Posts Tagged :

gse

Money, Power, and Influence in Belize: A Trifecta for Change

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

Belize, a gem in Central America, is at a pivotal moment in its history. The interplay of money, power, and influence shapes its socio-economic landscape. As someone who has navigated the corridors of Silicon Valley and the studios of Hollywood, and endured the trials of wrongful conviction and deportation, I, Ewing Redmond Samuels III, am committed to leveraging my experiences to foster meaningful change in Belize.

Money in Belize: An Economic Overview

Belize’s economy is primarily driven by tourism, agriculture, and energy. According to the World Bank, the GDP of Belize was approximately $1.8 billion in 2022. While this reflects growth, it also underscores the challenges of economic diversification and the need for sustainable development. The unemployment rate, hovering around 9%, signals a critical need for job creation and economic opportunities.

In comparison to other countries, Belize’s GDP per capita is modest. For instance, neighboring Mexico boasts a GDP per capita of around $9,900, while the United States stands at approximately $63,000. This disparity highlights the potential for growth and development in Belize. My background in software engineering and business consultancy positions me to contribute to economic innovation and technological advancements, which are crucial for Belize’s progress.

“My background in software engineering and business consultancy positions me to contribute to economic innovation and technological advancements, which are crucial for Belize’s progress.”

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

Power Dynamics: Governance and Political Landscape

Power in Belize is intricately linked with its political and social structures. The country operates under a parliamentary democracy, with a political climate that often sees a tug-of-war between the major parties—the United Democratic Party (UDP) and the People’s United Party (PUP).

Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index 2022 ranks Belize 84th out of 180 countries, indicating a significant challenge with corruption. Effective governance is pivotal for harnessing the potential of Belize’s resources and ensuring equitable distribution of wealth.

Drawing from my experiences in the United States, where political activism and legal advocacy are robust, I am poised to champion transparency and accountability in Belize. My wrongful conviction has given me a profound understanding of the need for judicial reforms and human rights advocacy, essential components for a just society.

UNITED DEMOCRATIC PARTY (UDP)
PEOPLE’S UNITED PARTY (PUP)

Influence: Cultural and Social Capital

Influence in Belize is shaped by its diverse cultural heritage and vibrant social fabric. With a population of approximately 400,000, Belize is a melting pot of ethnicities, including Mestizo, Creole, Maya, and Garifuna communities. This diversity is a source of strength, fostering a rich cultural landscape.

Globally, influence is often measured by soft power, as seen in countries like the United States and Japan, which use cultural diplomacy to extend their global reach. Belize, too, can harness its cultural assets to enhance its influence on the world stage.

Having spent years in Hollywood’s entertainment industry, I understand the power of media and culture in shaping perceptions and driving social change. By promoting Belize’s unique cultural heritage and creative industries, we can enhance our global standing and foster national pride.

My Vision for Belize

My exposure to diverse cultures, religions, and educational systems has equipped me with a unique perspective. I recognize the importance of knowing when to speak up and when to listen—a skill essential for effective leadership. My journey from Silicon Valley to Hollywood, through the criminal justice system and back to Belize, has been a crucible that forged my commitment to service.

In the realm of money, I aim to drive economic diversification, focusing on technology and innovation. In the sphere of power, I advocate for transparency, judicial reforms, and robust governance. Through influence, I will champion Belize’s cultural heritage, leveraging media and creative industries to project our nation’s strengths globally.

Conclusion

Belize stands at the threshold of potential transformation. The interplay of money, power, and influence will determine our trajectory. With my background and commitment to change, I am dedicated to contributing to a prosperous, just, and influential Belize. Together, we can build a future that honors our heritage and embraces progress.

Until Next Time…

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

For more insights and updates on my journey and initiatives, visit ewingsamuels.com. Join me in this mission to harness the trifecta of money, power, and influence for the betterment of Belize.

Sources:

  • World Bank, Belize Country Overview
  • Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2022
  • Central Intelligence Agency, The World Factbook

Government Double Standards 2

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

In today’s society, the actions of governments and those of ordinary individuals are often judged by vastly different standards, despite sometimes being fundamentally similar. Governments possess the unique ability to redefine behaviors that would otherwise be considered criminal if committed by private citizens, using specific laws and statutes to justify their actions. This blog explores numerous examples that illustrate these double standards:

Government Surveillance vs. Unauthorized Surveillance

When Government Does It, it is called government surveillance, authorized under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978, particularly Section 702. When anybody else does it, it’s unauthorized surveillance, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 2511 – Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited.

Military Detention vs. Unlawful Detention

When Government Does It, it is called military detention, authorized under the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) of 2001. When anybody else does it, it’s unlawful detention, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law.

Forced Vaccination vs. Assault

When Government Does It, it is called forced vaccination, under laws such as 42 U.S. Code § 264 – Regulations to control communicable diseases. When anybody else does it, it’s assault, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 113 – Assaults within maritime and territorial jurisdiction.

