Posts Tagged :

george h.foster jr.

The Purpose of Government: Upholding Integrity in the Face of Corruption

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

As citizens, we entrust our governments with the solemn responsibility of safeguarding our rights, ensuring justice, and promoting the common good. However, what happens when those entrusted with power betray that trust? When corruption festers within the corridors of authority, it not only erodes the foundation of democracy but also undermines the very purpose of government itself.

The Core Purpose of Government

Throughout history, governments have been established to serve the people, to provide for their welfare, and to maintain order in society. The social contract between citizens and their government is based on the mutual understanding that power will be wielded responsibly and in the best interest of all.

The Impact of Corruption

Yet, when officials succumb to the temptations of corruption, when they prioritize personal gain over the well-being of their constituents, the fabric of society begins to unravel. Corruption breeds mistrust, cynicism, and disillusionment among the populace. It perpetuates inequality, stifles economic growth, and undermines the rule of law.

The Tactic of “Divide and Conquer”

Moreover, when corruption is allowed to thrive unchecked, it often employs the insidious tactic of “divide and conquer.” By pitting communities against each other, by sowing seeds of discord and resentment, corrupt officials seek to maintain their grip on power. They exploit divisions along lines of race, class, religion, or ideology, weakening the collective strength of the people.

Demanding Accountability and Transparency

In the face of such challenges, it falls upon the shoulders of conscientious citizens to demand accountability and transparency from their government. We must hold our elected representatives accountable for their actions, and we must insist on reforms that strengthen democratic institutions and root out corruption at all levels of government.

Upholding Values of Governance

Transparency, accountability, and integrity must be the guiding principles of governance. Only by upholding these values can governments fulfill their true purpose: to serve the people, protect their rights, and promote the common good.

A Case of Institutional Betrayal

Consider the recent case in Phoenix, where the former Maricopa County prosecutor, April Sponsel, falsely indicted innocent protesters with gang-related charges in 2020. This egregious abuse of power not only resulted in the wrongful persecution of individuals exercising their right to protest but also tarnished the reputation of the justice system.

Sponsel’s actions, characterized by a “disturbing pattern of excessive charging,” led to her dismissal from the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office in June of 2022. Her failure to review available evidence and her refusal to acknowledge any wrongdoing demonstrate a blatant disregard for justice and integrity. And yet, it was the Maricopa County Attorney Office who bred, nourished and trained her how to do what she was doing, until caught red-handed.

This is the same exact office that obtained an indictment, took me to trial and convicted me on hearsay, fabricated evidence, perjury, subornation, covered-up the kidnapping of my son, covered-up the murder of Royce Emmett Walker on May 21,2015, fraudulent concealment of impeachment and exculpatory evidence and deliberate and intentional violations of due process, and way too many to list here. People’s lives are being damaged by corrupt officials in the State of Arizona.

Where is the federal government in all of this when a state authority commits state abuse of power?

Below is an ORDER of what April Sponsel did and the “sanctions” delivered by the Judge:

sponsel-decision-and-order-imposing-sanctions-pdj-2023-9018Download

The suspension of Sponsel’s law license for at least two years is a testament to the far-reaching and deleterious consequences of her actions. As noted by the presiding judge, her misconduct damaged morale within the office and painted it as lacking integrity. This betrayal of trust not only undermines the public’s faith in the justice system but also perpetuates a culture of impunity among those in power.

Conclusion

As we navigate the complexities of the modern world, let us remain vigilant in our commitment to justice and democracy. Let us strive to build a society where the purpose of government is not overshadowed by corruption, but rather, where it shines brightly as a beacon of hope and progress for all.

I am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

Navigating the Herd Mentality: The NEED For Critical Thinking & Logical Reasoning

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

Today I want to delve into a topic that’s been weighing heavily on my mind: the decline of critical thinking in today’s society. In an age where information bombards us from every angle, it’s more crucial than ever to sharpen our ability to think critically and reason logically. Yet, it seems that herd mentality often prevails, leading many astray like sheep to the slaughter.

Understanding Herd Mentality

What exactly do I mean by herd mentality? It’s the phenomenon where individuals tend to conform to the behaviors, beliefs, and opinions of the majority, often without questioning or analyzing them. It’s also known as the bandwagon effect. This conformity can be comforting, as it provides a sense of belonging and security. However, it can also be dangerous, as it blinds us to alternative perspectives and leaves us vulnerable to manipulation and misinformation.

The Challenge of Information Overload

In today’s hyper-connected world, we’re inundated with information from social media, news outlets, and other sources. While this abundance of information can be empowering, it also presents a challenge: how do we separate fact from fiction, truth from propaganda?

The Role of Critical Thinking

The answer lies in cultivating our critical thinking skills. Critical thinking involves actively and skillfully evaluating information, arguments, and evidence to make informed decisions. It’s about questioning assumptions, challenging beliefs, and approaching issues with an open mind.

Obstacles to Critical Thinking

Unfortunately, critical thinking seems to be in short supply these days. Instead, we’re bombarded with sensationalist headlines, echo chambers that reinforce our existing beliefs, and soundbites designed to manipulate rather than inform.

