite its promise, Guardian faced its own set of challenges, including delays in payments to foster parents and the recent revelation of undisclosed documents.

Behind the scenes, efforts were made to address the technical intricacies of the flawed system. Lujan shed light on the complexities, highlighting the challenges in ensuring the accurate filing of reports from external service providers. Despite recent fixes, concerns lingered about the system’s efficacy.

Conclusion: Upholding Accountability and Safeguarding Children

In conclusion, the recent developments underscored the ongoing commitment of Arizona officials to safeguarding the welfare of children. Despite facing significant challenges, steps were being taken to strengthen oversight and uphold accountability. As the state forged ahead, ensuring the integrity of the child protection system remained paramount. There are clear facts and inicators that the State of Arizona have more than most likely damaged the welfare of thousands of children and violated families since 1997. This calls for a serious Federal and International investigation of kidnapping and child abductions through State Government.

Thank you for your continued support and engagement as we navigate these critical issues together.

Warm regards,

Ewing Samuels

Unmasking the Charade: The Illusion of Reform in Arizona’s Child Welfare

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction: A Cloak of Deception

Arizona’s child welfare system stands exposed, its flaws laid bare for all to see. Governor Jan Brewer’s ostensible initiative to overhaul the system rings hollow in the face of entrenched failures and bureaucratic malaise. As the state convenes a special legislative session, the façade of reform belies a deeper truth: the perpetuation of a broken system under a different guise. This article dismantles the illusion of change, exposing the true motives behind Arizona’s so-called child welfare reforms.

The Theatre of Reform: Smoke and Mirrors

Behind the grandiose rhetoric of reform lies a stark reality: the Arizona Department of Child Safety (AZDCS) is little more than a rebranded version of its failed predecessor. Governor Brewer’s purported commitment to child safety rings hollow in light of the systemic failures that have plagued the state’s child welfare apparatus for decades. As the state embarks on yet another round of bureaucratic reshuffling, the fundamental issues remain unaddressed, relegated to the shadows by a superficial veneer of change.

A System Betrayed: The Legacy of Neglect

The legacy of “neglect” and mismanagement within Arizona’s child welfare system is undeniable. From the staggering backlog of 6,600 uninvestigated cases to the systemic failures that have endangered countless children, the state’s track record speaks for itself. Governor Brewer’s attempt to rebrand the agency as a beacon of child safety is a cruel irony, a slap in the face to the countless families who have suffered at the hands of a broken system.

The Truth Unveiled: Exposing the Agenda

Amidst the spectacle of reform, the true agenda behind Governor Brewer’s initiative comes into focus. By perpetuating the illusion of change, the state seeks to deflect attention from its own failures and evade accountability for the systemic injustices that continue to plague Arizona’s most vulnerable children. Behind the façade of reform lies a more insidious truth: the preservation of a status quo that serves the interests of the powerful at the expense of the powerless.

Complicity Unveiled: The Role of the Attorney General

Within the intricate web of Arizona’s bureaucratic apparatus, the Attorney General’s Office emerges as a formidable guardian of the Arizona Department of Child Safety (AZDCS). Tasked ostensibly with upholding justice, this office often assumes the role of protector, shielding AZDCS from scrutiny and shielding its agents from accountability.

Defending the Indefensible: Protecting AZDCS at All Costs

When individuals like myself challenge the actions of AZDCS, the Attorney General’s Office becomes their staunch defender. Employing tactics of intimidation, threats, deception and obfuscation, they seek to safeguard AZDCS from the consequences of its actions. Through acts of perjury and slander, they silence dissent and perpetuate the illusion of infallibility surrounding AZDCS.The Arizona Attorney General’s Office is complicit in numerous crimes and crimes against children with knowledge and evidence within its posession. The Department of Justice needs to investigate this agency. There are clear crimes and human rights violations that can be taken up in the international courts.

An Active Participant in Injustice

In their zealous defense of AZDCS, the Attorney General’s Office becomes complicit in the systemic injustices that plague Arizona’s child welfare system. By prioritizing the preservation of power over the pursuit of truth and justice, they betray the very principles they are sworn to uphold. Victims are left to navigate a landscape of deceit and betrayal, denied the justice they rightfully deserve.