Civil Commitment vs. False Imprisonment

When Government Does It, it is called civil commitment, under laws like 42 U.S. Code § 10802 – Protection and advocacy of mentally ill individuals. When anybody else does it, it’s false imprisonment, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 1201 – Kidnapping.

Government Propaganda vs. Fraud

When Government Does It, it is called government propaganda, under laws such as the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948. When anybody else does it, it’s fraud, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 1341 – Frauds and swindles.

Border Control vs. Human Trafficking

When Government Does It, it is called border control, under laws like the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). When anybody else does it, it’s human trafficking, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 1589 – Forced labor.

Government Sanctions vs. Economic Coercion

When Government Does It, it is called government sanctions, authorized under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). When anybody else does it, it’s economic coercion, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 1951 – Interference with commerce by threats or violence.

Asset Seizure vs. Burglary

When Government Does It, it is called asset seizure, under laws like 21 U.S. Code § 881 – Forfeitures. When anybody else does it, it’s burglary, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 2113 – Bank robbery and incidental crimes.

National Defense vs. Armed Assault

When Government Does It, it is called national defense, under laws like 10 U.S. Code § 5063 – Marine Corps: composition and functions. When anybody else does it, it’s armed assault, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 111 – Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees.

Government Immunity vs. Evading Prosecution

When Government Does It, it is called government immunity, under laws like the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S. Code § 2671). When anybody else does it, it’s evading prosecution, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 1073 – Flight to avoid prosecution or giving testimony.

Conclusion

These examples highlight the profound power imbalance and the different legal justifications that governments employ, which often criminalize similar behaviors by individuals. This disparity underscores the need for continued scrutiny and accountability in the actions of those in power.

Until Next Time…

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

Invisible Scars: The Toll Of Imprisonment And Its Lifelong Impact

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

Imprisonment is a harsh reality for many, but its effects extend far beyond the prison walls. The psychological trauma endured during incarceration can have profound and lasting impacts on an individual’s mental health, life outcomes, and overall outlook on life. This blog explores these effects, supported by statistics from reputable government agencies, and underscores the urgent need for reform and support for those reentering society.

Mental Health Effects of Imprisonment

Imprisonment often exposes individuals to a range of stressors, including isolation, violence, murder, torture, and a lack of autonomy. These conditions can lead to various mental health issues, such as:

  1. Depression and Anxiety: According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, more than half of all prison and jail inmates in the U.S. have a mental health problem, with depression and anxiety being among the most common issues.
  2. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): The National Institutes of Health (NIH) reports that 21% of prisoners have experienced PTSD, stemming from traumatic events during incarceration.
  3. Substance Abuse Disorders: Many inmates struggle with substance abuse issues, which are often exacerbated by the prison environment. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) found that around 58% of state prisoners and 63% of sentenced jail inmates meet the criteria for drug dependence or abuse.

The Adverse Impact on Life Outcomes

The effects of imprisonment are not confined to the time spent behind bars. They extend into every aspect of an individual’s life post-release, influencing their social, economic, and psychological well-being.

  1. Employment and Income: Former inmates face significant barriers to employment. The Bureau of Justice Statistics indicates that two-thirds of released prisoners were not employed within five years of their release. Those who do find work often earn significantly less than their peers, perpetuating a cycle of poverty.
  2. Education: Imprisonment can disrupt educational pursuits. Data from the U.S. Department of Education shows that only 14% of prisoners have some college education, compared to 48% of the general population.
  3. Recidivism: Mental health issues and lack of support can lead to high recidivism rates. The National Institute of Justice reports that within five years of release, about 76.6% of released prisoners are rearrested.

My Personal Journey

As someone who has experienced the full brunt of the prison system, I can attest to the deep and lasting impacts it has on one’s mental health and overall life. My name is Ewing Redmond Samuels III. Born in Belize City, Belize, in 1978, I emigrated to the United States as a child and built a life there, only to have it upended by a wrongful and unlawful conviction. After serving 6.5 years in the Arizona Department of Corrections and additional time in federal custody, I was deported back to Belize in 2023.

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) defines deportation or forcible transfer of a population as a crime against humanity. The ICC is located in The Hague and prosecutes individuals accused of crimes against humanity, which are serious violations committed against a civilian population. Deportation is defined as the displacement of people across an international border. Forcing people to leave their place of residence through expulsion or other coercive acts for reasons not permitted by international law could be a crime against humanity, a war crime, or both. The 15 forms of crimes against humanity listed in the Rome Statute include offences such as murder, rape, imprisonment, enforced disappearances, enslavement – particularly of women and children, sexual slavery, torture, apartheid and deportation.

Rome Statute of The International Criminal Court

Even though I now live in the paradise of the tropical Caribbean, the shadows of my incarceration linger. I struggle daily with a multitude of personal and professional challenges. The trauma has not only affected me but has also profoundly impacted my son, leaving us both grappling with lifelong scars.