Implications in Real-Life Situations

Take, for example, my own case. In my experience, I’ve seen firsthand how the absence of critical thinking and logical reasoning can lead to serious consequences. When individuals blindly follow the herd, without questioning the validity of the information presented to them, it can result in grave injustices. Not only does this impact the individual directly involved, but it also implicates the entire system that failed to uphold principles of fairness and justice. Below is evindence of FRAUD, KIDNAPPING, and CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY committed by the State of Arizona and its legal authorities. Under universal jurisdiction and both federal and international laws, the crimes committed are subject to 20 years to life in prison. The State of Arizona cannot be taken serious when it covered up the death of Royce Emmett Walker on May 21, 2015 and the very same murder suspect Jamil Trevon Curd was given immunity to testify against me. While Detective Marchele Miller the case manager went to grave lengths to push a narrative that was based on deception. And increasing the errors a thousandfold was the deliberate violations of ommitting material facts, concealing impeachment and exculpatory evidence,perjury, subornation, and too much to list…conducted by William Montgomery, David Foster and Lori Eidemenis of the Maricopa County Attorney Office in a ‘court of law’. Then the Court itself, of George H. Foster, Jr. and the Superior Court of Maricopa County is allowed to continue intentional violations to cover up State authorities crimes, with ORDERS from the court with no real adequate investigation into the facts thereof, but to attain, maintain, and sustain convictions on technicalities rather than merits.

05312022-PPM-ProPerMailDownload

Strategies for Improvement

So, what can we do to combat this trend? First and foremost, we must become more mindful consumers of information. This means taking the time to verify sources, cross-check information, and seek out diverse perspectives. It also means being willing to admit when we’re wrong and adjust our beliefs accordingly.

The Importance of Education

Furthermore, we need to teach critical thinking skills from an early age. Education systems should prioritize teaching students how to think, not what to think. By instilling a foundation of logic, reasoning, and skepticism, we can empower the next generation to navigate the complexities of the modern world with clarity and confidence.

The Power of Independent Thought

But perhaps most importantly, we must be willing to think for ourselves. It’s easy to succumb to the pressure of the crowd, to follow the path of least resistance. But true wisdom lies in forging our own path, even if it means standing alone against the tide.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the rise of herd mentality in today’s society is a cause for concern. But it’s not too late to turn the tide. By prioritizing critical thinking and logical reasoning, we can reclaim our autonomy, challenge the status quo, and build a brighter future for generations to come.

Until next time,

I am,

Ewing Samuels

Unveiling Judicial Bias: A Call to Action for Justice

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

Today, I want to address a critical issue plaguing our justice system: judicial bias. As someone who has experienced the injustices firsthand, I am deeply troubled by the erosion of fair trial principles in state courts across the United States. From favoritism towards the prosecution to blatant antagonism towards defendants, it’s clear that the neutrality requirement enshrined in the United States Constitution is being trampled upon.

The Prosecution’s Preferential Treatment

One of the most alarming manifestations of judicial bias is the preferential treatment given to the prosecution. In numerous cases, judges have exhibited a propensity to side with prosecutors, often at the expense of defendants’ rights. This bias can manifest in various forms, from allowing questionable evidence to be admitted to the courtroom to imposing disproportionately harsh sentences.

Antagonism Towards Defendants

Equally troubling is the antagonism displayed towards defendants. Instead of serving as impartial arbiters of the law, some judges seem to view defendants with suspicion and disdain. This predisposition can lead to rushed judgments, denial of crucial evidence, and an overall denial of the right to a fair trial.

Rooted in White Supremacy

Adding to the complexity of the issue is the deeply ingrained pattern, practice, and customs rooted in white supremacy within the judiciary. This insidious influence perpetuates systemic biases that disproportionately affect marginalized communities. State court judges, emboldened by these entrenched beliefs, often operate under the illusion of being unaccountable for their actions, even in cases of wrongful and unlawful convictions. It is an insane asylum, when the administrators of law knowingly violate the law holding others to account, but believe that they can NEVER be accountable for their own actions and inactions, costing irreparable harm to individuals’ lives.

Historical Precedents

Throughout history, there have been instances where state court judges have been arrested or convicted, casting doubt on the integrity of their judgments. These cases serve as stark reminders of the dangers of unchecked judicial power and the need for robust oversight mechanisms. Examples of such judges for factual reference are Josef Altstötter, Noel Arrigo, Mark Ciavarella, Jacques Delisle, Thomas J. Maloney, Ernst Pöhner, Oswald Rothaug are just to name a few.

The Legal Framework: 28 U.S. Code § 144

It’s crucial to recognize the legal framework designed to address judicial bias. 28 U.S. Code § 144 stipulates procedures for challenging the bias or prejudice of a judge. However, the effectiveness of these mechanisms is often hindered by institutional barriers and a reluctance to confront entrenched biases within the judiciary.

The Issue of Absolute Immunity

Moreover, the concept of “absolute immunity” further exacerbates the issue of judicial accountability. Judges are granted near-untouchable status, shielded from any repercussions for their actions, no matter how reckless or unjust. This lack of accountability undermines the very foundation of our legal system and erodes public trust in the judiciary.

A Call to Action

It’s imperative that we address these issues head-on. The integrity of our justice system depends on it. We must demand accountability from judges, advocate for reforms that promote fairness and impartiality, and hold those responsible for judicial bias to account.

Conclusion

As I continue my fight for justice, I urge you to join me in speaking out against judicial bias and standing up for the rights enshrined in the Constitution. Together, we can strive towards a legal system that upholds the principles of equality, fairness, and justice for all.

Sincerely,

Ewing Samuels