Posts Tagged :

arizona

The Brady List: Arizona’s Routine Practice Of NonDisclosure

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Title: The Brady List: Arizona’s Routine Practice Of NonDisclosure

Introduction: In our relentless pursuit of justice, it’s imperative to confront both the systemic flaws in the legal system and the accountability of those entrusted with upholding it. The Brady List serves as a stark reminder of the pervasive issue of prosecutorial misconduct, while recent legislative measures in California provide a roadmap for meaningful reform.

The Brady List (known as MCAO R15DD Report in the State of Arizona):

Rule-15-List-12-29-2023Download

Exposing Systemic Flaws: The Brady List The Brady List sheds light on the disturbing prevalence of prosecutorial misconduct in Arizona. By failing to disclose crucial evidence, state attorneys undermine the very principles of fairness and justice. My own experience in case CR-2016-113647 highlights the devastating impact of this misconduct, leaving the lives of my toddler son and I shattered in its wake. The Arizona Rules of Professional Conduct 3.8, Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor, Arizona Constitution, U.S. Constitution, Supreme Court of the United States in Brady v. Maryland, Giglio v. United States has all determined that “the law requires the prosecution to disclose evidence whether or not the defendant requests any such.” The language is very clear and prosecutors who knowingly violate the law should be punished severely.

Demanding Accountability: Following California’s Lead Inspired by California’s proactive stance, where legislation enacted since 2016 mandates felony penalties for prosecutors who conceal material evidence, Arizona must follow suit. By implementing similar laws, we can hold state attorneys accountable for their actions and ensure that justice is not just a lofty ideal but a tangible reality for all.

Imposing Consequences: Prison Time for Prosecutors Concealing material impeachment and exculpatory evidence cannot go unpunished. Arizona must enact measures to impose prison time on prosecutors found guilty of such misconduct. This sends a clear message that justice cannot be compromised and that every individual, regardless of their position, is held to the highest standards of integrity. If such lawlessness goes unchecked, the only way to address grievances will clearly be by street justice and laws of retribution.

Uniting for Change: Advocating for Reform Addressing both the systemic failures highlighted by the Brady List and the need for prosecutorial accountability requires collective action. Let us unite in advocating for change and demanding that lawmakers take decisive action to uphold justice for all. Together, we can ensure that no one is above the law and that every individual is afforded their fundamental rights.

Conclusion: As we strive for justice, let us remain steadfast in our commitment to reforming Arizona’s legal system. By exposing systemic flaws, demanding accountability, and advocating for change, we can create a future where fairness and integrity prevail. Together, we can pave the way for a legal system that truly serves the interests of justice for all.

Unveiling Judicial Bias: A Call to Action for Justice

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

Today, I want to address a critical issue plaguing our justice system: judicial bias. As someone who has experienced the injustices firsthand, I am deeply troubled by the erosion of fair trial principles in state courts across the United States. From favoritism towards the prosecution to blatant antagonism towards defendants, it’s clear that the neutrality requirement enshrined in the United States Constitution is being trampled upon.

The Prosecution’s Preferential Treatment

One of the most alarming manifestations of judicial bias is the preferential treatment given to the prosecution. In numerous cases, judges have exhibited a propensity to side with prosecutors, often at the expense of defendants’ rights. This bias can manifest in various forms, from allowing questionable evidence to be admitted to the courtroom to imposing disproportionately harsh sentences.

Antagonism Towards Defendants

Equally troubling is the antagonism displayed towards defendants. Instead of serving as impartial arbiters of the law, some judges seem to view defendants with suspicion and disdain. This predisposition can lead to rushed judgments, denial of crucial evidence, and an overall denial of the right to a fair trial.

Rooted in White Supremacy

Adding to the complexity of the issue is the deeply ingrained pattern, practice, and customs rooted in white supremacy within the judiciary. This insidious influence perpetuates systemic biases that disproportionately affect marginalized communities. State court judges, emboldened by these entrenched beliefs, often operate under the illusion of being unaccountable for their actions, even in cases of wrongful and unlawful convictions. It is an insane asylum, when the administrators of law knowingly violate the law holding others to account, but believe that they can NEVER be accountable for their own actions and inactions, costing irreparable harm to individuals’ lives.

Historical Precedents

Throughout history, there have been instances where state court judges have been arrested or convicted, casting doubt on the integrity of their judgments. These cases serve as stark reminders of the dangers of unchecked judicial power and the need for robust oversight mechanisms. Examples of such judges for factual reference are Josef Altstötter, Noel Arrigo, Mark Ciavarella, Jacques Delisle, Thomas J. Maloney, Ernst Pöhner, Oswald Rothaug are just to name a few.