Despite my 20 years of experience as a software engineer in Silicon Valley, and my extensive background as a business consultant and music and film producer, reintegration has been an uphill battle. The stigma of my past and the psychological toll of my experiences continue to pose significant hurdles.

Outlook on Life

The psychological toll of imprisonment can fundamentally alter an individual’s outlook on life. Feelings of hopelessness, mistrust, and social withdrawal are common among former inmates.

  1. Hopelessness and Despair: Prolonged exposure to the harsh conditions of prison life can lead to chronic feelings of hopelessness and despair, which can hinder reintegration efforts.
  2. Mistrust and Social Withdrawal: Many former inmates develop a deep-seated mistrust of others and often withdraw from social interactions. This isolation can prevent them from building the social support networks necessary for successful reintegration.
  3. Stigma and Discrimination: The stigma associated with a criminal record can lead to social and institutional discrimination, further alienating former inmates and diminishing their sense of self-worth.

The Need for Reform and Support

Addressing the mental health needs of inmates and providing comprehensive support post-release is crucial for improving life outcomes and reducing recidivism. Here are some steps that can make a difference:

  1. Mental Health Services: Increasing access to mental health services in prisons and jails can help mitigate some of the adverse effects of incarceration.
  2. Educational and Vocational Training: Providing inmates with educational and vocational training can improve their employment prospects post-release.
  3. Support Networks: Establishing robust support networks, including counseling, mentorship programs, and community support, can aid in the reintegration process.

Conclusion

The mental health effects of imprisonment are profound and far-reaching, influencing every aspect of an individual’s life post-release. By understanding these impacts and advocating for comprehensive reform and support, we can help former inmates rebuild their lives and contribute positively to society. I have seen more than I care to admit in the United States and the American criminal justice system, and now question the so called authorities in control of”law and order”.

Until Next Time…

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

The Phoenix Police Department: Abuse of Power

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

The Dark Underbelly of Phoenix: Uncovering Police Misconduct

In the sprawling metropolis of Phoenix, Arizona, a city known for its desert landscapes and vibrant culture, there lies a darker underbelly—a system marred by corruption and abuse of power. At the forefront of this injustice stands the Phoenix Police Department (PPD), an entity entrusted with upholding the law but often found guilty of violating it.

22 Arizona Police Officers Punished So Far In 2024

In a year marked by heightened scrutiny of law enforcement, Arizona’s Peace Officer Standards and Training Board (AZPOST) has taken action against misconduct within the state’s police force. With 37 investigations opened since August, including cases of officers asking suggestive questions to minors and threatening individuals with deadly force, the board has suspended or revoked certifications for 22 officers. Notable cases include Mesa officer Clinton Bertola’s inappropriate interrogation of high school girls and Gilbert Police Officer Andrew Neves’ use of excessive force. These actions underscore AZPOST’s pivotal role in holding officers accountable and safeguarding public trust in law enforcement, emphasizing the need for ongoing reform and oversight.

On a personal note, I wrote a letter to AZPOST and sent them the evidence needed of an arrest record and criminal history of Detective Marchele Miller in 2019, at present still I’ve heard nothing yet.

Arizona’s Law Enforcement Accountability: AZPOST Probes 20 More Cases of Police Misconduct in 2023

Arizona’s law enforcement watchdog, the Arizona Peace Officer Standards and Training Board (AZPOST), has intensified its scrutiny of police conduct, opening investigations into 20 new cases of misconduct since March. Allegations include excessive force, bungled investigations, and instances of domestic violence, reflecting a disturbing trend within the state’s police force. Notable cases involve a trooper ordering his police dog to bite individuals and a Tempe officer tasing an unarmed man 13 times. AZPOST’s role in holding officers accountable underscores the importance of transparency and oversight in maintaining public trust in law enforcement.

Arizona Police Misconduct: 17 Officers Under Investigation for Various Offenses in 2023

Marked by a string of troubling incidents, the Arizona Peace Officer Standards and Training Board (AZPOST) has opened investigations into 17 cases of police misconduct. Among the allegations are excessive force, DUIs, reckless driving, and instances of dishonesty. These cases shed light on internal investigations often kept from public view, ranging from a state trooper’s controversial TikTok videos to a small-town police chief’s DUI arrest. Despite heightened scrutiny, AZPOST’s decisions on disciplinary actions remain pivotal, with some high-profile use-of-force cases resulting in no further action taken.

DATABASE OF DECERTIFICATIONS OF ‘DIRTY COPS‘ FROM AZPOST:

Arizona-DecertificationsDownload

Concealed Crimes: Detective Marchele Miller’s Hidden Past

One even more outrageous example of this misconduct is the case of Detective Marchele Miller, whose own criminal history and arrest record were conveniently concealed from both the public and the defense in a court of law. This deliberate act of deception not only undermines the integrity of our justice system but also raises serious questions about the credibility of those tasked with enforcing the law. Obtaining indictments and testifying in trials, with a known criminal history and arrest record of deception and lying, this kind of officer is a clear and present danger since February 23, 2012.