Conclusion: A Call to Action

As Arizona embarks on yet another round of bureaucratic reshuffling, it is imperative that we see through the illusion of reform and demand real accountability for the systemic failures that have endangered countless children. Governor Brewer’s attempt to rebrand the Arizona Department of Child Safety is a cynical ploy, designed to placate public outrage while perpetuating the very system that has failed so many. It is time to unmask the charade of reform and demand real change for Arizona’s children.

Truthfully,

Ewing Samuels

The Harrowing Reality of Kidnapping: A Personal Account of Injustice in Arizona

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction:

Kidnapping is a crime that strikes fear into the hearts of families worldwide. It’s a violation of the most fundamental human rights, tearing loved ones apart and leaving lasting scars. However, what happens when the perpetrators wear badges and operate under the guise of law enforcement? This is the chilling reality that I faced when my son was taken from me by authorities in the State of Arizona.

The Facts of Kidnapping:

Kidnapping, as defined by both state and federal statutes, involves the unlawful transportation, restraint, or confinement of an individual against their will. It’s a grave offense that carries severe penalties, rightfully so given its impact on victims and their families.

State and federal laws provide clear guidelines on what constitutes kidnapping and outline the consequences for those found guilty. These laws are meant to protect individuals from such heinous acts and ensure justice is served.

18 U.S. Code § 1201 – Kidnapping

(a) Whoever unlawfully seizes, confines, inveigles, decoys, kidnaps, abducts, or carries away and holds for ransom or reward or otherwise any person, except in the case of a minor by the parent thereof, when—

(2) any such act against the person is done within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States;

(c) If two or more persons conspire to violate this section and one or more of such persons do any overt act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life.

The Arizona Incident:

On March 21, 2016, I experienced every parent’s worst nightmare when my 5-year-old son was taken from me by authorities in Arizona. Despite having evidence to the contrary, including proof of proper care and guardianship, my son was unjustly deemed to be in “neglectful” conditions.

Detective Marchele Miller, Detective Christopher Gitsch, Officer Todd Stevens, and Sergeant Heather Howell Maldonado, and the City of Phoenix Police Department, along with individuals from the Arizona Department of Child Safety, conspired to fabricate evidence and unlawfully separate a father from his child. Their actions were not only morally reprehensible but also constituted a blatant violation of my rights as a parent. I have even more substantive documents on the Arizona Department of Child Safety as this State agency, the year prior, was directly involved and responsible for the rape and molestation of over 500 children within state custody and tried to cover up these crimes by threatening anyone of reporting this to the media. The proof of the State changing the name from CPS to DCS indicates and implicates serious wrongdoing and cover-up.

The Cover-Up:

What makes this case even more disturbing is the blatant cover-up orchestrated by those involved. Instead of upholding the law and protecting the innocent, law enforcement officers and child safety officials chose to manipulate documents, fabricate evidence, and conspire against my legal rights.

The irrefutable evidence I possess exposes the extent of their wrongdoing, highlighting a systemic failure within the justice system to hold those in positions of power accountable for their actions. I filed the Motion For Judicial Notice, pursuant to Arizona Rules of Evidence 201, as indicated below, yet NO judge at the Superior Court of Maricopa County has answered this, even though their own state court rules and Arizona Constitution indicate the Court must answer motions in 30 days. It’s 2 years now. The record is the proof.

Seeking Justice:

In the face of such injustice, I am determined to assert my legal, constitutional, and human rights. Armed with undeniable proof of the malicious intent behind my son’s abduction, I am fighting tirelessly to bring those responsible to justice and reunite with my child.

Convention on the Rights of the Child: (United Nations)

SPECIAL NOTE: The United States has not ratified the CRC despite its active role in drafting the treaty.

Article 9

1. States Parties shall ensure that a child shall not be separated from his or her parents against their will, except when competent authorities subject to judicial review determine, in accordance with applicable law and procedures, that such separation is necessary for the best interests of the child. 

Conclusion:

My story serves as a sobering reminder of the dark realities of kidnapping, particularly when perpetrated by those entrusted with upholding the law. It underscores the importance of holding individuals and institutions accountable for their actions and fighting for justice in the face of adversity.

As I continue my quest for truth and justice, stand in solidarity with me, hoping for a resolution that brings healing and closure to my family. It’s imperative that we shine a light on cases like his, ensuring that the voices of victims are heard and that the perpetrators of such egregious crimes are held accountable. I will not rest until.

