Posts Tagged :

color of law

Phoenix Police Exposed: Criminal Conspiracy Against Rights & Deprivation of rights under color of law

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

Corruption within law enforcement is not just an isolated incident but often a pattern of systemic issues that pervade entire departments. The Phoenix Police Department (PPD) stands accused of serious wrongdoing, including abuse of authority, criminal conduct, and violations of civil, constitutional, and human rights. My personal experience with the PPD and the findings from the latest Department of Justice (DOJ) investigation reveal a disturbing pattern of criminal conspiracy and deprivation of rights under color of law. This blog aims to shed light on these abuses, backed by irrefutable facts, proofs, and evidence.

A Case of Wrongful Conviction: Ewing Redmond Samuels III

In February 2017, I was wrongfully convicted due to false police reports and an indictment obtained by Phoenix Police Detective Marchele Miller. Despite her criminal history and arrest record by the Chandler Police, which was concealed by the Maricopa County Attorney Lori Eidemanis, David Foster and William Montgomery (now an Arizona Supreme Court Justice), Miller’s fabricated charges led to my unlawful imprisonment. My case exemplifies the habitual and routine pattern of corruption within the PPD and law enforcement in Arizona. Even though Detective Marchele Miller was in possession of all the proof and evidence from the Database of the Phoenix Police Department itself, she chose to engage in kidnapping of my 5 year old child, concealment of the murder of Royce Emmett Walker by the PPD’s confidential informant Jamil Curd, concealment of 5 arrest warrants at the time and at trial, cover-up, criminal conspiracy, and deprivation of rights under color of law all on the account of my race, color, and national origin.

DETECTIVE MARCHELE MILLER
JAMIL TREVON CURD

Key Facts and Evidence

  1. False Police Report and Indictment: Detective Marchele Miller’s false reports and the subsequent indictment were pivotal in my wrongful conviction. Miller’s credibility was compromised by her undisclosed criminal history, which should have disqualified her from any investigatory role, under the law.
  2. DOJ Findings: The recent DOJ investigation into the Phoenix Police Department uncovered widespread abuses and violations of civil rights. The report, which included numerous instances of excessive force, wrongful arrests, and discriminatory practices, supports my claims of systemic corruption.
  3. Criminal Statutes Violated: The actions of the PPD violate Title 18 USC §§ 241 and 242, which pertain to conspiracy against rights and deprivation of rights under color of law. These statutes make it a federal crime for anyone to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in the free exercise of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
  4. Patterns of Misconduct: The DOJ report highlights a pattern of misconduct within the PPD, including:
    • Routine use of excessive force against civilians.
    • Racial profiling and discriminatory practices.
    • Retaliation against individuals who file complaints or speak out against police misconduct.

Specifics from the DOJ Report

  • The report found that officers frequently violated the Fourth Amendment by conducting unlawful searches and seizures.
  • There were multiple documented cases of the PPD’s failure to properly investigate and discipline officers involved in misconduct.
  • Evidence showed that PPD officers often used excessive force against vulnerable populations, including people with disabilities and those experiencing homelessness.
Phoenix-Findings-Report-Final-Final-508Download

Impact on Victims

The systemic corruption within the PPD has had devastating impacts on countless individuals, including myself. These abuses not only result in wrongful convictions but also erode public trust in law enforcement, making communities less safe. Victims of these abuses suffer from long-term psychological, emotional, and financial hardships. I can attest that I will never trust any law enforcement officer from the City of Phoenix, The County of Maricopa and the State of Arizona, even more so the entire United States.

“I will never trust any law enforcement officer from the City of Phoenix, The County of Maricopa and the State of Arizona…”

cyber security expert, Ewing Redmond Samuels III

Conclusion

The Phoenix Police Department’s habitual and routine pattern of criminal conspiracy and deprivation of rights under color of law must be addressed at the highest levels. My wrongful conviction is a testament to the severe consequences of unchecked police misconduct. It is imperative that federal authorities take swift and decisive action to prosecute those responsible under Title 18 USC §§ 241 and 242. Only through accountability and systemic reform can justice be restored, and the civil, constitutional, and human rights of all individuals be safeguarded.

Until Next Time…

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

For more detailed information, including the full DOJ investigation report and supporting documents from my case, please visit ewingsamuels.com.

References

  • United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. “Investigation of the Phoenix Police Department and the City of Phoenix.” [DOJ Report]
  • Title 18 USC §§ 241 and 242 – Conspiracy against rights and deprivation of rights under color of law.

This blog aims to inform and mobilize the public to demand justice and reform within the Phoenix Police Department. By exposing these abuses, we can work towards a future where law enforcement upholds the rights and dignity of every individual.

Juneteenth: A Day of Reflection

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

Juneteenth, celebrated on June 19th, commemorates the day in 1865 when enslaved African Americans in Texas were informed of their freedom, two and a half years after the Emancipation Proclamation. This day holds profound significance as a celebration of freedom and a reminder of the long, ongoing struggle for equality and justice.

The Historical Significance of Juneteenth

Juneteenth marks a pivotal moment in American history. On June 19, 1865, Union General Gordon Granger arrived in Galveston, Texas, and announced General Order No. 3, proclaiming the freedom of all enslaved people in the state. This announcement came more than two years after President Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation, which had legally freed slaves in the Confederate states on January 1, 1863. The delay in enforcement underscores the challenges of ending slavery and the deep-rooted resistance to change.

Juneteenth symbolizes the resilience, strength, and enduring spirit of African Americans. It is a day to honor the contributions of Black Americans to society and recognize ‘their’ ongoing fight for equality.

Systemic Racism in Modern America

Despite the progress since 1865, systemic racism persists in various forms within the United States. Systemic racism refers to the entrenched policies and practices within institutions that disproportionately affect people of color. It manifests in numerous sectors, including criminal justice, education, employment, housing, and healthcare.

Criminal Justice

The criminal justice system is a glaring example of systemic racism. African Americans are incarcerated at nearly five times the rate of white Americans. Disparities in sentencing, police brutality, and racial profiling continue to plague communities of color. For instance, the killing of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer in 2020 sparked global protests and highlighted the urgent need for police reform.

Education

Educational inequities are also prevalent. Schools in predominantly Black and Latino neighborhoods often receive less funding, have less experienced teachers, and offer fewer advanced courses compared to schools in predominantly white areas. The achievement gap between white students and students of color remains significant, perpetuating cycles of poverty and limiting opportunities.

Employment and Economic Disparities

Racial discrimination in the labor market contributes to significant wage gaps. Black workers earn less than their white counterparts and face higher unemployment rates. According to the Economic Policy Institute, in 2020, the median hourly wage for Black workers was 75.6% of the median wage for white workers.