DetectiveMarcheleMillerCHAR-1Download

Operating Under the ‘Color of Law’: The PPD’s Abuse of Authority

The concept of operating under the ‘color of law‘ is not unfamiliar to the PPD. It refers to the misuse of power, typically by government officials, to deprive individuals of their constitutional rights under the guise of enforcing the law. In the case of Detective Marchele Miller, her actions epitomize this abuse of authority, as she exploited her position to suppress vital information that could have potentially exonerated innocent individuals. Ironically, the federal statute requires a 5-20 year prison sentence for this kind of violation.

Phoenix’s Police Oversight Agency Struggles Amid City Interference

The Office of Accountability and Transparency (OAT) in Phoenix faced internal challenges as city officials undermined its independence, leading to the resignation of its director, Roger Smith. Despite public claims of robust oversight, documents reveal city officials’ efforts to control OAT’s operations, including blocking the hiring of an experienced attorney, Catherine Bowman. Smith’s departure highlighted ongoing tensions between city leadership and efforts for meaningful police accountability.

Phoenix Police Chief Defends Force Amidst Fatal Shooting

Amidst an orchestrated media campaign by Phoenix Police Chief Michael Sullivan defending the department against federal oversight, officers shot and killed a man, marking the second fatal police shooting in six days. The city’s pushback against a Justice Department investigation into use of force highlights ongoing tensions between law enforcement and calls for accountability. Yet, interesting that a so-called Law Enforcement Officer in leadership does not recognize the ‘supreme Law of the Land’ of the Federal Government, but believes that he and the PPD can subjugate those in the City Of Phoenix to local laws with severe pains, penalties, and punishment inducing a life of trauma and tragedy.

DOJ Launches Investigation into Phoenix Police Misconduct

The U.S. Department of Justice initiates a comprehensive probe into the Phoenix Police Department and the city of Phoenix over allegations of misconduct, including excessive force and retaliation against protesters. Attorney General Merrick Garland and Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke announced the investigation, which will scrutinize various aspects of police conduct, including use of force, discriminatory policing, and treatment of individuals experiencing homelessness. The probe follows a series of controversies, including a crackdown on protests and a high number of police shootings, raising concerns about civil rights violations and accountability within the department.

Just recently the FBI arrested a Phoenix police officer on April 5 for allegedly receiving and possessing thousands of images and videos of child pornography. Gilbert resident Alaa Robert Bartley, 41, was indicted three days later by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Arizona. He was charged with one count of receiving child pornography and one count of knowingly possessing child pornography.Bartley faces a sentence of five years to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000 on the receiving charge. The possession charges carry a maximum sentence of 10 years, or 20 years if the pornography depicts a minor who is not yet 12, as well as a fine of up to $250,000.

Pursuing Justice: Advocating for Reform

But my pursuit of justice does not end with exposing the misconduct of the PPD; it extends to holding those responsible accountable for their actions. Through my legal human rights advocacy, Premise GSE, I aim to shed light on the injustices perpetrated by the PPD and advocate for meaningful reform within the department.

Join the Fight: Standing Up Against Injustice

Transparency and accountability are the cornerstones of a fair and just society. By shining a spotlight on the actions of Detective Miller and others like her, we can begin to dismantle the culture of impunity that has long plagued the PPD. It is time to demand accountability from those sworn to protect and serve, and to ensure that justice is truly blind. As I continue to fight for my own rights and seek redress for the injustices I have endured, I invite others to join me in holding the Phoenix Police Department accountable. Together, we can strive towards a future where the law is upheld with integrity and fairness, and where no one is above the law, not even those sworn to enforce it.

Until next time,

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

The Purpose of Government: Upholding Integrity in the Face of Corruption

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

As citizens, we entrust our governments with the solemn responsibility of safeguarding our rights, ensuring justice, and promoting the common good. However, what happens when those entrusted with power betray that trust? When corruption festers within the corridors of authority, it not only erodes the foundation of democracy but also undermines the very purpose of government itself.

The Core Purpose of Government

Throughout history, governments have been established to serve the people, to provide for their welfare, and to maintain order in society. The social contract between citizens and their government is based on the mutual understanding that power will be wielded responsibly and in the best interest of all.

The Impact of Corruption

Yet, when officials succumb to the temptations of corruption, when they prioritize personal gain over the well-being of their constituents, the fabric of society begins to unravel. Corruption breeds mistrust, cynicism, and disillusionment among the populace. It perpetuates inequality, stifles economic growth, and undermines the rule of law.

The Tactic of “Divide and Conquer”

Moreover, when corruption is allowed to thrive unchecked, it often employs the insidious tactic of “divide and conquer.” By pitting communities against each other, by sowing seeds of discord and resentment, corrupt officials seek to maintain their grip on power. They exploit divisions along lines of race, class, religion, or ideology, weakening the collective strength of the people.

Demanding Accountability and Transparency

In the face of such challenges, it falls upon the shoulders of conscientious citizens to demand accountability and transparency from their government. We must hold our elected representatives accountable for their actions, and we must insist on reforms that strengthen democratic institutions and root out corruption at all levels of government.