Regards,

Ewing Samuels

The Paradox of Immunity: Legal Safeguards for Government Officials

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

In a world where the principle of “no one is above the law” stands as a fundamental tenet of justice, the concept of immunity for government officials presents a paradox. While the law ostensibly applies equally to all, certain individuals within the government are shielded by legal doctrines that afford them protection from prosecution or civil suits, even in the face of compelling evidence of wrongdoing. Let’s delve into the intricate landscape of immunity, particularly in the United States, and explore its implications on accountability and justice.

Understanding Immunity:

Immunity, in the context of government officials, comes in various forms, each tailored to specific roles within the judicial system. Among the most notable are qualified immunity for police officers and absolute immunity for prosecutors and judges.

  • Qualified Immunity: This doctrine shields law enforcement officers from civil liability for actions performed in the line of duty, unless their conduct violates clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. Essentially, it provides a buffer against frivolous lawsuits but has often been criticized for shielding officers from accountability, even in cases of egregious misconduct.
  • Absolute Immunity: Unlike qualified immunity, which is a defense against civil suits, absolute immunity offers broader protection, typically extended to prosecutors and judges. It grants them immunity from civil liability for actions performed within the scope of their official duties, safeguarding them from being sued for damages arising from their prosecutorial or judicial functions.

Implications of Immunity:

While immunity serves to protect government officials from the burden of constant litigation and personal liability, it can also create a perception of impunity. When individuals entrusted with upholding the law are shielded from accountability, it undermines public trust in the justice system and fosters a sense of injustice among those who feel wronged by official misconduct.

Examples of Retribution:

Instances abound where individuals, disillusioned by the perceived impunity of government officials, have taken matters into their own hands in pursuit of retribution. Take, for example, cases where victims of police brutality, denied recourse through legal channels due to qualified immunity, resort to public protests or even retaliatory violence as a means of seeking justice.

Similarly, in the realm of prosecutorial misconduct, where absolute immunity often protects prosecutors from civil liability, instances of wrongful convictions or egregious abuses of power have led to public outrage and, in some cases, vigilantism against those perceived to have evaded accountability.

Seeking Reform:

The issue of immunity for government officials is a complex one, balancing the need to protect individuals performing essential public functions with the imperative of holding them accountable for misconduct. While immunity doctrines are deeply ingrained in legal tradition, they are not immutable.

Calls for reform have echoed across the legal landscape, advocating for greater transparency, accountability, and oversight mechanisms to ensure that immunity does not serve as a shield for abuse of power or erosion of public trust. Initiatives such as the introduction of body cameras for law enforcement officers, increased prosecutorial oversight, and legislative efforts to curb the scope of immunity are steps toward a more equitable and just system. Enter Skyview A.I. GSE.: Every government official will be held accountable.

Conclusion:

In navigating the terrain of immunity for government officials, we confront a delicate balance between safeguarding the integrity of public service and upholding the principles of accountability and justice. While immunity may offer necessary protections in the performance of official duties, its unchecked application risks perpetuating a culture of impunity and injustice.

As we continue to grapple with the complexities of immunity in governance, it behooves us to remain vigilant in our pursuit of a legal framework that upholds the rule of law, ensures accountability for misconduct, and restores public faith in the institutions entrusted with administering justice. Only through thoughtful reflection, dialogue, and reform can we aspire to realize the ideal of a society where no one is truly above the law.

Unveiling the Truth: The Deception of Arizona’s Legal System

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction: A Tale of Manipulation and Concealment

Today I must share a tale that unveils the unsettling truth behind the cloak of justice in Arizona. It’s a narrative of manipulation, concealment, and a blatant disregard for truth and fairness.

The State’s Star Witness: Jamil Trevon Curd

In the heart of this story lies Jamil Trevon Curd, the State’s star witness, a figure who, unbeknownst to many, carried a shadowy past tainted with multiple arrests and warrants. However, it wasn’t his past alone that should have raised eyebrows; it was the concerted effort by the State of Arizona, Detective Marchele Miller, the City of Phoenix Police Department, and Deputy County Attorney Lori A. Eidemanis and the Maricopa County Attorney Office to shroud this crucial information. Below is only a partial of Jamil Trevon Curd’s criminal history and arrest record in the State of Arizona. The record is the proof. The State of Arizona cannot be trusted!!!