Housing

Discriminatory housing policies, such as redlining and predatory lending, have historically prevented Black families from owning homes and building wealth. The legacy of these practices continues to impact homeownership rates and wealth accumulation. The Urban Institute found that Black homeownership rates were significantly lower than those of white households, contributing to a substantial racial wealth gap.

Healthcare

Racial disparities in healthcare access and outcomes are stark. Black Americans are more likely to suffer from chronic conditions, receive lower quality care, and have higher mortality rates. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these disparities, with Black and Latino communities experiencing disproportionately higher rates of infection and death.

Government Policies and Practices

State and federal government agencies have been implicated in perpetuating systemic racism through policies that appear neutral but have discriminatory effects. The United States government is guilty of multiple human rights abuses and fundamental freedoms and knowingly continues to do so with impunity. (United Nations OHCHR)

Examples include:

  1. Voter Suppression: Laws that impose strict voter ID requirements, reduce early voting, and purge voter rolls disproportionately affect communities of color, undermining their political power and representation.
  2. Immigration Enforcement: Practices by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) often target individuals based on their race and national origin, leading to disproportionate detentions and deportations of people from Latin American countries.
  3. Sentencing Laws: Federal and state sentencing guidelines, particularly for drug offenses, have disproportionately impacted Black and Latino individuals. The harsh penalties for crack cocaine versus powder cocaine, for example, have led to significant racial disparities in incarceration rates.
  4. Housing Policies: Federal housing policies have historically discriminated against people of color, and current practices continue to reflect these biases. For example, mortgage lending discrimination remains a significant barrier for Black and Latino homebuyers.

The Path Forward

Recognizing the reality of systemic racism is the first step toward meaningful change. It requires a commitment to examining and dismantling discriminatory practices within all institutions. Advocacy for policy reforms, increased funding for education and healthcare in underserved communities, and criminal justice reform are crucial steps toward achieving equity.

On Juneteenth, as freedom is celebrated, let us also reaffirm our commitment to fighting for justice and equality. By acknowledging the ongoing struggles and working collectively to address systemic racism, we honor the legacy of those who fought for freedom and pave the way for a more just and equitable society.

Sources

  1. NAACP Legal Defense Fund. (2020). “Justice in Policing Act.” Retrieved from naacpldf.org.
  2. Economic Policy Institute. (2020). “Black-White Wage Gaps Expand with Rising Wage Inequality.” Retrieved from epi.org.
  3. Urban Institute. (2019). “Housing Discrimination Still Plagues the U.S.” Retrieved from urban.org.
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2021). “Health Disparities.” Retrieved from cdc.gov.

By understanding and addressing these issues, we can ensure that Juneteenth is not just a day of celebration, but also a call to action for a fair and just future for all.

Until Next Time…

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

The Transformative Power of Artificial Intelligence: Redefining Industries, Nations, and Governance

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands at the precipice of transforming our world in ways that are both profound and unprecedented. As we delve into this technological revolution, it becomes evident that AI will drastically change and impact all industries, nations, and governments. From enhancing efficiency and innovation to challenging existing power structures, AI is set to reshape our future. This blog explores the specifics of AI’s transformative power and highlights its potential to expose and address fraudulent practices, particularly within systems like the American criminal justice system.

The Revolutionary Impact on Industries

AI’s impact on industries is already being felt, and its potential to drive innovation and efficiency is immense.

Healthcare

In healthcare, AI is revolutionizing diagnostics and treatment plans. Algorithms can analyze vast amounts of medical data to identify patterns and predict outcomes, leading to earlier and more accurate diagnoses. For instance, AI systems like IBM Watson are being used to recommend personalized treatment plans for cancer patients based on their genetic makeup and medical history.

Finance

The financial sector is leveraging AI to enhance security, reduce fraud, and optimize trading strategies. AI-driven systems can detect fraudulent activities by analyzing transaction patterns and identifying anomalies that would be missed by human auditors. According to a report by McKinsey, AI could potentially deliver up to $1 trillion of additional value each year in the global banking sector.

Manufacturing

In manufacturing, AI-powered robots and automation are increasing productivity and reducing errors. Predictive maintenance, driven by AI, can foresee equipment failures before they occur, saving companies significant amounts of money and reducing downtime. A study by PwC estimates that AI could contribute up to $15.7 trillion to the global economy by 2030, with manufacturing being one of the key beneficiaries.

AI and National Economies

Nations are also set to benefit immensely from AI, with potential economic boosts and enhanced public services.

Economic Growth

AI-driven innovation is expected to significantly contribute to economic growth. Countries investing heavily in AI research and development, such as China and the United States, are poised to dominate the global AI landscape. According to a study by PwC, AI could boost global GDP by 14% by 2030.

Public Services

Governments can use AI to improve public services, from traffic management to healthcare. For instance, AI can optimize traffic flow in cities, reducing congestion and emissions. In healthcare, AI can help manage public health crises by predicting disease outbreaks and optimizing resource allocation.

The Ethical and Governance Challenges

While AI holds great promise, it also presents significant ethical and governance challenges. The deployment of AI in governance must be approached with caution to ensure that it is used ethically and responsibly.

AI in Criminal Justice

One of the most contentious areas of AI application is within the criminal justice system. AI has the potential to both reform and exacerbate existing issues in this sector.

Exposing Fraudulent Practices

AI can be a powerful tool in exposing fraudulent practices within the criminal justice system. For instance, AI algorithms can analyze vast amounts of legal documents, trial transcripts, and other records to identify inconsistencies, biases, and potential miscarriages of justice. AI-driven forensic analysis can also authenticate or debunk evidence such as video footage and photographs, which are often used to unjustly imprison individuals.

Ensuring Accountability

AI can also enhance accountability within the criminal justice system. By analyzing data on arrests, sentencing, and incarceration, AI can highlight patterns of racial or socioeconomic bias. This can lead to more transparent and fairer legal processes. For example, the use of AI in predictive policing must be carefully monitored to avoid reinforcing existing biases and ensuring that it is used to protect rather than oppress communities.

Protecting Human Rights

Governments must ensure that AI technologies are used to uphold, rather than undermine, human rights. This includes establishing robust legal frameworks to govern the use of AI, ensuring transparency in AI decision-making processes, and protecting individuals’ privacy and civil liberties.

About Skyview A.I. GSE

At the forefront of this AI revolution is Skyview A.I. GSE, a company specializing in data intelligence and artificial intelligence. Skyview A.I. GSE leverages advanced AI technologies to provide innovative solutions across various sectors. Our expertise in data intelligence allows us to harness the power of AI to analyze complex datasets, uncover insights, and drive strategic decision-making. With a commitment to ethical AI practices, Skyview A.I. GSE is dedicated to transforming industries and improving societal outcomes through the responsible application of artificial intelligence.