Upholding Values of Governance

Transparency, accountability, and integrity must be the guiding principles of governance. Only by upholding these values can governments fulfill their true purpose: to serve the people, protect their rights, and promote the common good.

A Case of Institutional Betrayal

Consider the recent case in Phoenix, where the former Maricopa County prosecutor, April Sponsel, falsely indicted innocent protesters with gang-related charges in 2020. This egregious abuse of power not only resulted in the wrongful persecution of individuals exercising their right to protest but also tarnished the reputation of the justice system.

Sponsel’s actions, characterized by a “disturbing pattern of excessive charging,” led to her dismissal from the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office in June of 2022. Her failure to review available evidence and her refusal to acknowledge any wrongdoing demonstrate a blatant disregard for justice and integrity. And yet, it was the Maricopa County Attorney Office who bred, nourished and trained her how to do what she was doing, until caught red-handed.

This is the same exact office that obtained an indictment, took me to trial and convicted me on hearsay, fabricated evidence, perjury, subornation, covered-up the kidnapping of my son, covered-up the murder of Royce Emmett Walker on May 21,2015, fraudulent concealment of impeachment and exculpatory evidence and deliberate and intentional violations of due process, and way too many to list here. People’s lives are being damaged by corrupt officials in the State of Arizona.

Where is the federal government in all of this when a state authority commits state abuse of power?

Below is an ORDER of what April Sponsel did and the “sanctions” delivered by the Judge:

sponsel-decision-and-order-imposing-sanctions-pdj-2023-9018Download

The suspension of Sponsel’s law license for at least two years is a testament to the far-reaching and deleterious consequences of her actions. As noted by the presiding judge, her misconduct damaged morale within the office and painted it as lacking integrity. This betrayal of trust not only undermines the public’s faith in the justice system but also perpetuates a culture of impunity among those in power.

Conclusion

As we navigate the complexities of the modern world, let us remain vigilant in our commitment to justice and democracy. Let us strive to build a society where the purpose of government is not overshadowed by corruption, but rather, where it shines brightly as a beacon of hope and progress for all.

I am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

Shedding Light on the Dark Realities of the Foster Care System

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

In our society, the foster care system stands as a pillar of protection for children facing abuse and neglect. Yet, beneath its noble facade lies a troubling truth: many of these vulnerable children, taken from their homes in the name of safety, are thrust into environments where they face an increased risk of sexual abuse and exploitation.

Facts

In 2019 there were an estimated 400,000 children in foster care. Of those children, it is estimated that up to 40% of them had experienced some type of abuse within the system. In the United States it is estimated there are 57,329 child victims of sexual abuse each year. One 2019 foster care report noted that out of 423,997 children in the foster care system, over 46% were in nonrelative placements. Black children experienced more maltreatment than White children in multiple categories and were also noted to have higher rates of predictors of maltreatment by the NCIS software. In 2019, 23% of children in foster care were Black, 21% were Hispanic, and 8% considered multiracial, with 44% of children in foster care identifying as white. Foster care was formally established by the federal government in the Social Security Act of 1935. Up to 90% of sexually abused teens admitted to instigating violent behavior. Preferred Citation: Abigail Hessing. “Sexual Abuse of Children in the United States Foster Care System” Ballard Brief. February 2022. www.ballardbrief.org.

The Pervasive Nature of Sexual Abuse

Studies conducted across different regions unveil shocking figures. In Maryland, research from John Hopkins University indicates that children in foster care are four times more likely to experience sexual abuse than their peers outside the system, with those in group homes facing an alarming 28-fold increase in risk. Similarly, findings from Oregon and Washington state reveal that nearly one-third of foster children report abuse by a foster parent or another adult in the home. Even investigations in New Jersey foster homes cast doubt on the safety of these environments, with researchers concluding that no assurances can be given regarding the well-being of foster children.

The Connection to Child Sex Trafficking

Perhaps most distressing is the connection between foster care and child sex trafficking. More than half of the minors rescued from trafficking operations in 2013 were from foster care or group homes, highlighting a systemic failure to protect these vulnerable individuals from exploitation.

Racial Disparities

Moreover, racial disparities further exacerbate the injustices within the system. African American children are disproportionately represented in foster care, comprising over one-third of the population despite accounting for only 15% of all children. Women of color are more likely to be reported for child abuse and neglect, leading to a higher likelihood of having their children removed from their care.

Defining Neglect

In many cases, the definition of neglect itself perpetuates systemic injustice. Factors such as homelessness or financial instability are often used as grounds for removal, further entrenching racial and socioeconomic disparities.

The Need for Reform

The foster care system, like any institution, must be held accountable for its failures. Stricter screening of caregivers, robust protocols for investigating abuse claims, and increased prosecution of perpetrators are crucial steps toward ensuring the safety and well-being of foster children. Prosecutions and arrests must include the child care operatives themselves. On a personal note, in my case and while I was in jail and prison, most prisoners I found had a background from being in the foster care system that included abuse, while in the system, which eventually led to drug and alcohol abuse, and crime. The State authorities are ultimately culpable and are to be held accountable under international laws and universal jurisdiction.