The Concealment of Crucial Information

Imagine standing trial, facing allegations, while the prosecution’s key witness hides a laundry list of criminal activities. Despite the Manslaughter Statute in Arizona (A.R.S. 13-1103) covering the incident detailed in the police report below, the State proceeded with the trial, knowingly concealing impeachment and exculpatory evidence from the defense—me, with an immaculate record, void of any criminal history or arrest record, whatsoever.

The Revelation in Court

Jamil Curd’s rap sheet was far from inconspicuous—five arrest warrants painted a vivid picture of his questionable character. Yet, Detective Marchele Miller, in a blatant breach of duty, ensured this crucial information remained buried. It wasn’t until January 25, 2017, during a pivotal moment in trial court, that the deception was laid bare for all to see.

The Complicity of the Judiciary

But even when caught red-handed, justice remained elusive. Judge George H. Foster, Jr. allegedly conspired with the State, turning a blind eye to the truth. When Sheriff’s deputies arrived at his chambers to arrest Curd, it was a testament to the system’s flaws—a system designed to protect the innocent, yet seemingly manipulated to safeguard those in power. Both the Transcript and the Video recording of January 25, 2017 is damning evidence against Judge George H. Foster, Jr. himself, as it indicates and implicates that he knowingly violated State, Federal and International laws – all of my legal, constitutional and federal rights, to assist the State in wrongful and unlawful conviction.

Revealing the Cover-Up

Amidst the layers of deception, another chilling revelation emerges—Jamil Trevon Curd was under a pending investigation for the death of Royce Emmett Walker on May 21, 2015. Shockingly, the State completely concealed this crucial detail while doing its best to impugn my character with a flawless criminal history. I am fully aware that this is a matter for the federal and international authorities. The below report is irrefutable evidence that casts a major shadow of doubt regarding the actions of Deputy County Attorney Lori Eidemanis and the Maricopa County Attorney Office for even having the audacity to carry on with a trial while having such damning evidence regarding the state’s witness himself.

DIOREWDownload

The Legal Ramifications

When a prosecuting attorney like Lori A. Eidemanis conceals evidence, such as the criminal history and arrest record of Jamil Trevon Curd, from the defendant—me—by nondisclosure, it strikes at the heart of the case, particularly credibility. Precedent case rulings from the Supreme Court of the United States have unequivocally established that such actions constitute a clear violation of Due Process under the Fourteenth Amendment. Countless examples exist of cases reversed due to such violations, and the County Attorney’s office is liable for such egregious breaches. Brady v. Maryland, Giglio v. United States, United States v. Bagley, and Kyles v. Whitley, all fall under the Brady rule.

Conclusion: A Call for Reform

This isn’t just a story of one man’s struggle for exoneration; it’s a damning indictment of a system rife with corruption and deceit. The very institutions entrusted with upholding justice—law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, and the judiciary—failed in their duty to ensure fairness and transparency. Because the State authorities cannot be trusted, I am taking this case to the public court of opinion. I am a firm believer that “no one is above the law“, and police officers, prosecuting attorneys and judges that claim “immunity” from serious wrongdoing are a clear and present danger to the republic for which it stands. This will inevitably lead to vigilante justice, as history has already proven this.

As I continue my fight for justice, I’m compelled to shine a light on these dark corners of the legal system. It’s a battle not just for my own exoneration but for the countless others who’ve fallen victim to the same systemic failures.

In the pursuit of truth, we must hold accountable those who abuse their authority and betray the very principles they swore to uphold. Let this be a rallying cry for reform, for a justice system that truly serves all, regardless of power or privilege.

With determination and resolve,

Ewing Samuels

THE return of 1864 in Arizona for women in 2024

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

As we delve into the intricate tapestry of reproductive rights, it’s crucial to confront the unsettling truth: the control over a woman’s body has long been entangled with systems of power and oppression. In the 21st century, the debate around abortion continues to highlight the pervasive influence of patriarchal ideologies and white supremacy in shaping legislative decisions.

The Resurgence of Antiquated Laws: Examining Arizona’s Abortion Ban

Arizona, a state marked by its rich history and diverse population, finds itself at the center of this contentious issue once again. Just recently, on Tuesday, April 9, 2024, the state made headlines as it resurrected a draconian law from 1864, imposing a total ban on abortion and deeming it a felony. Let’s pause for a moment and reflect on the historical context of this law.