Conclusion

The transformative power of AI is undeniable. It holds the potential to revolutionize industries, drive economic growth, and enhance public services. However, with great power comes great responsibility. As AI continues to evolve, it is crucial to address the ethical and governance challenges it presents. By doing so, we can harness AI’s potential to create a more just, equitable, and prosperous world.

In the context of the American criminal justice system, AI offers a unique opportunity to expose and rectify fraudulent practices, ensuring that justice is served fairly and transparently. As we move forward into this AI-driven future, it is imperative that we remain vigilant and proactive in addressing the ethical implications of this powerful technology.

For further insights and updates on the impact of AI across various sectors, stay tuned to ewingsamuels.com. Together, we can explore the transformative potential of AI and work towards a more just and equitable future.

Until Next Time…

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

References

  1. IBM Watson Health. (2023). IBM Watson for Oncology. Retrieved from IBM Watson Health
  2. McKinsey & Company. (2023). AI in Banking: Value Creation, Risk, and Transformation. Retrieved from McKinsey & Company
  3. PwC. (2017). Sizing the prize: What’s the real value of AI for your business and how can you capitalize?. Retrieved from PwC
  4. PwC. (2017). The Economic Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the World Economy. Retrieved from PwC

Parallels Between The United States and Nazi Germany: A Comparative Analysis

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

Today, I want to delve into a critical issue that resonates deeply with my personal experiences and the broader discourse on justice and human rights. This blog explores the unsettling parallels between law enforcement practices in the current United States and those in Nazi Germany. Specifically, it examines the use of law and power to arrest, kidnap, hold hostage, torture, seize assets, and commit murder under the guise of legality. By highlighting specific laws and actions by authorities, I aim to underscore the severity of these issues and call for urgent reforms.

Historical Context: Nazi Germany

Under Adolf Hitler‘s regime, Nazi Germany utilized law enforcement as a tool of oppression, systematically targeting Jews, political dissidents, and other marginalized groups. The Gestapo (secret police) and the SS (Schutzstaffel) were notorious for their brutal tactics, which included arbitrary arrests, torture, and extrajudicial killings. The Nuremberg Laws institutionalized racial discrimination, stripping Jews of their citizenship and rights. The Holocaust, one of history’s most horrific genocides, was perpetrated under the pretense of legal authority.

“I don’t see much future for the Americans … it’s a decayed country. And they have their racial problem, and the problem of social inequalities … my feelings against Americanism are feelings of hatred and deep repugnance … everything about the behaviour of American society reveals that it’s half Judaised, and the other half negrified. How can one expect a State like that to hold together?”

Adolf Hitler

Modern United States: A Disturbing Parallel

While the United States prides itself on being a beacon of democracy and justice, recent practices reveal troubling parallels with Nazi Germany. This comparison is not made lightly but is grounded in documented instances of systemic abuse, particularly against non-white citizens and residents. It already has a history of customs rooted in white supremacy.

Even more disturbing is those in power in the United States who control the country and its law enforcement mechanisms (Quite Interesting):

Arbitrary Arrests and Kidnappings

The United States has seen numerous instances where law enforcement agencies have exercised their power to arrest and detain individuals without due process. The Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency, for example, has been criticized for its tactics in detaining immigrants, often in ways that resemble kidnappings. In 2020, reports emerged of federal agents in unmarked vehicles detaining protesters in Portland, Oregon, without identifying themselves or providing a legal basis for the arrests.

“It was done to move detainees to a safe location for questioning.”

Homeland Security Acting Deputy Secretary Ken Cuccinelli

Torture and Inhumane Treatment

The use of torture by U.S. authorities has been a controversial issue, particularly in the context of the War on Terror. The CIA’s use of enhanced interrogation techniques, which many consider to be torture, has drawn widespread condemnation. Similarly, reports of inhumane conditions in detention centers, including those operated by ICE, have highlighted the maltreatment of detainees, often involving physical and psychological abuse.

Asset Seizure and Civil Forfeiture

Civil asset forfeiture laws in the United States allow law enforcement agencies to seize property suspected of being connected to criminal activity, often without charging the property owner with a crime. This practice has disproportionately affected non-white communities. In many cases, individuals have had their assets seized without due process, echoing the expropriation of property from Jews and other marginalized groups in Nazi Germany. It is now being perpetrated against communities of people of color.

“The fact of the matter is very rare for an unarmed African American to be shot by a white police officer.”

Former Attorney General, DOJ, William Barr

Extrajudicial Killings

The extrajudicial killings of unarmed Black individuals by police officers in the United States have sparked nationwide protests and calls for reform. The deaths of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Alton Sterling, Stephon Clark, Eric Garner, Ronald Greene, Elijah McClain, Tyre Nichols, and countless others reflect a pattern of lethal force used disproportionately against non-white citizens. These incidents draw a stark comparison to the state-sanctioned murders carried out by Nazi Germany under the guise of maintaining law and order. The former Attorney General of DOJ, William Barr proved the audacity and deliberateness of the denial of the existence of systemic racism flies in the face of information  from nongovernmental groups, the Justice Department’s own data, and the lived experiences of Black people in the US.

Legal Frameworks and Authorities

The Patriot Act

The USA PATRIOT Act, enacted in response to the 9/11 attacks, expanded the government’s surveillance and investigative powers. Critics argue that it undermines civil liberties and has been used to target marginalized communities, much like the Reichstag Fire Decree and the Enabling Act enabled the Nazi regime to bypass legal constraints and persecute dissidents.

Qualified Immunity

Qualified immunity shields law enforcement officers from being held personally liable for actions performed in the line of duty, unless they violated “clearly established” rights. This doctrine has been criticized for enabling police misconduct and preventing accountability, paralleling the impunity enjoyed by Nazi officers who committed atrocities under state orders.

Absolute Immunity for Prosecutors and Judges

One of the most egregious aspects of the U.S. legal system is the concept of absolute immunity for prosecutors and judges. This legal doctrine protects these officials from being held accountable for their actions, even when they knowingly violate the law. Prosecutors can present false evidence, suppress exculpatory evidence, and engage in misconduct without fear of personal consequences. Judges, similarly, can make biased and unlawful rulings with impunity. This lack of accountability mirrors the unchecked power wielded by Nazi officials, who committed atrocities without fear of retribution.

