Premise GSE

Navigating the Herd Mentality: The NEED For Critical Thinking & Logical Reasoning

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

Today I want to delve into a topic that’s been weighing heavily on my mind: the decline of critical thinking in today’s society. In an age where information bombards us from every angle, it’s more crucial than ever to sharpen our ability to think critically and reason logically. Yet, it seems that herd mentality often prevails, leading many astray like sheep to the slaughter.

Understanding Herd Mentality

What exactly do I mean by herd mentality? It’s the phenomenon where individuals tend to conform to the behaviors, beliefs, and opinions of the majority, often without questioning or analyzing them. It’s also known as the bandwagon effect. This conformity can be comforting, as it provides a sense of belonging and security. However, it can also be dangerous, as it blinds us to alternative perspectives and leaves us vulnerable to manipulation and misinformation.

The Challenge of Information Overload

In today’s hyper-connected world, we’re inundated with information from social media, news outlets, and other sources. While this abundance of information can be empowering, it also presents a challenge: how do we separate fact from fiction, truth from propaganda?

The Role of Critical Thinking

The answer lies in cultivating our critical thinking skills. Critical thinking involves actively and skillfully evaluating information, arguments, and evidence to make informed decisions. It’s about questioning assumptions, challenging beliefs, and approaching issues with an open mind.

Obstacles to Critical Thinking

Unfortunately, critical thinking seems to be in short supply these days. Instead, we’re bombarded with sensationalist headlines, echo chambers that reinforce our existing beliefs, and soundbites designed to manipulate rather than inform.

Implications in Real-Life Situations

Take, for example, my own case. In my experience, I’ve seen firsthand how the absence of critical thinking and logical reasoning can lead to serious consequences. When individuals blindly follow the herd, without questioning the validity of the information presented to them, it can result in grave injustices. Not only does this impact the individual directly involved, but it also implicates the entire system that failed to uphold principles of fairness and justice. Below is evindence of FRAUD, KIDNAPPING, and CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY committed by the State of Arizona and its legal authorities. Under universal jurisdiction and both federal and international laws, the crimes committed are subject to 20 years to life in prison. The State of Arizona cannot be taken serious when it covered up the death of Royce Emmett Walker on May 21, 2015 and the very same murder suspect Jamil Trevon Curd was given immunity to testify against me. While Detective Marchele Miller the case manager went to grave lengths to push a narrative that was based on deception. And increasing the errors a thousandfold was the deliberate violations of ommitting material facts, concealing impeachment and exculpatory evidence,perjury, subornation, and too much to list…conducted by William Montgomery, David Foster and Lori Eidemenis of the Maricopa County Attorney Office in a ‘court of law’. Then the Court itself, of George H. Foster, Jr. and the Superior Court of Maricopa County is allowed to continue intentional violations to cover up State authorities crimes, with ORDERS from the court with no real adequate investigation into the facts thereof, but to attain, maintain, and sustain convictions on technicalities rather than merits.

05312022-PPM-ProPerMailDownload

Strategies for Improvement

So, what can we do to combat this trend? First and foremost, we must become more mindful consumers of information. This means taking the time to verify sources, cross-check information, and seek out diverse perspectives. It also means being willing to admit when we’re wrong and adjust our beliefs accordingly.

The Importance of Education

Furthermore, we need to teach critical thinking skills from an early age. Education systems should prioritize teaching students how to think, not what to think. By instilling a foundation of logic, reasoning, and skepticism, we can empower the next generation to navigate the complexities of the modern world with clarity and confidence.

The Power of Independent Thought

But perhaps most importantly, we must be willing to think for ourselves. It’s easy to succumb to the pressure of the crowd, to follow the path of least resistance. But true wisdom lies in forging our own path, even if it means standing alone against the tide.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the rise of herd mentality in today’s society is a cause for concern. But it’s not too late to turn the tide. By prioritizing critical thinking and logical reasoning, we can reclaim our autonomy, challenge the status quo, and build a brighter future for generations to come.

Until next time,

I am,

Ewing Samuels

U.S. Human Rights Landscape: Insights from the 2023 GRIP Annual Report

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

In an era where the narrative of American exceptionalism often pervades, it’s imperative to scrutinize the nation’s performance on a global scale, especially concerning human rights. The recently released 2023 GRIP Annual Report, a collaborative effort between the Global Rights Project (GRIP) and the CIRIGHTS data project, offers a sobering evaluation of the United States’ commitment to human rights.