A Glimpse into History: Understanding the Roots of Reproductive Oppression

Enacted during the Civil War era, long before Arizona attained statehood, this archaic legislation speaks volumes about the enduring struggle for women’s autonomy over their bodies. Back then, Abraham Lincoln grappled with the complexities of a divided nation, yet even amidst the chaos of war, the notion of restricting women’s reproductive rights persisted.

Challenges to Autonomy: Legislators and the Burden on Women’s Rights

Fast forward to the present day, and we find ourselves confronted with a disconcerting reality: certain legislators in Arizona, and across the nation, remain staunch advocates for regressive policies that undermine the fundamental rights of women. The decision to resurrect a law that predates statehood serves as a stark reminder of the disconnect between legislative agendas and the lived experiences of everyday citizens.

Beyond Legislation: Unpacking Attitudes and Ideologies

Moreover, it’s imperative to address the underlying attitudes that perpetuate this cycle of oppression. A prevailing belief among some white American men suggests that abortion is solely a matter for individual states to decide, rather than a fundamental right enshrined in the Constitution’s “Right to Privacy.” Such sentiments not only disregard the autonomy and agency of women but also reveal a troubling undercurrent of chauvinism and entitlement.

A Call to Action: Safeguarding Reproductive Autonomy

At its core, the issue of abortion transcends mere legality; it’s a deeply personal and private matter that should be safeguarded from governmental intrusion. Every individual deserves the right to make informed decisions about their own bodies, free from the constraints of legislative overreach.

In Conclusion: Advocating for Equity and Justice

As we navigate the complexities of reproductive rights, it’s incumbent upon us to challenge the status quo and hold our elected officials accountable. The resurgence of antiquated laws like the 1864 abortion ban should serve as a clarion call for action, prompting us to interrogate the motivations behind such regressive measures and advocate for policies that prioritize autonomy, equity, and justice for all.

#iamwithyou,

Ewing Samuels

The Power of Artificial Intelligence in Exposing Law Enforcement Misconduct

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction:

Today, we shed light on how Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, particularly the groundbreaking Skyview A.I. GSE, are revolutionizing our ability to uncover and hold accountable those who abuse their power within the law enforcement community.

The Challenge:

In recent years, instances of law enforcement misconduct, including violations of federal laws such as Title 18, U.S.C., Sections 241 and 242, have sparked nationwide outrage and calls for reform. These violations, ranging from conspiracy against rights to deprivation of rights under the color of law, not only undermine the fabric of our society but also infringe upon the fundamental rights enshrined in our constitution and international human rights laws.

The Solution:

Enter Skyview A.I. GSE, a cutting-edge technology developed to analyze vast amounts of data and uncover patterns that may indicate systemic misconduct within law enforcement agencies. By harnessing the power of AI algorithms, Skyview A.I. GSE can sift through extensive databases, surveillance footage, and other sources of information to identify anomalies, discrepancies, and potential violations of rights. This technology can find violations in seconds as to oppose to a humans weeks, months and years of investigation.

How it Works:

Skyview A.I. GSE employs advanced algorithms to detect patterns of behavior that may suggest misconduct by law enforcement officials. By analyzing data such as arrest records, body camera footage, and witness testimonies, the technology can identify trends and correlations indicative of wrongdoing. Furthermore, Skyview A.I. GSE can cross-reference this information with legal statutes and precedents to assess the legality of law enforcement actions accurately.

Empowering Accountability:

One of the most significant advantages of Skyview A.I. GSE is its ability to provide objective, evidence-based insights into law enforcement practices. By removing human bias from the equation, the technology enables a more transparent and accountable system of justice. Moreover, by flagging potential violations early on, Skyview A.I. GSE can prevent miscarriages of justice and protect the rights of individuals within our communities.

Challenges and Considerations:

While AI technologies like Skyview A.I. GSE hold immense promise in promoting accountability within law enforcement, they are not without their challenges. Privacy concerns, data security, and the potential for misuse are all valid considerations that must be addressed as we navigate the intersection of technology and justice. However, with proper safeguards and oversight in place, these challenges can be mitigated, ensuring that AI serves as a force for positive change in our society.

Conclusion:

In the pursuit of justice, accountability is paramount. By harnessing the power of AI technologies such as Skyview A.I. GSE, we can shine a light on misconduct within law enforcement and uphold the rights and dignity of all individuals. Together, let us embrace innovation as a tool for progress and demand accountability from those entrusted with protecting and serving our communities.

