Posts Tagged :

human rights

U.S. Human Rights Landscape: Insights from the 2023 GRIP Annual Report

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

In an era where the narrative of American exceptionalism often pervades, it’s imperative to scrutinize the nation’s performance on a global scale, especially concerning human rights. The recently released 2023 GRIP Annual Report, a collaborative effort between the Global Rights Project (GRIP) and the CIRIGHTS data project, offers a sobering evaluation of the United States’ commitment to human rights.

Assessing America’s Standing

The report, which evaluates 195 countries across various human rights metrics, paints a nuanced picture of America’s standing in the world. Divided into four categories—physical integrity, empowerment, worker rights, and justice rights—the assessment aims to provide a comprehensive overview of each nation’s adherence to fundamental human rights principles.

A Closer Look at Challenges

Regrettably, the findings reveal a widespread disregard for human rights globally, with 60% of countries receiving failing grades. In this landscape, the United States narrowly avoided a failing grade, scoring a 64 and ranking 59th overall. While this may seem favorable compared to some nations, it underscores significant room for improvement within America’s human rights framework.

One of the report’s focal points is the discrepancy between America’s perceived strengths in civil and political rights and its shortcomings in other areas. Specifically, issues such as torture, extrajudicial killings, and labor rights highlight areas of concern. Law enforcement’s use of interrogation techniques bordering on torture and the disproportionate use of lethal force against black Americans underscore systemic issues that demand urgent attention.

Connecting Personal Experience to the Larger Context

As we absorb these findings, it’s essential to reflect on how they resonate with individual experiences. In my case, as someone who has faced egregious and flagrant violations of fundamental rights and due process within the U.S. legal system, this report strikes a particularly poignant chord. I have endured due process violations, fraud against me, the kidnapping of my 5 year old child, state authorities engaged in perjury in courts against me, deception to paint a picture that never existed and still doesn’t exist, overt racism, poisoned while incarcerated, denial of medical care while incarcerated, assaulted by correctional officer while in Florence, Arizona, placed in a dog cage all day, deplorable living conditions, torture, witnessing law enforcement smuggle drugs and phones in prison, and witnessing multiple murders while I was in prison. And NO, I will never help any law enforcement with what I have seen.

My wrongful and unlawful conviction served as a stark reminder of the imperfections within America’s justice system. It exemplifies how individuals can become ensnared in a system that, despite its professed commitment to human rights, can perpetuate injustice and deny individuals their fundamental rights.

2016 (BEFORE) 2022 (INCARCERATED) 2023 (RELEASED) 2024 (TODAY)

A Call for Vigilance and Accountability

In light of these revelations, it becomes evident that the U.S. government cannot be trusted with more significant matters if fundamental human rights are not safeguarded at home. The need for transparency, accountability, and a steadfast commitment to upholding human rights cannot be overstated. Only through collective vigilance and concerted efforts can we hold our institutions accountable and ensure that justice prevails for all.

Finding Hope Amidst Challenges

Despite these challenges, the report offers a glimmer of optimism by positioning the United States favorably compared to other populous countries and geopolitical rivals. While not without flaws, America’s relatively stronger performance in certain human rights indicators serves as a testament to the enduring values enshrined in its founding principles. Yet the country is seeing a downward spiral with clear knowledge of violating human rights on account of race, color, sex, religion, and national origin.

Moving Forward Together

As we reflect on these findings, it’s crucial to recognize that human rights progress is not linear. The report’s insights serve as a call to action for policymakers, activists, and citizens alike to redouble their efforts in upholding and advancing human rights both domestically and globally.

In closing, let us heed the words of Skip Mark, director of the Center for Nonviolence and Peace Studies, who aptly remarked, “There’s a lot of work to do in terms of ensuring that all people have a chance to live a life of dignity and respect.” Together, let us strive to build a world where human rights are not just an aspiration but a lived reality for all.

I am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

The Law of Comity: State vs. Federal and the Echoes of History

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

In the intricate dance of governance in the United States, the relationship between state and federal laws often feels like a tightrope walk. Yet, one principle that underpins this relationship is the Law of Comity. This doctrine, aimed at promoting harmony and respect among jurisdictions, can sometimes be overshadowed by instances where states seemingly defy federal mandates, echoing echoes of history that led to conflict. Let’s delve into this complex interplay, exploring how it intersects with themes of bigotry, racism, prejudice, and xenophobia.

The Tug-of-War: State vs. Federal: However, the harmony envisioned by the Law of Comity is often tested in the real world. In recent times, we’ve witnessed instances where certain states have seemingly flouted federal laws, particularly on issues ranging from immigration to civil rights. This tension between state autonomy and federal supremacy can sometimes create a legal tug-of-war, with profound implications for societal harmony.

International Human Rights Laws vs. Federal Supremacy: Adding another layer to this complexity is the fact that states have no legal obligation to follow international human rights laws if it contradicts federal supremacy laws. While the United States is a signatory to numerous international treaties and conventions, the doctrine of federal supremacy establishes that federal law takes precedence over conflicting state laws. This raises critical questions about the intersection of domestic and international legal obligations, highlighting the challenges of balancing global human rights norms with domestic legal frameworks.

Echoes of History: To fully grasp the gravity of this discord, we must acknowledge the historical echoes it evokes. The fissures that led to the first civil war in the United States were not merely ideological but deeply rooted in issues of bigotry, racism, prejudice, and xenophobia. Today, as we witness similar tensions simmering beneath the surface, it’s imperative to heed the lessons of the past.

Confronting Bigotry, Racism, Prejudice, and Xenophobia: The intersection of law and societal values underscores the importance of confronting bigotry, racism, prejudice, and xenophobia head-on. While legal frameworks provide a foundation for justice, they must be reinforced by a collective commitment to equality and fairness for all.

Moving Forward: As we navigate the complexities of governance and justice, it’s essential to remember that the Law of Comity is not a one-way street. It requires mutual respect and adherence to the principles of democracy and human rights. By fostering dialogue and understanding, we can strive towards a more inclusive and equitable society, where the echoes of history serve as reminders, not repetitions.

Conclusion: In the tapestry of American jurisprudence, the Law of Comity occupies a crucial space, reminding us of the delicate balance between state autonomy and federal authority. As we confront the challenges of our time, let us uphold the principles of justice, equality, and mutual respect, ensuring that history’s echoes guide us towards a brighter, more harmonious future.