Assessing America’s Standing

The report, which evaluates 195 countries across various human rights metrics, paints a nuanced picture of America’s standing in the world. Divided into four categories—physical integrity, empowerment, worker rights, and justice rights—the assessment aims to provide a comprehensive overview of each nation’s adherence to fundamental human rights principles.

A Closer Look at Challenges

Regrettably, the findings reveal a widespread disregard for human rights globally, with 60% of countries receiving failing grades. In this landscape, the United States narrowly avoided a failing grade, scoring a 64 and ranking 59th overall. While this may seem favorable compared to some nations, it underscores significant room for improvement within America’s human rights framework.

One of the report’s focal points is the discrepancy between America’s perceived strengths in civil and political rights and its shortcomings in other areas. Specifically, issues such as torture, extrajudicial killings, and labor rights highlight areas of concern. Law enforcement’s use of interrogation techniques bordering on torture and the disproportionate use of lethal force against black Americans underscore systemic issues that demand urgent attention.

Connecting Personal Experience to the Larger Context

As we absorb these findings, it’s essential to reflect on how they resonate with individual experiences. In my case, as someone who has faced egregious and flagrant violations of fundamental rights and due process within the U.S. legal system, this report strikes a particularly poignant chord. I have endured due process violations, fraud against me, the kidnapping of my 5 year old child, state authorities engaged in perjury in courts against me, deception to paint a picture that never existed and still doesn’t exist, overt racism, poisoned while incarcerated, denial of medical care while incarcerated, assaulted by correctional officer while in Florence, Arizona, placed in a dog cage all day, deplorable living conditions, torture, witnessing law enforcement smuggle drugs and phones in prison, and witnessing multiple murders while I was in prison. And NO, I will never help any law enforcement with what I have seen.

My wrongful and unlawful conviction served as a stark reminder of the imperfections within America’s justice system. It exemplifies how individuals can become ensnared in a system that, despite its professed commitment to human rights, can perpetuate injustice and deny individuals their fundamental rights.

2016 (BEFORE) 2022 (INCARCERATED) 2023 (RELEASED) 2024 (TODAY)

A Call for Vigilance and Accountability

In light of these revelations, it becomes evident that the U.S. government cannot be trusted with more significant matters if fundamental human rights are not safeguarded at home. The need for transparency, accountability, and a steadfast commitment to upholding human rights cannot be overstated. Only through collective vigilance and concerted efforts can we hold our institutions accountable and ensure that justice prevails for all.

Finding Hope Amidst Challenges

Despite these challenges, the report offers a glimmer of optimism by positioning the United States favorably compared to other populous countries and geopolitical rivals. While not without flaws, America’s relatively stronger performance in certain human rights indicators serves as a testament to the enduring values enshrined in its founding principles. Yet the country is seeing a downward spiral with clear knowledge of violating human rights on account of race, color, sex, religion, and national origin.

Moving Forward Together

As we reflect on these findings, it’s crucial to recognize that human rights progress is not linear. The report’s insights serve as a call to action for policymakers, activists, and citizens alike to redouble their efforts in upholding and advancing human rights both domestically and globally.

In closing, let us heed the words of Skip Mark, director of the Center for Nonviolence and Peace Studies, who aptly remarked, “There’s a lot of work to do in terms of ensuring that all people have a chance to live a life of dignity and respect.” Together, let us strive to build a world where human rights are not just an aspiration but a lived reality for all.

I am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

The Hidden Truth: When Love Conceals a Sordid Past

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Unveiling Deception: A Betrayal of Trust

In matters of the heart, we often find ourselves entranced by the allure of love, drawn to another soul in a way that feels almost inevitable. We open our hearts, share our vulnerabilities, and believe in the promise of a future intertwined with our beloved. However, what happens when that future is built upon a foundation of secrets and unspoken truths?