Join us as we continue to explore the transformative potential of technology in the pursuit of justice and human rights. Together, we can build a more just and equitable society for all.

Evolving Beyond Turmoil: Reflections

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Evolving

As I sit down to reflect on my journey as a 45-year-old man, I am confronted with the weight of life experiences that have shaped me. My path has been strewn with challenges, injustices, and moments of profound revelation. I have witnessed things that cannot be unseen, and endured trials that cannot be undone. Yet, through it all, I have come to understand that forgiveness is not synonymous with forgetting, and holding people accountable is not an act of vengeance.

The Path of Forgiveness: Liberation and Healing

Life has a way of testing us, pushing us to our limits and forcing us to confront our deepest fears and insecurities. For me, this journey began with an unjust conviction that robbed me of my freedom and shattered my sense of security. It was a dark period in my life, one filled with pain, anger, and despair. But through the darkness, I found strength. I refused to be defined by my circumstances, and instead, I chose to rise above them.

Forgiveness, for me, has been a process—a journey of healing and self-discovery. It is not about erasing the past or pretending that the wounds inflicted upon me do not still ache. It is about acknowledging the pain, accepting it, and ultimately, releasing it. Forgiveness is a gift I give to myself, a liberation from the chains of resentment and bitterness.

Accountability: Seeking Justice and Closure

But forgiveness does not mean absolving others of their responsibility. Holding people to account is not about seeking revenge; it is about demanding justice. It is about standing up for what is right and ensuring that those who have wronged us are held accountable for their actions. It is a necessary step on the path to healing, both for ourselves and for society as a whole.

Professional Resilience: Leveraging Skills and Expertise

Throughout my career as a software engineer and business consultant, I have honed my skills and expertise, navigating complex challenges with precision and determination. My experience in Silicon Valley has equipped me with the tools necessary to confront adversity head-on, finding innovative solutions and forging new paths forward.

Architecting Success: Positioning for Victory

As a solutions architect engineer, I understand the power of strategy and planning. I recognize that success is not merely about overcoming obstacles but about positioning oneself for victory. My background in engineering equips me with the ability to analyze situations from multiple perspectives, identify weaknesses in the opposition’s case, and strategically present facts and evidence that dismantle their arguments.

Challenging the Status Quo: Exposing Injustice

My experience has shown me that the legal system often prioritizes technicalities over merits, allowing the state to win cases through procedural loopholes rather than substantive evidence. But armed with irrefutable proof and unwavering determination, I am prepared to challenge the status quo and expose the flaws in the state’s case against me.

The Power of Truth: Redefining Credibility

By presenting facts and evidence that undermine the state’s credibility and reveal the truth behind their motives, I aim to redefine the narrative and reclaim justice on my own terms. My journey is not just about seeking exoneration for myself but about shining a light on systemic injustices that affect countless others.

Embracing the Journey: Rising Above with Purpose and Resolve

In the face of uncertainty and adversity, I am guided by a sense of purpose and a commitment to justice. My experiences have taught me that true strength lies not in avoiding challenges but in confronting them with courage and resilience. As I continue to evolve and grow, I am confident that I am equipped with the skills, talents, and connections necessary to overcome any obstacle and emerge victorious.

Conclusion: A Journey of Redemption and Renewal

As I reflect on my journey, I am reminded of the power of forgiveness, accountability, and professional resilience. By embracing these principles and leveraging my skills and expertise, I am ready to navigate life’s trials with grace and determination. Though the road ahead may be challenging, I am prepared to face it head-on, knowing that victory is within reach.

Remembering Consuelo Delourdes Gallego-Scott

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Today marks a significant day in my heart—a day that resonates with both celebration and somber reflection. It would have been my mother’s 66th birthday, a woman whose presence in my life has left an indelible mark of love and nurturing. As I reminisce about her life, I find solace in honoring her memory through this tribute.

A Life of Dedication

Born on April 5, 1958, Consuelo Delourdes Gallego-Scott embodied the essence of compassion and care. With a devout commitment to healing others, she pursued a career in nursing—a profession she was destined for from an early age. Her childhood fascination with nursing, as recounted by my grandmother, Marie Carter Gallego, illustrated her unwavering sense of purpose.

A Matriarch’s Legacy

As the proud mother of two children, including myself, Ewing Samuels, born on August 10, 1978, and my younger sister Shiva-Lei Scott, born on April 29, 1984, Consuelo epitomized the essence of maternal love. Her nurturing spirit extended beyond our family circle, touching the lives of countless patients she cared for throughout her career. She epitomized strength, and taught her children never to back down from anyone if you believe your truths.