Executive Orders and Directives

Executive orders and directives, such as the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” immigration policy, have led to widespread human rights abuses. This policy resulted in family separations and the detention of thousands of children, drawing parallels to the state-sanctioned abductions and internments in Nazi Germany.

A Personal Note

My understanding and perspective on these issues are not merely academic or theoretical—they are deeply personal. I have experienced firsthand the American criminal justice system in the state courts of Arizona, the family courts of Arizona, the immigration system in the federal courts, and its supposed ‘appellate process’. In each of these arenas, I encountered egregious violations of state court rules, the United States Constitution, fundamental freedoms, and the global consensus on human rights laws it cannot grant nor withdraw. These violations were not just incidental but were committed knowingly by those in positions of power, highlighting a systemic problem that mirrors some of the darkest chapters in history.

“The American Criminal Justice System apparatus is hopelessly opaque, concealing racist aims behind contorted justifications..”

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

Conclusion

The parallels between law enforcement practices in the current United States and Nazi Germany are deeply troubling. Both systems have utilized legal frameworks to justify acts of oppression, targeting marginalized groups under the guise of maintaining order and security. It is imperative that we recognize these patterns and advocate for reforms that uphold justice, accountability, and human rights for all.

By drawing attention to these issues, I hope to contribute to a broader movement for change and justice. It is through awareness and collective action that we can prevent history from repeating itself and ensure a more just and equitable future for everyone.

Thank you for reading.

Until Next Time…

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

Government Double Standards 2

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

In today’s society, the actions of governments and those of ordinary individuals are often judged by vastly different standards, despite sometimes being fundamentally similar. Governments possess the unique ability to redefine behaviors that would otherwise be considered criminal if committed by private citizens, using specific laws and statutes to justify their actions. This blog explores numerous examples that illustrate these double standards:

Government Surveillance vs. Unauthorized Surveillance

When Government Does It, it is called government surveillance, authorized under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978, particularly Section 702. When anybody else does it, it’s unauthorized surveillance, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 2511 – Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited.

Military Detention vs. Unlawful Detention

When Government Does It, it is called military detention, authorized under the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) of 2001. When anybody else does it, it’s unlawful detention, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law.

Forced Vaccination vs. Assault

When Government Does It, it is called forced vaccination, under laws such as 42 U.S. Code § 264 – Regulations to control communicable diseases. When anybody else does it, it’s assault, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 113 – Assaults within maritime and territorial jurisdiction.

Civil Commitment vs. False Imprisonment

When Government Does It, it is called civil commitment, under laws like 42 U.S. Code § 10802 – Protection and advocacy of mentally ill individuals. When anybody else does it, it’s false imprisonment, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 1201 – Kidnapping.

Government Propaganda vs. Fraud

When Government Does It, it is called government propaganda, under laws such as the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948. When anybody else does it, it’s fraud, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 1341 – Frauds and swindles.

Border Control vs. Human Trafficking

When Government Does It, it is called border control, under laws like the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). When anybody else does it, it’s human trafficking, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 1589 – Forced labor.

Government Sanctions vs. Economic Coercion

When Government Does It, it is called government sanctions, authorized under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). When anybody else does it, it’s economic coercion, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 1951 – Interference with commerce by threats or violence.

Asset Seizure vs. Burglary

When Government Does It, it is called asset seizure, under laws like 21 U.S. Code § 881 – Forfeitures. When anybody else does it, it’s burglary, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 2113 – Bank robbery and incidental crimes.

National Defense vs. Armed Assault

When Government Does It, it is called national defense, under laws like 10 U.S. Code § 5063 – Marine Corps: composition and functions. When anybody else does it, it’s armed assault, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 111 – Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees.

Government Immunity vs. Evading Prosecution

When Government Does It, it is called government immunity, under laws like the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S. Code § 2671). When anybody else does it, it’s evading prosecution, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 1073 – Flight to avoid prosecution or giving testimony.

Conclusion

These examples highlight the profound power imbalance and the different legal justifications that governments employ, which often criminalize similar behaviors by individuals. This disparity underscores the need for continued scrutiny and accountability in the actions of those in power.

Until Next Time…

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

The Reality of Legal Representation in the U.S.A.

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

“Racism and classism are a manifestation of a culture that has no genuine morals and can only elevate itself by subjugating others.”

Shahid K. Bolsen

Introduction

The United States prides itself on being a nation of laws, where justice is a fundamental pillar of society. However, for millions of people, this ideal is far from reality. With over 2.5 million individuals incarcerated in state and federal prisons, the American criminal justice system seems to be more of an industry of profit rather than a beacon of justice. This situation begs the question: Are lawyers truly fighting for the legal and constitutional rights of their clients, or is their advocacy driven primarily by personal gain?

The Role of Lawyers: Ideals vs. Reality

Lawyers are often seen as the defenders of justice, the ones who stand up for the oppressed and ensure that everyone receives a fair trial. This is the idealistic view that many people hold, inspired by courtroom dramas and the noble image of legal warriors. However, the reality is more complex and, often, disheartening.

In practice, many lawyers are motivated by financial incentives rather than a pure dedication to justice. This is not to say that all lawyers are indifferent to their clients’ rights, but the system itself encourages a focus on profit. Legal fees, billable hours, and the potential for lucrative settlements can sometimes overshadow the fundamental mission of defending constitutional rights. The prison population is also a direct reflection of what lawyers in the United States is doing and not doing.

The Profit-Driven Justice System

The staggering number of incarcerated individuals in the United States highlights a systemic issue. The criminal justice system, including its legal representatives, often operates as a business. From private prisons that benefit from high incarceration rates to legal professionals who may prioritize high-paying cases, the focus can shift from justice to profitability.

The situation becomes even more dire when considering public defenders. These lawyers, who are supposed to represent those who cannot afford private counsel, are often overworked and underpaid. With excessive caseloads and limited resources, public defenders may struggle to provide the vigorous defense that every defendant deserves. This imbalance leads to a higher likelihood of plea deals and wrongful convictions, contributing to the swelling prison population.

Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics

Personal Experience: A Case Study in Systemic Failure

My own experience underscores the flaws in the system. Wrongfully convicted and imprisoned, I encountered a legal landscape where my constitutional rights were outright overlooked. My case was not unique; countless others face similar injustices, trapped in a system that seems more concerned with maintaining its own mechanisms than ensuring fair treatment for all. My case also gives indisputable proof that the State wins cases on technicalities and not merits, with the system itself engaged in concerted actions to protect itself, completely denying you justice.

Throughout my ordeal, it became evident that many lawyers are selective in their battles, often influenced by the potential for personal gain. This selective advocacy means that those without substantial financial resources or high-profile cases may receive subpar representation, perpetuating cycles of injustice and incarceration.