The Shattering Revelation: A Personal Journey

In my own experience, I found myself entangled in a relationship where the surface appeared pristine, but beneath lay a web of deception. My romantic partner, whom I trusted implicitly, failed to disclose a past marred by a criminal history and an arrest record. It was a revelation that shattered the illusions I had constructed, leaving me reeling with disbelief and a profound sense of betrayal. Theft, criminal damage, domestic violence, alcoholism, interference with judicial proceedings, aggravated assault was all overwhelming as I learned of this information 2 years after my incarceration, while in prison. Nowhere in our 4 year relationship did this Jezebel mentioned any of this, yet she was 10 years older than I. Maybe I was naive?

Prior to meeting these two individuals, I have never had any criminal history nor arrest record.

“When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time.” – MayaAngelou

CRIMINAL HISTORY AND ARREST RECORD OF ALISA MICHELLE HUDSON:

09:22:2022-PPM-ProPerMail2Download

Hidden Histories: The Impact Beyond Ourselves

But perhaps even more distressing was the discovery that my partner’s 24 year old son, Jamil Trevon Curd, shared a similar, if not more troubling, history. His own journey was fraught with challenges and poor choices, yet this crucial information remained concealed, casting a shadow of doubt over the authenticity of our relationship. It is even more disturbing that his own mother wanted to press charges on him for criminal conduct in her home.

CRIMINAL HISTORY AND ARREST RECORD OF JAMIL TREVON CURD:

05092022-PPM-ProPerMail4Download

The Ripple Effect: Community Perception and Self-Reflection

The ramifications of such revelations are far-reaching and deeply impactful. Trust, once broken, is not easily repaired. It erodes the very foundation upon which love is built, leaving behind a sense of insecurity and doubt that lingers long after the truth has been revealed. Moreover, the repercussions extend beyond the confines of our personal lives, affecting those around us in ways we may not fully comprehend. In my case, the implications of my partner’s hidden past reverberated through my community, tarnishing reputations and eliciting judgment from those who had once held us in high esteem.

Embracing Truth: A Journey of Resilience

But amidst the turmoil and heartache, there lies an opportunity for growth and introspection. It is a chance to reassess our priorities, redefine our boundaries, and reclaim our sense of agency in navigating the complexities of love and relationships. For me, this journey has been one of self-discovery and resilience. I refuse to be defined by the actions of others or constrained by the limitations of my past. Instead, I choose to embrace the truth, however painful it may be, and forge ahead with a renewed sense of purpose and determination.

Moving Forward: Honoring Authenticity

To those who find themselves grappling with similar circumstances, I offer this advice: Trust your instincts, honor your worth, and never compromise your integrity for the sake of love. True happiness lies in authenticity, transparency, and the unwavering commitment to living a life guided by truth and integrity.

Conclusion: Embracing Love’s Light

In closing, let us remember that love, though fragile, possesses the power to heal and transform even the most broken of hearts. But it is only when we confront the shadows of our past that we can truly embrace the light of a brighter tomorrow.

Defamation, Libel, and Slander: Unveiling the Truth Behind Injustice

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Exposing the Deception: The Impact of Selective Publications

Today, I want to delve into a topic that strikes at the core of justice and integrity: defamation, libel, and slander. As a victim of these injustices myself, I stand firm in shedding light on how state authorities can misuse their power to tarnish reputations and undermine credibility. Yet it must be understood that these very same state authorities deliberately, knowingly, and intentionally engage in routine active fraudulent concealment and the omission of material facts, denying due process, not some of the time, but ALL OF THE TIME!

Unveiling the Truth: A Closer Look at Incomplete Narratives

In my case, I have faced a barrage of challenges stemming from a wrongful and unlawful conviction in the State of Arizona. Despite being released after 6.5 years of incarceration, the ordeal did not end there. Upon my return to Belize, I discovered a web of publications scattered across various websites, each presenting fragments of the case without the full truth. These publications were not only misleading but also intentionally crafted to harm my reputation and credibility.

Standing Against Injustice: The Power of Accountability

The dissemination of incomplete and biased information has profound consequences. It not only erodes trust but also perpetuates misconceptions and prejudices. As someone deeply committed to upholding truth and justice, I refuse to let these falsehoods stand unchallenged.

