Posts Tagged :

judges

Defamation, Libel, and Slander: Unveiling the Truth Behind Injustice

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Exposing the Deception: The Impact of Selective Publications

Today, I want to delve into a topic that strikes at the core of justice and integrity: defamation, libel, and slander. As a victim of these injustices myself, I stand firm in shedding light on how state authorities can misuse their power to tarnish reputations and undermine credibility. Yet it must be understood that these very same state authorities deliberately, knowingly, and intentionally engage in routine active fraudulent concealment and the omission of material facts, denying due process, not some of the time, but ALL OF THE TIME!

Unveiling the Truth: A Closer Look at Incomplete Narratives

In my case, I have faced a barrage of challenges stemming from a wrongful and unlawful conviction in the State of Arizona. Despite being released after 6.5 years of incarceration, the ordeal did not end there. Upon my return to Belize, I discovered a web of publications scattered across various websites, each presenting fragments of the case without the full truth. These publications were not only misleading but also intentionally crafted to harm my reputation and credibility.

Standing Against Injustice: The Power of Accountability

The dissemination of incomplete and biased information has profound consequences. It not only erodes trust but also perpetuates misconceptions and prejudices. As someone deeply committed to upholding truth and justice, I refuse to let these falsehoods stand unchallenged.

Shedding Light on the Facts: Holding the Responsible Accountable

Let’s address the facts:

  1. Wrongful Conviction: On February 2, 2017, I was convicted under circumstances marred by injustice. Despite evidence pointing to my innocence, the legal system failed to deliver a fair trial.
  2. Incomplete Publications: Multiple websites have hosted documents related to my case, yet they only present partial information. This selective sharing not only distorts the narrative but also serves to defame my character.
  3. Damage to Reputation: The repercussions of these publications extend far beyond personal grievances. They impede my ability to rebuild my life and pursue justice for the injustices I’ve endured.

Advocating for Truth and Justice: A Call to Action

It’s crucial to hold accountable those responsible for perpetuating these falsehoods. By exposing the truth and demanding accountability, we pave the way for a more just and equitable society.

Utilizing Technology for Justice: Skyview A.I.’s Groundbreaking Contribution

In this pursuit of truth, my company, Skyview A.I. GSE, has developed a groundbreaking artificial intelligence application called Oversight. Oversight aids in uncovering blatant disregard of facts, assisting prosecuting attorneys in charging those ‘cloaked under color of law’ with crimes and human rights violations under universal jurisdiction. This innovative technology is a beacon of hope for those seeking accountability and justice in the face of systemic injustices.

The Below is a Preview of the Listing of Dirty and Corrupt Cops in Oversight:

Arizona-DecertificationsDownload

Seeking Justice: Taking a Stand Against Injustice

Here are some of the websites hosting documents pertaining to my case:

  1. Website 1: https://casetext.com/case/state-v-samuels-72
  2. Website 2: https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-unpublished/2018/1-ca-cr-17-0225.html
  3. Website 3: https://casetext.com/case/state-v-samuels-122014
  4. Website 4: https://www.leagle.com/decision/inazco20180816003
  5. Website 5: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/20-71137/20-71137-2021-02-19.html
  6. Website 6: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-9th-circuit/2112631.html

While these publications may attempt to distort reality, I remain steadfast in my pursuit of truth and justice. With irrefutable evidence and unwavering determination, I am confident that justice will prevail. It is clear that the “authorities’ listed in these cases are armed with the power of a government with unlimited resources, and most people with this kind of power commit atrocties under the cloak, guise and color of law.

One must remember that even Adolf Hitler and the Nazis in power in Germany in the 1940s were arresting, detaining, imprisoning, deporting and executing individuals under the “color of law“. It was all deemed Legal. at that time. It is also very disturbing that some of these JEWISH descendants (prosecutors, judges, attorneys) in the courts are committing the very same atrocities against black and brown people with the power of their offices in the United States of America, that they constantly claim occurred to their own grandparents in Nazi Germany in the Holocaust. They know what racism is. They know what white supremacy is. They know exactly what they are doing!

Together We Stand: Uniting Against Falsehoods

In closing, I urge you to remain vigilant against misinformation and to stand with me in the fight against defamation, libel, and slander. Together, we can strive for a world where truth triumphs over falsehoods and justice prevails for all.

Thank you for your unwavering support,

Ewing Samuels

Unveiling Judicial Bias: A Call to Action for Justice

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

Today, I want to address a critical issue plaguing our justice system: judicial bias. As someone who has experienced the injustices firsthand, I am deeply troubled by the erosion of fair trial principles in state courts across the United States. From favoritism towards the prosecution to blatant antagonism towards defendants, it’s clear that the neutrality requirement enshrined in the United States Constitution is being trampled upon.

The Prosecution’s Preferential Treatment

One of the most alarming manifestations of judicial bias is the preferential treatment given to the prosecution. In numerous cases, judges have exhibited a propensity to side with prosecutors, often at the expense of defendants’ rights. This bias can manifest in various forms, from allowing questionable evidence to be admitted to the courtroom to imposing disproportionately harsh sentences.

Antagonism Towards Defendants

Equally troubling is the antagonism displayed towards defendants. Instead of serving as impartial arbiters of the law, some judges seem to view defendants with suspicion and disdain. This predisposition can lead to rushed judgments, denial of crucial evidence, and an overall denial of the right to a fair trial.

Rooted in White Supremacy

Adding to the complexity of the issue is the deeply ingrained pattern, practice, and customs rooted in white supremacy within the judiciary. This insidious influence perpetuates systemic biases that disproportionately affect marginalized communities. State court judges, emboldened by these entrenched beliefs, often operate under the illusion of being unaccountable for their actions, even in cases of wrongful and unlawful convictions. It is an insane asylum, when the administrators of law knowingly violate the law holding others to account, but believe that they can NEVER be accountable for their own actions and inactions, costing irreparable harm to individuals’ lives.

Historical Precedents

Throughout history, there have been instances where state court judges have been arrested or convicted, casting doubt on the integrity of their judgments. These cases serve as stark reminders of the dangers of unchecked judicial power and the need for robust oversight mechanisms. Examples of such judges for factual reference are Josef Altstötter, Noel Arrigo, Mark Ciavarella, Jacques Delisle, Thomas J. Maloney, Ernst Pöhner, Oswald Rothaug are just to name a few.

The Legal Framework: 28 U.S. Code § 144

It’s crucial to recognize the legal framework designed to address judicial bias. 28 U.S. Code § 144 stipulates procedures for challenging the bias or prejudice of a judge. However, the effectiveness of these mechanisms is often hindered by institutional barriers and a reluctance to confront entrenched biases within the judiciary.

The Issue of Absolute Immunity

Moreover, the concept of “absolute immunity” further exacerbates the issue of judicial accountability. Judges are granted near-untouchable status, shielded from any repercussions for their actions, no matter how reckless or unjust. This lack of accountability undermines the very foundation of our legal system and erodes public trust in the judiciary.

A Call to Action

It’s imperative that we address these issues head-on. The integrity of our justice system depends on it. We must demand accountability from judges, advocate for reforms that promote fairness and impartiality, and hold those responsible for judicial bias to account.

Conclusion

As I continue my fight for justice, I urge you to join me in speaking out against judicial bias and standing up for the rights enshrined in the Constitution. Together, we can strive towards a legal system that upholds the principles of equality, fairness, and justice for all.

Sincerely,

Ewing Samuels