Conclusion

As we strive to build a society where every child can thrive, we must confront the uncomfortable truths lurking within our child welfare system. Only then can we truly fulfill our obligation to protect the most vulnerable among us and provide them with the nurturing, supportive childhood they deserve.

Respectfully,

Ewing Samuels

Incompetence, Ineptitude And Injustice in Arizona Government

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Unearthing the Issue

In April 2024, the State of Arizona found itself confronting a critical flaw within its Department of Child Safety (DCS) system. The discovery revealed a troubling reality: judges were rendering decisions regarding child removals without access to crucial information.

Attorney General’s Call to Action

Prompted by this revelation, Attorney General Kris Mayes initiated a review of more than 650 closed cases. The aim? To determine whether undisclosed documents could have influenced the outcomes. The stakes were high, with the potential for overturned decisions concerning parental rights, guardianships, or adoptions.

Assessing the Impact

Assistant Attorney General Kirsten Wright sent letters to presiding judges in all 15 counties, urging them to suspend action on pending cases related to child placement. Initial assessments suggested that a staggering 3,800 juvenile dependency cases statewide may be affected. The magnitude of the situation demanded a comprehensive approach.

A Case-by-Case Evaluation

With thousands of cases under scrutiny, a meticulous examination was underway. Each case would be evaluated individually to determine the significance of any undisclosed documents. The goal? To ascertain whether errors in disclosure warranted reopening cases and potentially reversing prior decisions.

Accountability and Responsibility

As investigations unfolded, blame for the systemic issue was directed at the previous administration. Governor Katie Hobbs and DCS Director David Lujan held former Governor Doug Ducey and his DCS appointee, Michael Faust, accountable for the flawed system. The failure to ensure proper document disclosure was deemed unacceptable.

Doug Ducey
Michael Faust
Mark Brnovich

Arizona Revised Statute (ARS) Title 13, Criminal Code § 13-105 defines criminal negligence as when someone fails to recognize a substantial and unjustifiable risk that a result will occur or a circumstance exists. The risk must be of such a nature and degree that the failure to perceive it constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would observe in the situation.

The State law itself indicates and implicates Former Governor Doug Ducey, Former Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich and Michael Faust is in violation of Arizona Revised Statute (ARS) Title 13, Criminal Code § 13-105. In a state that likes to jump the gun and charge people with a crime, it is a wonder how many people have to suffer at these criminogenic dirtbags in thirst for power.

Technical Challenges and Remedial Measures

The problem stemmed from a system implemented in 2021 by DCS to track all documents. Known as Guardian, it was billed as a replacement for CHILDS, the Children’s Information Library and Data Source, in place since 1997. Despite its promise, Guardian faced its own set of challenges, including delays in payments to foster parents and the recent revelation of undisclosed documents.

Behind the scenes, efforts were made to address the technical intricacies of the flawed system. Lujan shed light on the complexities, highlighting the challenges in ensuring the accurate filing of reports from external service providers. Despite recent fixes, concerns lingered about the system’s efficacy.

Conclusion: Upholding Accountability and Safeguarding Children

In conclusion, the recent developments underscored the ongoing commitment of Arizona officials to safeguarding the welfare of children. Despite facing significant challenges, steps were being taken to strengthen oversight and uphold accountability. As the state forged ahead, ensuring the integrity of the child protection system remained paramount. There are clear facts and inicators that the State of Arizona have more than most likely damaged the welfare of thousands of children and violated families since 1997. This calls for a serious Federal and International investigation of kidnapping and child abductions through State Government.

Thank you for your continued support and engagement as we navigate these critical issues together.

Warm regards,

Ewing Samuels

Unmasking the Charade: The Illusion of Reform in Arizona’s Child Welfare

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction: A Cloak of Deception

Arizona’s child welfare system stands exposed, its flaws laid bare for all to see. Governor Jan Brewer’s ostensible initiative to overhaul the system rings hollow in the face of entrenched failures and bureaucratic malaise. As the state convenes a special legislative session, the façade of reform belies a deeper truth: the perpetuation of a broken system under a different guise. This article dismantles the illusion of change, exposing the true motives behind Arizona’s so-called child welfare reforms.

The Theatre of Reform: Smoke and Mirrors

Behind the grandiose rhetoric of reform lies a stark reality: the Arizona Department of Child Safety (AZDCS) is little more than a rebranded version of its failed predecessor. Governor Brewer’s purported commitment to child safety rings hollow in light of the systemic failures that have plagued the state’s child welfare apparatus for decades. As the state embarks on yet another round of bureaucratic reshuffling, the fundamental issues remain unaddressed, relegated to the shadows by a superficial veneer of change.