Shedding Light on the Facts: Holding the Responsible Accountable

Let’s address the facts:

  1. Wrongful Conviction: On February 2, 2017, I was convicted under circumstances marred by injustice. Despite evidence pointing to my innocence, the legal system failed to deliver a fair trial.
  2. Incomplete Publications: Multiple websites have hosted documents related to my case, yet they only present partial information. This selective sharing not only distorts the narrative but also serves to defame my character.
  3. Damage to Reputation: The repercussions of these publications extend far beyond personal grievances. They impede my ability to rebuild my life and pursue justice for the injustices I’ve endured.

Advocating for Truth and Justice: A Call to Action

It’s crucial to hold accountable those responsible for perpetuating these falsehoods. By exposing the truth and demanding accountability, we pave the way for a more just and equitable society.

Utilizing Technology for Justice: Skyview A.I.’s Groundbreaking Contribution

In this pursuit of truth, my company, Skyview A.I. GSE, has developed a groundbreaking artificial intelligence application called Oversight. Oversight aids in uncovering blatant disregard of facts, assisting prosecuting attorneys in charging those ‘cloaked under color of law’ with crimes and human rights violations under universal jurisdiction. This innovative technology is a beacon of hope for those seeking accountability and justice in the face of systemic injustices.

The Below is a Preview of the Listing of Dirty and Corrupt Cops in Oversight:

Arizona-DecertificationsDownload

Seeking Justice: Taking a Stand Against Injustice

Here are some of the websites hosting documents pertaining to my case:

  1. Website 1: https://casetext.com/case/state-v-samuels-72
  2. Website 2: https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-one-unpublished/2018/1-ca-cr-17-0225.html
  3. Website 3: https://casetext.com/case/state-v-samuels-122014
  4. Website 4: https://www.leagle.com/decision/inazco20180816003
  5. Website 5: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/20-71137/20-71137-2021-02-19.html
  6. Website 6: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-9th-circuit/2112631.html

While these publications may attempt to distort reality, I remain steadfast in my pursuit of truth and justice. With irrefutable evidence and unwavering determination, I am confident that justice will prevail. It is clear that the “authorities’ listed in these cases are armed with the power of a government with unlimited resources, and most people with this kind of power commit atrocties under the cloak, guise and color of law.

One must remember that even Adolf Hitler and the Nazis in power in Germany in the 1940s were arresting, detaining, imprisoning, deporting and executing individuals under the “color of law“. It was all deemed Legal. at that time. It is also very disturbing that some of these JEWISH descendants (prosecutors, judges, attorneys) in the courts are committing the very same atrocities against black and brown people with the power of their offices in the United States of America, that they constantly claim occurred to their own grandparents in Nazi Germany in the Holocaust. They know what racism is. They know what white supremacy is. They know exactly what they are doing!

Together We Stand: Uniting Against Falsehoods

In closing, I urge you to remain vigilant against misinformation and to stand with me in the fight against defamation, libel, and slander. Together, we can strive for a world where truth triumphs over falsehoods and justice prevails for all.

Thank you for your unwavering support,

Ewing Samuels

Understanding Mental Illness in the U.S.: A Vital Conversation

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

What is mental health?

Mental health encompasses our emotional, psychological, and social well-being, influencing how we think, feel, and act. It’s integral to handling stress, relating to others, and making healthy choices. From childhood through adulthood, mental health plays a crucial role at every stage of life.

Why is mental health important for overall health?

In the realm of health, mental and physical well-being are equally vital. Consider this: depression can heighten the risk of enduring physical health issues, including diabetes, heart disease, and stroke. Conversely, chronic conditions can escalate the likelihood of mental health challenges. The synergy between mental and physical health underscores the necessity of addressing both aspects comprehensively.

Can your mental health change over time?

Absolutely. Mental health isn’t static; it fluctuates over time due to various factors. When the demands imposed on an individual surpass their coping abilities and resources, mental health may suffer. Long work hours, caregiving responsibilities, or financial strain are examples of circumstances that can strain mental health.

How common are mental illnesses?

Mental illnesses are prevalent in the United States:

  • More than one in five U.S. adults grapple with a mental illness.
  • Over one in five adolescents, aged 13-18, either currently or previously, have experienced a debilitating mental illness.
  • Approximately one in twenty-five adults in the U.S. contends with a severe mental illness such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depression.

What causes mental illness?