The Legal Framework: 28 U.S. Code § 144

It’s crucial to recognize the legal framework designed to address judicial bias. 28 U.S. Code § 144 stipulates procedures for challenging the bias or prejudice of a judge. However, the effectiveness of these mechanisms is often hindered by institutional barriers and a reluctance to confront entrenched biases within the judiciary.

The Issue of Absolute Immunity

Moreover, the concept of “absolute immunity” further exacerbates the issue of judicial accountability. Judges are granted near-untouchable status, shielded from any repercussions for their actions, no matter how reckless or unjust. This lack of accountability undermines the very foundation of our legal system and erodes public trust in the judiciary.

A Call to Action

It’s imperative that we address these issues head-on. The integrity of our justice system depends on it. We must demand accountability from judges, advocate for reforms that promote fairness and impartiality, and hold those responsible for judicial bias to account.

Conclusion

As I continue my fight for justice, I urge you to join me in speaking out against judicial bias and standing up for the rights enshrined in the Constitution. Together, we can strive towards a legal system that upholds the principles of equality, fairness, and justice for all.

Sincerely,

Ewing Samuels

Unearthing Arizona: Tracing Roots of Government Abuse and White Supremacy

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

In the vast tapestry of American history, certain threads are woven with complexity and nuance, revealing uncomfortable truths about the past and present. One such thread leads us to the State of Arizona, a land of stunning landscapes and vibrant cultures, but also a place marked by a troubling legacy of government abuse and entrenched white supremacy.

Founding and Troubling Past: Arizona’s origins trace back to its founding after the Civil War, a period of profound upheaval and redefinition in American society. Founded in 1863, Arizona Territory emerged from the crucible of post-war reconstruction. It’s crucial to acknowledge that Arizona was established by individuals who had ties to the Confederacy, the faction that fought to preserve slavery and secede from the Union. Many of these Confederate sympathizers migrated westward after the South’s defeat, seeking new opportunities in the untamed territories beyond.

Present-Day Reflections: The echoes of Arizona’s troubled past reverberate into the present, shaping its political landscape and law enforcement practices. While progress has been made, the shadows of white supremacy still loom large, influencing policies and attitudes in subtle yet insidious ways.

Government Abuse of Power: Throughout its history, Arizona has grappled with instances of government abuse of power, disproportionately impacting marginalized communities, including Native American and Latino populations. From discriminatory laws to controversial law enforcement tactics, there’s a troubling pattern of systemic injustice that cannot be ignored.

Roots of White Supremacy: To understand Arizona’s present-day behaviors, one must confront the uncomfortable truth of its roots in white supremacy. This isn’t to say that every Arizonan subscribes to such beliefs, but rather to acknowledge the historical forces that have shaped the state’s identity and institutions.

Arrests and Convictions: Among the notable instances of government abuse, Arizona has witnessed the arrest and conviction of state authorities, including governors and law enforcement figures, J. Fife Symington III and Evan Mecham, both of whom faced legal troubles during their time in office. But, perhaps one of the most infamous cases is that of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, whose tenure was marred by accusations of racial profiling, abuse of power, and defiance of court orders. Arpaio’s actions exemplified the deep-seated issues within Arizona’s law enforcement system, underscoring the need for accountability and reform. It also highlights the vulnerability of Arizona’s political system to corruption and abuse of power.

Moving Forward: Recognizing Arizona’s troubled past is the first step toward building a more just and equitable future. It requires honest conversations, meaningful reforms, and a commitment to dismantling systems of oppression. Only by confronting the legacies of white supremacy head-on can Arizona truly fulfill its promise as a land of opportunity and equality for all. But who are we really kidding? The system is working perfectly fine, as it was designed.

In conclusion, the State of Arizona stands at a crossroads, where its history converges with its present reality. By acknowledging the uncomfortable truths of its founding and confronting the lingering specter of white supremacy, Arizona has the opportunity to forge a new path forward, one rooted in justice, equality, and respect for all its inhabitants. Or continue down the path of a State that will sooner or later find itself in the dustpan of history and its Authority figures with indictments and warrants for their arrests, no matter how old they are enjoying retirement while hundreds, possibly thousands suffer in torment at their actions and inactions while they knowingly violated Constitutional, legal and human rights.