“The American Criminal Justice system has a well-known history of ignoring facts and relying on prejudice.”

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

10 Eye-Opening Facts About Criminal Justice

1) Mass Incarceration: There are currently over 2 million people incarcerated in the U.S., and an additional 5 million under correctional supervision (on probation or parole).

2) Race: People of color are disproportionately represented in the criminal justice system. Applying 1996 incarceration rates, the lifetime chances of spending time behind bars is 1 in 4 for African-American males; 1 in 6 for Latino males; and 1 in 23 for white males.

3) Poverty: The majority of people in prison are poor-60% of women and 40% of men in U.S. State prisons were unemployed before their arrest. 

4) Gender: The rates of incarceration for women in New York State increased by about 500% between 1974 and 2004 (more than double the rate of increase for men). The lifetime chances of going to prison are six times as high for African-American women as for white women. 

5) Drugs: A 1997 survey of State prison inmates revealed that a third committed their offense while under the influence of drugs.

6) Families: Most people who are incarcerated are parents–75% of incarcerated women are mothers; 66% of incarcerated men are fathers. Ten million children in the U.S. have a parent who is currently or was recently under some form of criminal justice supervision (incarcerated, or on probation, or parole).

7) Youth & Juvenile Justice: In 2003, 112,000 young people were in juvenile institutions nationwide, mostly for property offenses.

8) Displaced Resources: The U.S. Census counts prisoners as part of a prison county’s population–rather than as residents of the communities they originated from. Federal resources and political representation are granted based on population, so this practice displaces needed resources and political representation away from already struggling communities to the mostly rural areas that “house” prisoners. 

9) Profits: Contracts for other services-such as security technology, vending machines, and products sold at elevated prices at the “commissary,” where prisoners buy toiletries, food, and other necessities-also generate profits.

10) Voter Disenfranchisement: In most states, those convicted of felony crimes are barred from voting for a period of time after their release; in some States, they are banned for life. 

Source: Barry Chaffkin & Tanya Krupat , Coalition 2007 Conference Presentation

A Call for Change

The American criminal justice system needs a profound transformation. Lawyers should be advocates for justice, not merely participants in a profit-driven industry. This shift requires systemic changes, including better funding and support for public defenders, reforms in sentencing laws, and a reevaluation of the incentives that drive legal practice.

We must also hold legal professionals accountable, ensuring that they uphold their duty to fight for their clients’ legal and constitutional rights. Advocacy should not be a selective process based on potential rewards but a consistent commitment to justice for all.

Conclusion

The over 2.5 million people incarcerated in the United States serve as a testament to a system in dire need of reform. Lawyers play a crucial role in this system, and their motivations can significantly impact outcomes. It is time to move away from a profit-driven approach and towards a model of legal representation that genuinely prioritizes justice, fairness, and the protection of constitutional rights. Only then can we begin to address the deep-seated issues that plague our criminal justice system and ensure that it serves all individuals equitably.

Until Next Time…

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

Dwane Cates: P.O.S. Attorney 2

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

In my relentless pursuit of justice, it is imperative to highlight the misconduct and legal violations committed by my former attorney, Dwane Cates. This blog post will detail the specific laws and professional rules he broke during his representation of my case and trial. Understanding these violations is crucial, not just for my case, but for anyone seeking justice and fair representation.

State Bar of Arizona Professional Rules of Conduct Violations

  1. Rule 1.1 – Competence
    • Dwane Cates failed to provide competent representation by not adequately preparing for my defense. His lack of preparation and understanding of the complexities of my case led to inadequate representation, violating Rule 1.1, which requires lawyers to provide competent representation to their clients.
  2. Rule 1.3 – Diligence
    • Rule 1.3 mandates that a lawyer must act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client. Cates neglected important aspects of my case, including failing to investigate key evidence and witnesses that could have exonerated me, thus failing to meet this standard of diligence. He filed no motions in my case on my behalf whatsoever.
  3. Rule 1.4 – Communication
    • Effective communication is critical in legal representation. Cates violated Rule 1.4 by failing to keep me informed about the status of my case and not explaining legal matters in a manner that allowed me to make informed decisions.
  4. Rule 1.7 – Conflict of Interest
    • Rule 1.7 prohibits a lawyer from representing a client if there is a significant risk that the lawyer’s interests or other clients’ interests will materially limit their ability to represent the client. Cates had undisclosed conflicts of interest that compromised his ability to represent me impartially and effectively.

American Bar Association (ABA) Rules Violations

  1. Rule 3.1 – Meritorious Claims and Contentions
    • The ABA Rule 3.1 requires that a lawyer should not bring or defend a proceeding unless there is a basis in law and fact for doing so that is not frivolous. Cates pursued defenses and arguments without a solid factual basis, wasting valuable resources and undermining my defense.
  2. Rule 8.4 – Misconduct
    • This rule prohibits lawyers from engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation. Cates’s actions, including misrepresenting facts and failing to disclose crucial information, clearly violate this rule.

Federal Laws and Constitutional Violations

  1. Sixth Amendment – Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel
    • The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to effective assistance of counsel. Cates’s inadequate preparation, lack of communication, and conflicts of interest resulted in ineffective assistance, directly violating my constitutional rights under the Sixth Amendment.

State Rules of Court Violations

  1. Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 15 – Disclosure and Discovery
    • Rule 15 requires timely disclosure of evidence by both the prosecution and defense. Cates failed to utilize discovery rules effectively, neglecting to obtain exculpatory evidence that could have been crucial to my defense.

Attorney Dwane Cates evinces ineptitude, inadequacy, and incompetence, by a complete and total failure, and looked as if he did not even bother to investigate the State’s case and star witness, Jamil Trevon Curd (JTC), who was arrested 10 times before this case, with at least 25 Phoenix Police Department Incident reports of residential burglary, aggravated assaults, dui, domestic violence, criminal damage, disorderly conduct, 5 arrest warrants, and a pending investigation into the death of Royce Emmett Walker on May 21, 2015. 

“5 arrest warrants, and a pending investigation into the death of Royce Emmett Walker on May 21, 2015 was concealed by Deputy County Attorney Lori Eidemanis of the Maricopa County Attorney Office (MCAO). Dwane Cates failed in his duties completely.”

Ewing redmond Samuels III

The State of Arizona’s case against me was largely constructed on Detective Marchele Miller‘s report, which was rife with omissions and deliberate falsehoods. Despite possessing facts that could have demonstrated my innocence, Miller chose to suppress this crucial information, thereby distorting the narrative and fabricating evidence to fit a predetermined conclusion of guilt. Her actions not only tainted the integrity of the investigation but also played a significant role in the wrongful conviction that followed, highlighting a grave miscarriage of justice. Marchele Miller was arrested on February 23, 2012 by the Chandler Police Department.