The roots of mental illness are multifaceted:

  • Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs), like trauma or abuse, can heighten the risk.
  • Ongoing medical conditions, such as traumatic brain injury, cancer, or diabetes, may contribute.
  • Biological factors or chemical imbalances in the brain can play a role.
  • Substance abuse, feelings of loneliness, or social isolation can exacerbate mental health challenges.

Understanding mental illness necessitates recognizing its diverse causes and manifestations. It underscores the importance of fostering awareness, destigmatizing conversations, and promoting access to comprehensive mental health care for all individuals. Together, we can create a supportive environment where mental health is prioritized and every individual receives the care and support they deserve.

Regards,

Ewing Samuels

User

Shedding Light on the Dark Realities of the Foster Care System

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

In our society, the foster care system stands as a pillar of protection for children facing abuse and neglect. Yet, beneath its noble facade lies a troubling truth: many of these vulnerable children, taken from their homes in the name of safety, are thrust into environments where they face an increased risk of sexual abuse and exploitation.

Facts

In 2019 there were an estimated 400,000 children in foster care. Of those children, it is estimated that up to 40% of them had experienced some type of abuse within the system. In the United States it is estimated there are 57,329 child victims of sexual abuse each year. One 2019 foster care report noted that out of 423,997 children in the foster care system, over 46% were in nonrelative placements. Black children experienced more maltreatment than White children in multiple categories and were also noted to have higher rates of predictors of maltreatment by the NCIS software. In 2019, 23% of children in foster care were Black, 21% were Hispanic, and 8% considered multiracial, with 44% of children in foster care identifying as white. Foster care was formally established by the federal government in the Social Security Act of 1935. Up to 90% of sexually abused teens admitted to instigating violent behavior. Preferred Citation: Abigail Hessing. “Sexual Abuse of Children in the United States Foster Care System” Ballard Brief. February 2022. www.ballardbrief.org.

The Pervasive Nature of Sexual Abuse

Studies conducted across different regions unveil shocking figures. In Maryland, research from John Hopkins University indicates that children in foster care are four times more likely to experience sexual abuse than their peers outside the system, with those in group homes facing an alarming 28-fold increase in risk. Similarly, findings from Oregon and Washington state reveal that nearly one-third of foster children report abuse by a foster parent or another adult in the home. Even investigations in New Jersey foster homes cast doubt on the safety of these environments, with researchers concluding that no assurances can be given regarding the well-being of foster children.

The Connection to Child Sex Trafficking

Perhaps most distressing is the connection between foster care and child sex trafficking. More than half of the minors rescued from trafficking operations in 2013 were from foster care or group homes, highlighting a systemic failure to protect these vulnerable individuals from exploitation.

Racial Disparities

Moreover, racial disparities further exacerbate the injustices within the system. African American children are disproportionately represented in foster care, comprising over one-third of the population despite accounting for only 15% of all children. Women of color are more likely to be reported for child abuse and neglect, leading to a higher likelihood of having their children removed from their care.

Defining Neglect

In many cases, the definition of neglect itself perpetuates systemic injustice. Factors such as homelessness or financial instability are often used as grounds for removal, further entrenching racial and socioeconomic disparities.

The Need for Reform

The foster care system, like any institution, must be held accountable for its failures. Stricter screening of caregivers, robust protocols for investigating abuse claims, and increased prosecution of perpetrators are crucial steps toward ensuring the safety and well-being of foster children. Prosecutions and arrests must include the child care operatives themselves. On a personal note, in my case and while I was in jail and prison, most prisoners I found had a background from being in the foster care system that included abuse, while in the system, which eventually led to drug and alcohol abuse, and crime. The State authorities are ultimately culpable and are to be held accountable under international laws and universal jurisdiction.

Conclusion

As we strive to build a society where every child can thrive, we must confront the uncomfortable truths lurking within our child welfare system. Only then can we truly fulfill our obligation to protect the most vulnerable among us and provide them with the nurturing, supportive childhood they deserve.

Respectfully,

Ewing Samuels

Incompetence, Ineptitude And Injustice in Arizona Government

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Unearthing the Issue

In April 2024, the State of Arizona found itself confronting a critical flaw within its Department of Child Safety (DCS) system. The discovery revealed a troubling reality: judges were rendering decisions regarding child removals without access to crucial information.