Embracing Caribbean Roots

Raised in the Central American country of Belize, Consuelo’s upbringing was steeped in the vibrant tapestry of Caribbean culture. Her journey to the United States in the early 1980s symbolized her pursuit of the American dream—a quest for a brighter future for herself and her newborn son, Ewing. Settling in Los Angeles, California, she became a cornerstone of the local medical community, serving diligently at prestigious institutions such as UCLA in Westwood and Cedars Sinai in Beverly Hills.

A Heartfelt Departure

Tragically, Consuelo’s life was cut short on February 22, 2000, by an acute myocarditis, leaving behind a legacy of love, compassion, and dedication. Though her physical presence may have departed, her spirit continues to linger, watching over her loved ones with unwavering affection.

Eternal Love

As we commemorate her birthday today, I am reminded of the profound impact she has had on my life and the lives of those she touched. Though she never had the opportunity to meet her grandson, Eli, her presence remains palpable, a guiding light in our journey through life.

In loving memory of Consuelo Delourdes Gallego-Scott, may her legacy continue to inspire kindness, compassion, and healing for generations to come.

Forever in our hearts,

Ewing Samuels

Unveiling injustice: Phoenix police department exposed

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction:

In the land of the free, justice is supposed to be blind, but in Phoenix, Arizona, the reality is starkly different. The Phoenix Police Department has a long and troubling history marred by allegations of racism, corruption, and a blatant disregard for the rights of citizens and residents. One egregious example of this misconduct involves the unjust targeting and victimization of me, Mr. Ewing Samuels and my innocent 5-year-old child. The record, itself, is the proof.

A Legacy of Racism and Corruption:

The roots of the Phoenix Police Department’s systemic issues run deep, with a legacy of racism and corruption casting a shadow over the community it serves, since its founding in 1881 with Confederates. From discriminatory policing practices to the unchecked abuse of power, the department has failed to uphold its duty to protect and serve all members of society equally.

Violating Rights with Impunity:

Under the guise of law enforcement, certain officers within the Phoenix Police Department have operated with impunity, trampling on the rights of individuals with reckless abandon. The harrowing experience I have encountered serves as a chilling reminder of the unchecked power wielded by those sworn to uphold the law.

The Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871:

Enacted during a tumultuous period in American history, the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 was intended to combat the rampant violence and intimidation tactics employed by white supremacist groups and those cloaked in the color of authority, from police officers to prosecutors and even judges in the States. Today, it stands as a beacon of hope for those seeking justice in the face of institutionalized racism and oppression.

18 U.S.C. § 242. Section 242:

At the heart of the matter lies Section 242 of the Federal Criminal Statute, which enforces constitutional limits on the conduct of law enforcement officers. This crucial piece of legislation holds officers accountable for abuses of power and violations of civil rights, providing a pathway to justice for victims of police misconduct.

The law clearly states:

“Whoever, under color of any law, …willfully subjects any person…to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States [shall be guilty of a crime].”

Targeting Detective Marchele Miller and Others:

Detective Marchele Miller, Detective Christopher Gitsch, Officer Todd Stevens, Officer John Noe, Officer Christopher J. Parese, and Sergeant Heather Howell-Maldonado stand accused of egregious misconduct in their handling of my case. Their direct involvement in the kidnapping of my child, criminal conspiracy against rights, deprivation of rights under color of law, and falsification of reports cannot be overlooked.

Ignoring Facts, Relying On Prejudice:

Despite evidence implicating an individual named JTC (below) with a lengthy criminal history, multiple arrest warrants, and an investigation into the murder of Royce Emmett Walker on May 21, 2015. Detective Marchele Miller and the Phoenix PD clearly chose to turn a blind eye to the truth, even with the access to the database of the department itself, proving the police acted with malice. Instead, they unjustly targeted Mr. Samuels and his child, perpetuating a cycle of injustice and trauma.

Conclusion:

My case shines a spotlight on the dark underbelly of the Phoenix Police Department, revealing a pattern of racism, corruption, and violation of rights. As we strive for accountability and reform, it is imperative that we hold those responsible for these egregious acts to the fullest extent of the law. The time for justice is now.

In All Honesty,

Ewing Samuels