A System Betrayed: The Legacy of Neglect

The legacy of “neglect” and mismanagement within Arizona’s child welfare system is undeniable. From the staggering backlog of 6,600 uninvestigated cases to the systemic failures that have endangered countless children, the state’s track record speaks for itself. Governor Brewer’s attempt to rebrand the agency as a beacon of child safety is a cruel irony, a slap in the face to the countless families who have suffered at the hands of a broken system.

The Truth Unveiled: Exposing the Agenda

Amidst the spectacle of reform, the true agenda behind Governor Brewer’s initiative comes into focus. By perpetuating the illusion of change, the state seeks to deflect attention from its own failures and evade accountability for the systemic injustices that continue to plague Arizona’s most vulnerable children. Behind the façade of reform lies a more insidious truth: the preservation of a status quo that serves the interests of the powerful at the expense of the powerless.

Complicity Unveiled: The Role of the Attorney General

Within the intricate web of Arizona’s bureaucratic apparatus, the Attorney General’s Office emerges as a formidable guardian of the Arizona Department of Child Safety (AZDCS). Tasked ostensibly with upholding justice, this office often assumes the role of protector, shielding AZDCS from scrutiny and shielding its agents from accountability.

Defending the Indefensible: Protecting AZDCS at All Costs

When individuals like myself challenge the actions of AZDCS, the Attorney General’s Office becomes their staunch defender. Employing tactics of intimidation, threats, deception and obfuscation, they seek to safeguard AZDCS from the consequences of its actions. Through acts of perjury and slander, they silence dissent and perpetuate the illusion of infallibility surrounding AZDCS.The Arizona Attorney General’s Office is complicit in numerous crimes and crimes against children with knowledge and evidence within its posession. The Department of Justice needs to investigate this agency. There are clear crimes and human rights violations that can be taken up in the international courts.

An Active Participant in Injustice

In their zealous defense of AZDCS, the Attorney General’s Office becomes complicit in the systemic injustices that plague Arizona’s child welfare system. By prioritizing the preservation of power over the pursuit of truth and justice, they betray the very principles they are sworn to uphold. Victims are left to navigate a landscape of deceit and betrayal, denied the justice they rightfully deserve.

Conclusion: A Call to Action

As Arizona embarks on yet another round of bureaucratic reshuffling, it is imperative that we see through the illusion of reform and demand real accountability for the systemic failures that have endangered countless children. Governor Brewer’s attempt to rebrand the Arizona Department of Child Safety is a cynical ploy, designed to placate public outrage while perpetuating the very system that has failed so many. It is time to unmask the charade of reform and demand real change for Arizona’s children.

Truthfully,

Ewing Samuels

The Harrowing Reality of Kidnapping: A Personal Account of Injustice in Arizona

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction:

Kidnapping is a crime that strikes fear into the hearts of families worldwide. It’s a violation of the most fundamental human rights, tearing loved ones apart and leaving lasting scars. However, what happens when the perpetrators wear badges and operate under the guise of law enforcement? This is the chilling reality that I faced when my son was taken from me by authorities in the State of Arizona.

The Facts of Kidnapping:

Kidnapping, as defined by both state and federal statutes, involves the unlawful transportation, restraint, or confinement of an individual against their will. It’s a grave offense that carries severe penalties, rightfully so given its impact on victims and their families.

State and federal laws provide clear guidelines on what constitutes kidnapping and outline the consequences for those found guilty. These laws are meant to protect individuals from such heinous acts and ensure justice is served.

18 U.S. Code § 1201 – Kidnapping

(a) Whoever unlawfully seizes, confines, inveigles, decoys, kidnaps, abducts, or carries away and holds for ransom or reward or otherwise any person, except in the case of a minor by the parent thereof, when—

(2) any such act against the person is done within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States;

(c) If two or more persons conspire to violate this section and one or more of such persons do any overt act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life.

The Arizona Incident:

On March 21, 2016, I experienced every parent’s worst nightmare when my 5-year-old son was taken from me by authorities in Arizona. Despite having evidence to the contrary, including proof of proper care and guardianship, my son was unjustly deemed to be in “neglectful” conditions.

Detective Marchele Miller, Detective Christopher Gitsch, Officer Todd Stevens, and Sergeant Heather Howell Maldonado, and the City of Phoenix Police Department, along with individuals from the Arizona Department of Child Safety, conspired to fabricate evidence and unlawfully separate a father from his child. Their actions were not only morally reprehensible but also constituted a blatant violation of my rights as a parent. I have even more substantive documents on the Arizona Department of Child Safety as this State agency, the year prior, was directly involved and responsible for the rape and molestation of over 500 children within state custody and tried to cover up these crimes by threatening anyone of reporting this to the media. The proof of the State changing the name from CPS to DCS indicates and implicates serious wrongdoing and cover-up.

The Cover-Up:

What makes this case even more disturbing is the blatant cover-up orchestrated by those involved. Instead of upholding the law and protecting the innocent, law enforcement officers and child safety officials chose to manipulate documents, fabricate evidence, and conspire against my legal rights.