Attorney General’s Call to Action

Prompted by this revelation, Attorney General Kris Mayes initiated a review of more than 650 closed cases. The aim? To determine whether undisclosed documents could have influenced the outcomes. The stakes were high, with the potential for overturned decisions concerning parental rights, guardianships, or adoptions.

Assessing the Impact

Assistant Attorney General Kirsten Wright sent letters to presiding judges in all 15 counties, urging them to suspend action on pending cases related to child placement. Initial assessments suggested that a staggering 3,800 juvenile dependency cases statewide may be affected. The magnitude of the situation demanded a comprehensive approach.

A Case-by-Case Evaluation

With thousands of cases under scrutiny, a meticulous examination was underway. Each case would be evaluated individually to determine the significance of any undisclosed documents. The goal? To ascertain whether errors in disclosure warranted reopening cases and potentially reversing prior decisions.

Accountability and Responsibility

As investigations unfolded, blame for the systemic issue was directed at the previous administration. Governor Katie Hobbs and DCS Director David Lujan held former Governor Doug Ducey and his DCS appointee, Michael Faust, accountable for the flawed system. The failure to ensure proper document disclosure was deemed unacceptable.

Doug Ducey
Michael Faust
Mark Brnovich

Arizona Revised Statute (ARS) Title 13, Criminal Code § 13-105 defines criminal negligence as when someone fails to recognize a substantial and unjustifiable risk that a result will occur or a circumstance exists. The risk must be of such a nature and degree that the failure to perceive it constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would observe in the situation.

The State law itself indicates and implicates Former Governor Doug Ducey, Former Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich and Michael Faust is in violation of Arizona Revised Statute (ARS) Title 13, Criminal Code § 13-105. In a state that likes to jump the gun and charge people with a crime, it is a wonder how many people have to suffer at these criminogenic dirtbags in thirst for power.

Technical Challenges and Remedial Measures

The problem stemmed from a system implemented in 2021 by DCS to track all documents. Known as Guardian, it was billed as a replacement for CHILDS, the Children’s Information Library and Data Source, in place since 1997. Despite its promise, Guardian faced its own set of challenges, including delays in payments to foster parents and the recent revelation of undisclosed documents.

Behind the scenes, efforts were made to address the technical intricacies of the flawed system. Lujan shed light on the complexities, highlighting the challenges in ensuring the accurate filing of reports from external service providers. Despite recent fixes, concerns lingered about the system’s efficacy.

Conclusion: Upholding Accountability and Safeguarding Children

In conclusion, the recent developments underscored the ongoing commitment of Arizona officials to safeguarding the welfare of children. Despite facing significant challenges, steps were being taken to strengthen oversight and uphold accountability. As the state forged ahead, ensuring the integrity of the child protection system remained paramount. There are clear facts and inicators that the State of Arizona have more than most likely damaged the welfare of thousands of children and violated families since 1997. This calls for a serious Federal and International investigation of kidnapping and child abductions through State Government.

Thank you for your continued support and engagement as we navigate these critical issues together.

Warm regards,

Ewing Samuels

Unmasking the Charade: The Illusion of Reform in Arizona’s Child Welfare

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction: A Cloak of Deception

Arizona’s child welfare system stands exposed, its flaws laid bare for all to see. Governor Jan Brewer’s ostensible initiative to overhaul the system rings hollow in the face of entrenched failures and bureaucratic malaise. As the state convenes a special legislative session, the façade of reform belies a deeper truth: the perpetuation of a broken system under a different guise. This article dismantles the illusion of change, exposing the true motives behind Arizona’s so-called child welfare reforms.

The Theatre of Reform: Smoke and Mirrors

Behind the grandiose rhetoric of reform lies a stark reality: the Arizona Department of Child Safety (AZDCS) is little more than a rebranded version of its failed predecessor. Governor Brewer’s purported commitment to child safety rings hollow in light of the systemic failures that have plagued the state’s child welfare apparatus for decades. As the state embarks on yet another round of bureaucratic reshuffling, the fundamental issues remain unaddressed, relegated to the shadows by a superficial veneer of change.

A System Betrayed: The Legacy of Neglect

The legacy of “neglect” and mismanagement within Arizona’s child welfare system is undeniable. From the staggering backlog of 6,600 uninvestigated cases to the systemic failures that have endangered countless children, the state’s track record speaks for itself. Governor Brewer’s attempt to rebrand the agency as a beacon of child safety is a cruel irony, a slap in the face to the countless families who have suffered at the hands of a broken system.