Attorney Dwane Cates did not obtain this information to challenge the veracity and truthfulness of her statements at trial and the report she authored, filled with deliberate falsehoods that was easy to refute with facts and evidence. He allowed the word of a corrupt Detective to violate an individual with high government security clearance as a Cyber Security Expert and Analyst.

“Detective Marchele Miller was arrested on February 23, 2012 by the Chandler Police Department.”

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

Federal Statutes and Case Law

  1. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)
    • This landmark case sets the standard for determining ineffective assistance of counsel. According to Strickland, a defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient and that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. Cates’s actions meet both prongs of this test, as his incompetence and neglect clearly impacted the outcome of my case.
  2. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)
    • Under Brady, the prosecution is required to disclose evidence favorable to the defendant. While this is a prosecutorial duty, Cates failed to demand such disclosures aggressively, a failure that compromised my defense.

Conclusion

Attorney Dwane Cates’s conduct during my case and trial was a clear breach of numerous professional and legal standards. His violations of the State Bar of Arizona Professional Rules of Conduct, American Bar Association Rules, Federal Laws, State Rules of Court, and critical case laws such as Strickland and Brady, resulted in the gross miscarriage of justice I experienced. It is my hope that by exposing these violations, I can not only seek redress for myself but also warn others of the potential pitfalls in their pursuit of justice.

Call to Action

I urge those who have faced similar injustices to come forward and share their stories. Together, we can push for accountability and reform within the legal system. For more detailed information and updates on my case, please visit my website regularly.

Until Next Time…

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

Dwane Cates: P.O.S. Attorney

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

An Incompetent Defense and a Conspiracy Against Rights

In the complex and often harsh world of the legal system, the importance of competent legal representation cannot be overstated. Unfortunately, in my case—State of Arizona vs. Ewing Samuels—the very cornerstone of justice was undermined by the ineptitude and incompetence of my attorney, Dwane Cates. His ineffective assistance did not just fall short of acceptable legal standards; it actively contributed to a miscarriage of justice, supported by evidence of collusion with Lori Eidemanis and the Maricopa County Attorney Office.

Dwane Cates: A Breach of Duty

When I was accused of a crime I did not commit, I placed my trust in Dwane Cates, hoping for a robust defense that would uphold my rights and deliver justice. However, throughout the trial, it became evident that Cates failed to meet the basic obligations of his role:

  1. Lack of Preparation: From the outset, Cates demonstrated a severe lack of preparation. He failed to investigate crucial evidence that could have proven my innocence and neglected to interview key witnesses whose testimonies would have been pivotal.
  2. Inadequate Legal Strategy: His legal strategy, if it can be called that, was riddled with errors and glaring omissions. He did not file necessary motions that could have challenged the prosecution’s evidence or highlighted procedural errors, thereby failing to protect my constitutional rights.
  3. Poor Communication: Throughout the proceedings, Cates maintained poor communication with me. Important decisions were made without my input or understanding, leaving me uninformed and unable to participate meaningfully in my own defense.
  4. Criminal Conduct: Dwane Cates had personally asked me to ask JTC’s mother Alisa Michelle Hudson for him to ‘go away’ or leave the State until after the case is over when I met with him at his office on 1747 E. Morten, Suite 205. Phoenix, Arizona 85020 in 2016. I was shocked and looked at him like he lost his mind.
  5. Absolutely No Investigation Into The Facts Thereof: A simple background check into the state’s witness would have shown:

“The State’s case was built on the word of an individual, JTC, who was arrested 10 times before this case, with at least 25 Phoenix Police Department Incident reports, 5 arrest warrants, and a pending investigation into the death of Royce Emmett Walker on May 21, 2015. All concealed by Deputy County Attorney Lori Eidemanis. Dwane Cates representation is questionable all around.”

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

The State’s case was built on the word of an individual, JTC, who was arrested 10 times before this case, with at least 25 Phoenix Police Department Incident reports of residential burglary, aggravated assaults, dui, domestic violence, criminal damage, disorderly conduct, 5 arrest warrants, and a pending investigation into the death of Royce Emmett Walker on May 21, 2015. None of these items were even mentioned in trial, yet the prosecution did its best to impugn my background, even though I was never arrested nor had any criminal history prior to this so called ‘criminal case’. Dwane Cates representation is questionable all around.

“The prosecution (Deputy County Attorney Lori Eidemanis of MCAO) did its best to impugn my background, even though I was never arrested nor had any criminal history prior to this so called ‘criminal case’.”

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

The State of Arizona’s case against me was largely constructed on Detective Marchele Miller‘s report, which was rife with omissions and deliberate falsehoods. Despite possessing facts that could have demonstrated my innocence, Miller chose to suppress this crucial information, thereby distorting the narrative and fabricating evidence to fit a predetermined conclusion of guilt. Her actions not only tainted the integrity of the investigation but also played a significant role in the wrongful conviction that followed, highlighting a grave miscarriage of justice. Marchele Miller was arrestedon February 23, 2012 by the Chandler Police Department.

This report is filled of her racism, deception, propensity for dishonesty, violence, and immoral behavior.

“The Sixth Amendment right to counsel is the right to the effective assistance of counsel, and the benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.”

Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)

Evidence of Conspiracy

What is more alarming than Cates’ incompetence is the emerging evidence suggesting a deliberate conspiracy against my rights (18 U.S.C. § 241). The records indicate that Cates did not merely fail to defend me adequately but actively collaborated with the prosecution Lori Eidemanis and the Maricopa County Attorney Office to ensure a guilty verdict:

  1. Collusion with the Prosecution: There is substantial proof that Cates engaged in backdoor communications with the State Attorney’s Office, discussing strategies that were against my interests and designed to weaken my defense.
  2. Deliberate Sabotage: Specific actions taken by Cates, such as the deliberate suppression of exculpatory evidence and failure to cross-examine key prosecution witnesses effectively, strongly imply that his ineffective assistance was not merely due to incompetence but was a part of a concerted effort to ensure my conviction.
  3. Violation of Constitutional Rights: This conspiracy against rights is a severe violation of my legal and constitutional protections. The right to effective counsel is enshrined in the Sixth Amendment, and the deliberate denial of this right constitutes a grave injustice.

“The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office has a long history of paying witnesses to testify and commit perjury, nondisclosure, and collusion with defense attorney’s, as they call it give me the case and I’ll throw you a bone here and there.”