The irrefutable evidence I possess exposes the extent of their wrongdoing, highlighting a systemic failure within the justice system to hold those in positions of power accountable for their actions. I filed the Motion For Judicial Notice, pursuant to Arizona Rules of Evidence 201, as indicated below, yet NO judge at the Superior Court of Maricopa County has answered this, even though their own state court rules and Arizona Constitution indicate the Court must answer motions in 30 days. It’s 2 years now. The record is the proof.

Seeking Justice:

In the face of such injustice, I am determined to assert my legal, constitutional, and human rights. Armed with undeniable proof of the malicious intent behind my son’s abduction, I am fighting tirelessly to bring those responsible to justice and reunite with my child.

Convention on the Rights of the Child: (United Nations)

SPECIAL NOTE: The United States has not ratified the CRC despite its active role in drafting the treaty.

Article 9

1. States Parties shall ensure that a child shall not be separated from his or her parents against their will, except when competent authorities subject to judicial review determine, in accordance with applicable law and procedures, that such separation is necessary for the best interests of the child. 

Conclusion:

My story serves as a sobering reminder of the dark realities of kidnapping, particularly when perpetrated by those entrusted with upholding the law. It underscores the importance of holding individuals and institutions accountable for their actions and fighting for justice in the face of adversity.

As I continue my quest for truth and justice, stand in solidarity with me, hoping for a resolution that brings healing and closure to my family. It’s imperative that we shine a light on cases like his, ensuring that the voices of victims are heard and that the perpetrators of such egregious crimes are held accountable. I will not rest until.

Regards,

Ewing Samuels

The Paradox of Immunity: Legal Safeguards for Government Officials

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

In a world where the principle of “no one is above the law” stands as a fundamental tenet of justice, the concept of immunity for government officials presents a paradox. While the law ostensibly applies equally to all, certain individuals within the government are shielded by legal doctrines that afford them protection from prosecution or civil suits, even in the face of compelling evidence of wrongdoing. Let’s delve into the intricate landscape of immunity, particularly in the United States, and explore its implications on accountability and justice.

Understanding Immunity:

Immunity, in the context of government officials, comes in various forms, each tailored to specific roles within the judicial system. Among the most notable are qualified immunity for police officers and absolute immunity for prosecutors and judges.

  • Qualified Immunity: This doctrine shields law enforcement officers from civil liability for actions performed in the line of duty, unless their conduct violates clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. Essentially, it provides a buffer against frivolous lawsuits but has often been criticized for shielding officers from accountability, even in cases of egregious misconduct.
  • Absolute Immunity: Unlike qualified immunity, which is a defense against civil suits, absolute immunity offers broader protection, typically extended to prosecutors and judges. It grants them immunity from civil liability for actions performed within the scope of their official duties, safeguarding them from being sued for damages arising from their prosecutorial or judicial functions.

Implications of Immunity:

While immunity serves to protect government officials from the burden of constant litigation and personal liability, it can also create a perception of impunity. When individuals entrusted with upholding the law are shielded from accountability, it undermines public trust in the justice system and fosters a sense of injustice among those who feel wronged by official misconduct.

Examples of Retribution:

Instances abound where individuals, disillusioned by the perceived impunity of government officials, have taken matters into their own hands in pursuit of retribution. Take, for example, cases where victims of police brutality, denied recourse through legal channels due to qualified immunity, resort to public protests or even retaliatory violence as a means of seeking justice.

Similarly, in the realm of prosecutorial misconduct, where absolute immunity often protects prosecutors from civil liability, instances of wrongful convictions or egregious abuses of power have led to public outrage and, in some cases, vigilantism against those perceived to have evaded accountability.

Seeking Reform:

The issue of immunity for government officials is a complex one, balancing the need to protect individuals performing essential public functions with the imperative of holding them accountable for misconduct. While immunity doctrines are deeply ingrained in legal tradition, they are not immutable.

Calls for reform have echoed across the legal landscape, advocating for greater transparency, accountability, and oversight mechanisms to ensure that immunity does not serve as a shield for abuse of power or erosion of public trust. Initiatives such as the introduction of body cameras for law enforcement officers, increased prosecutorial oversight, and legislative efforts to curb the scope of immunity are steps toward a more equitable and just system. Enter Skyview A.I. GSE.: Every government official will be held accountable.

Conclusion:

In navigating the terrain of immunity for government officials, we confront a delicate balance between safeguarding the integrity of public service and upholding the principles of accountability and justice. While immunity may offer necessary protections in the performance of official duties, its unchecked application risks perpetuating a culture of impunity and injustice.

As we continue to grapple with the complexities of immunity in governance, it behooves us to remain vigilant in our pursuit of a legal framework that upholds the rule of law, ensures accountability for misconduct, and restores public faith in the institutions entrusted with administering justice. Only through thoughtful reflection, dialogue, and reform can we aspire to realize the ideal of a society where no one is truly above the law.

  • 1
  • 2