Ewing R. Samuels III

The Path to Justice

The wrongful conviction and subsequent imprisonment were a direct result of Dwane Cates’ incompetence and the malicious collusion with the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office. This case is not just about one individual’s failure but a systemic abuse that requires accountability and redress.

Moving Forward

  1. Legal Action: I am committed to pursuing all legal avenues to overturn this unjust conviction and to hold those responsible accountable for their actions. This includes filing for post-conviction relief based on the ineffective assistance of counsel and exploring civil actions for the conspiracy against my rights.
  2. Public Awareness: Sharing my story is crucial. By exposing the details of this case, I aim to shed light on the broader issues within the justice system, advocating for reforms that will prevent others from suffering similar fates.
  3. Advocacy for Reform: My experience underscores the need for systemic changes. Advocacy for stricter oversight of legal counsel performance and greater transparency within prosecutorial conduct is essential to protect the rights of all individuals.

Conclusion

The ordeal I faced due to Dwane Cates’ incompetence and the malicious conspiracy against my rights is a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities within our legal system. My fight is not just for personal justice but for a more equitable system where such injustices cannot occur. Through continued legal action and raising public awareness, I am determined to seek justice and ensure that my case serves as a catalyst for necessary reforms.

To reiterate, these are not just Sixth Amendment violations, but are criminal violations under Federal laws. As they say, “no one is above the law”.

For more details about my case and ongoing efforts, please stay tuned as I dissect my case from beginning to present. Join me in advocating for justice and accountability.

Until Next Time…

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

Invisible Scars: The Toll Of Imprisonment And Its Lifelong Impact

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

Imprisonment is a harsh reality for many, but its effects extend far beyond the prison walls. The psychological trauma endured during incarceration can have profound and lasting impacts on an individual’s mental health, life outcomes, and overall outlook on life. This blog explores these effects, supported by statistics from reputable government agencies, and underscores the urgent need for reform and support for those reentering society.

Mental Health Effects of Imprisonment

Imprisonment often exposes individuals to a range of stressors, including isolation, violence, murder, torture, and a lack of autonomy. These conditions can lead to various mental health issues, such as:

  1. Depression and Anxiety: According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, more than half of all prison and jail inmates in the U.S. have a mental health problem, with depression and anxiety being among the most common issues.
  2. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): The National Institutes of Health (NIH) reports that 21% of prisoners have experienced PTSD, stemming from traumatic events during incarceration.
  3. Substance Abuse Disorders: Many inmates struggle with substance abuse issues, which are often exacerbated by the prison environment. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) found that around 58% of state prisoners and 63% of sentenced jail inmates meet the criteria for drug dependence or abuse.

The Adverse Impact on Life Outcomes

The effects of imprisonment are not confined to the time spent behind bars. They extend into every aspect of an individual’s life post-release, influencing their social, economic, and psychological well-being.

  1. Employment and Income: Former inmates face significant barriers to employment. The Bureau of Justice Statistics indicates that two-thirds of released prisoners were not employed within five years of their release. Those who do find work often earn significantly less than their peers, perpetuating a cycle of poverty.
  2. Education: Imprisonment can disrupt educational pursuits. Data from the U.S. Department of Education shows that only 14% of prisoners have some college education, compared to 48% of the general population.
  3. Recidivism: Mental health issues and lack of support can lead to high recidivism rates. The National Institute of Justice reports that within five years of release, about 76.6% of released prisoners are rearrested.

My Personal Journey

As someone who has experienced the full brunt of the prison system, I can attest to the deep and lasting impacts it has on one’s mental health and overall life. My name is Ewing Redmond Samuels III. Born in Belize City, Belize, in 1978, I emigrated to the United States as a child and built a life there, only to have it upended by a wrongful and unlawful conviction. After serving 6.5 years in the Arizona Department of Corrections and additional time in federal custody, I was deported back to Belize in 2023.

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) defines deportation or forcible transfer of a population as a crime against humanity. The ICC is located in The Hague and prosecutes individuals accused of crimes against humanity, which are serious violations committed against a civilian population. Deportation is defined as the displacement of people across an international border. Forcing people to leave their place of residence through expulsion or other coercive acts for reasons not permitted by international law could be a crime against humanity, a war crime, or both. The 15 forms of crimes against humanity listed in the Rome Statute include offences such as murder, rape, imprisonment, enforced disappearances, enslavement – particularly of women and children, sexual slavery, torture, apartheid and deportation.

Rome Statute of The International Criminal Court

Even though I now live in the paradise of the tropical Caribbean, the shadows of my incarceration linger. I struggle daily with a multitude of personal and professional challenges. The trauma has not only affected me but has also profoundly impacted my son, leaving us both grappling with lifelong scars.

Despite my 20 years of experience as a software engineer in Silicon Valley, and my extensive background as a business consultant and music and film producer, reintegration has been an uphill battle. The stigma of my past and the psychological toll of my experiences continue to pose significant hurdles.

Outlook on Life

The psychological toll of imprisonment can fundamentally alter an individual’s outlook on life. Feelings of hopelessness, mistrust, and social withdrawal are common among former inmates.

  1. Hopelessness and Despair: Prolonged exposure to the harsh conditions of prison life can lead to chronic feelings of hopelessness and despair, which can hinder reintegration efforts.
  2. Mistrust and Social Withdrawal: Many former inmates develop a deep-seated mistrust of others and often withdraw from social interactions. This isolation can prevent them from building the social support networks necessary for successful reintegration.
  3. Stigma and Discrimination: The stigma associated with a criminal record can lead to social and institutional discrimination, further alienating former inmates and diminishing their sense of self-worth.

The Need for Reform and Support

Addressing the mental health needs of inmates and providing comprehensive support post-release is crucial for improving life outcomes and reducing recidivism. Here are some steps that can make a difference:

  1. Mental Health Services: Increasing access to mental health services in prisons and jails can help mitigate some of the adverse effects of incarceration.
  2. Educational and Vocational Training: Providing inmates with educational and vocational training can improve their employment prospects post-release.
  3. Support Networks: Establishing robust support networks, including counseling, mentorship programs, and community support, can aid in the reintegration process.

Conclusion

The mental health effects of imprisonment are profound and far-reaching, influencing every aspect of an individual’s life post-release. By understanding these impacts and advocating for comprehensive reform and support, we can help former inmates rebuild their lives and contribute positively to society. I have seen more than I care to admit in the United States and the American criminal justice system, and now question the so called authorities in control of”law and order”.

Until Next Time…

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

The Phoenix Police Department: Abuse of Power

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

The Dark Underbelly of Phoenix: Uncovering Police Misconduct

In the sprawling metropolis of Phoenix, Arizona, a city known for its desert landscapes and vibrant culture, there lies a darker underbelly—a system marred by corruption and abuse of power. At the forefront of this injustice stands the Phoenix Police Department (PPD), an entity entrusted with upholding the law but often found guilty of violating it.

22 Arizona Police Officers Punished So Far In 2024

In a year marked by heightened scrutiny of law enforcement, Arizona’s Peace Officer Standards and Training Board (AZPOST) has taken action against misconduct within the state’s police force. With 37 investigations opened since August, including cases of officers asking suggestive questions to minors and threatening individuals with deadly force, the board has suspended or revoked certifications for 22 officers. Notable cases include Mesa officer Clinton Bertola’s inappropriate interrogation of high school girls and Gilbert Police Officer Andrew Neves’ use of excessive force. These actions underscore AZPOST’s pivotal role in holding officers accountable and safeguarding public trust in law enforcement, emphasizing the need for ongoing reform and oversight.

On a personal note, I wrote a letter to AZPOST and sent them the evidence needed of an arrest record and criminal history of Detective Marchele Miller in 2019, at present still I’ve heard nothing yet.

Arizona’s Law Enforcement Accountability: AZPOST Probes 20 More Cases of Police Misconduct in 2023

Arizona’s law enforcement watchdog, the Arizona Peace Officer Standards and Training Board (AZPOST), has intensified its scrutiny of police conduct, opening investigations into 20 new cases of misconduct since March. Allegations include excessive force, bungled investigations, and instances of domestic violence, reflecting a disturbing trend within the state’s police force. Notable cases involve a trooper ordering his police dog to bite individuals and a Tempe officer tasing an unarmed man 13 times. AZPOST’s role in holding officers accountable underscores the importance of transparency and oversight in maintaining public trust in law enforcement.

Arizona Police Misconduct: 17 Officers Under Investigation for Various Offenses in 2023

Marked by a string of troubling incidents, the Arizona Peace Officer Standards and Training Board (AZPOST) has opened investigations into 17 cases of police misconduct. Among the allegations are excessive force, DUIs, reckless driving, and instances of dishonesty. These cases shed light on internal investigations often kept from public view, ranging from a state trooper’s controversial TikTok videos to a small-town police chief’s DUI arrest. Despite heightened scrutiny, AZPOST’s decisions on disciplinary actions remain pivotal, with some high-profile use-of-force cases resulting in no further action taken.

DATABASE OF DECERTIFICATIONS OF ‘DIRTY COPS‘ FROM AZPOST:

Arizona-DecertificationsDownload

Concealed Crimes: Detective Marchele Miller’s Hidden Past

One even more outrageous example of this misconduct is the case of Detective Marchele Miller, whose own criminal history and arrest record were conveniently concealed from both the public and the defense in a court of law. This deliberate act of deception not only undermines the integrity of our justice system but also raises serious questions about the credibility of those tasked with enforcing the law. Obtaining indictments and testifying in trials, with a known criminal history and arrest record of deception and lying, this kind of officer is a clear and present danger since February 23, 2012.

DetectiveMarcheleMillerCHAR-1Download

Operating Under the ‘Color of Law’: The PPD’s Abuse of Authority

The concept of operating under the ‘color of law‘ is not unfamiliar to the PPD. It refers to the misuse of power, typically by government officials, to deprive individuals of their constitutional rights under the guise of enforcing the law. In the case of Detective Marchele Miller, her actions epitomize this abuse of authority, as she exploited her position to suppress vital information that could have potentially exonerated innocent individuals. Ironically, the federal statute requires a 5-20 year prison sentence for this kind of violation.

Phoenix’s Police Oversight Agency Struggles Amid City Interference

The Office of Accountability and Transparency (OAT) in Phoenix faced internal challenges as city officials undermined its independence, leading to the resignation of its director, Roger Smith. Despite public claims of robust oversight, documents reveal city officials’ efforts to control OAT’s operations, including blocking the hiring of an experienced attorney, Catherine Bowman. Smith’s departure highlighted ongoing tensions between city leadership and efforts for meaningful police accountability.

Phoenix Police Chief Defends Force Amidst Fatal Shooting

Amidst an orchestrated media campaign by Phoenix Police Chief Michael Sullivan defending the department against federal oversight, officers shot and killed a man, marking the second fatal police shooting in six days. The city’s pushback against a Justice Department investigation into use of force highlights ongoing tensions between law enforcement and calls for accountability. Yet, interesting that a so-called Law Enforcement Officer in leadership does not recognize the ‘supreme Law of the Land’ of the Federal Government, but believes that he and the PPD can subjugate those in the City Of Phoenix to local laws with severe pains, penalties, and punishment inducing a life of trauma and tragedy.

DOJ Launches Investigation into Phoenix Police Misconduct

The U.S. Department of Justice initiates a comprehensive probe into the Phoenix Police Department and the city of Phoenix over allegations of misconduct, including excessive force and retaliation against protesters. Attorney General Merrick Garland and Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke announced the investigation, which will scrutinize various aspects of police conduct, including use of force, discriminatory policing, and treatment of individuals experiencing homelessness. The probe follows a series of controversies, including a crackdown on protests and a high number of police shootings, raising concerns about civil rights violations and accountability within the department.

Just recently the FBI arrested a Phoenix police officer on April 5 for allegedly receiving and possessing thousands of images and videos of child pornography. Gilbert resident Alaa Robert Bartley, 41, was indicted three days later by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Arizona. He was charged with one count of receiving child pornography and one count of knowingly possessing child pornography.Bartley faces a sentence of five years to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000 on the receiving charge. The possession charges carry a maximum sentence of 10 years, or 20 years if the pornography depicts a minor who is not yet 12, as well as a fine of up to $250,000.

Pursuing Justice: Advocating for Reform

But my pursuit of justice does not end with exposing the misconduct of the PPD; it extends to holding those responsible accountable for their actions. Through my legal human rights advocacy, Premise GSE, I aim to shed light on the injustices perpetrated by the PPD and advocate for meaningful reform within the department.

Join the Fight: Standing Up Against Injustice

Transparency and accountability are the cornerstones of a fair and just society. By shining a spotlight on the actions of Detective Miller and others like her, we can begin to dismantle the culture of impunity that has long plagued the PPD. It is time to demand accountability from those sworn to protect and serve, and to ensure that justice is truly blind. As I continue to fight for my own rights and seek redress for the injustices I have endured, I invite others to join me in holding the Phoenix Police Department accountable. Together, we can strive towards a future where the law is upheld with integrity and fairness, and where no one is above the law, not even those sworn to enforce it.

Until next time,

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III