The Truth Unveiled: Exposing the Agenda

Amidst the spectacle of reform, the true agenda behind Governor Brewer’s initiative comes into focus. By perpetuating the illusion of change, the state seeks to deflect attention from its own failures and evade accountability for the systemic injustices that continue to plague Arizona’s most vulnerable children. Behind the façade of reform lies a more insidious truth: the preservation of a status quo that serves the interests of the powerful at the expense of the powerless.

Complicity Unveiled: The Role of the Attorney General

Within the intricate web of Arizona’s bureaucratic apparatus, the Attorney General’s Office emerges as a formidable guardian of the Arizona Department of Child Safety (AZDCS). Tasked ostensibly with upholding justice, this office often assumes the role of protector, shielding AZDCS from scrutiny and shielding its agents from accountability.

Defending the Indefensible: Protecting AZDCS at All Costs

When individuals like myself challenge the actions of AZDCS, the Attorney General’s Office becomes their staunch defender. Employing tactics of intimidation, threats, deception and obfuscation, they seek to safeguard AZDCS from the consequences of its actions. Through acts of perjury and slander, they silence dissent and perpetuate the illusion of infallibility surrounding AZDCS.The Arizona Attorney General’s Office is complicit in numerous crimes and crimes against children with knowledge and evidence within its posession. The Department of Justice needs to investigate this agency. There are clear crimes and human rights violations that can be taken up in the international courts.

An Active Participant in Injustice

In their zealous defense of AZDCS, the Attorney General’s Office becomes complicit in the systemic injustices that plague Arizona’s child welfare system. By prioritizing the preservation of power over the pursuit of truth and justice, they betray the very principles they are sworn to uphold. Victims are left to navigate a landscape of deceit and betrayal, denied the justice they rightfully deserve.

Conclusion: A Call to Action

As Arizona embarks on yet another round of bureaucratic reshuffling, it is imperative that we see through the illusion of reform and demand real accountability for the systemic failures that have endangered countless children. Governor Brewer’s attempt to rebrand the Arizona Department of Child Safety is a cynical ploy, designed to placate public outrage while perpetuating the very system that has failed so many. It is time to unmask the charade of reform and demand real change for Arizona’s children.

Truthfully,

Ewing Samuels

The Harrowing Reality of Kidnapping: A Personal Account of Injustice in Arizona

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction:

Kidnapping is a crime that strikes fear into the hearts of families worldwide. It’s a violation of the most fundamental human rights, tearing loved ones apart and leaving lasting scars. However, what happens when the perpetrators wear badges and operate under the guise of law enforcement? This is the chilling reality that I faced when my son was taken from me by authorities in the State of Arizona.

The Facts of Kidnapping:

Kidnapping, as defined by both state and federal statutes, involves the unlawful transportation, restraint, or confinement of an individual against their will. It’s a grave offense that carries severe penalties, rightfully so given its impact on victims and their families.

State and federal laws provide clear guidelines on what constitutes kidnapping and outline the consequences for those found guilty. These laws are meant to protect individuals from such heinous acts and ensure justice is served.

18 U.S. Code § 1201 – Kidnapping

(a) Whoever unlawfully seizes, confines, inveigles, decoys, kidnaps, abducts, or carries away and holds for ransom or reward or otherwise any person, except in the case of a minor by the parent thereof, when—

(2) any such act against the person is done within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States;

(c) If two or more persons conspire to violate this section and one or more of such persons do any overt act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life.

The Arizona Incident:

On March 21, 2016, I experienced every parent’s worst nightmare when my 5-year-old son was taken from me by authorities in Arizona. Despite having evidence to the contrary, including proof of proper care and guardianship, my son was unjustly deemed to be in “neglectful” conditions.

Detective Marchele Miller, Detective Christopher Gitsch, Officer Todd Stevens, and Sergeant Heather Howell Maldonado, and the City of Phoenix Police Department, along with individuals from the Arizona Department of Child Safety, conspired to fabricate evidence and unlawfully separate a father from his child. Their actions were not only morally reprehensible but also constituted a blatant violation of my rights as a parent. I have even more substantive documents on the Arizona Department of Child Safety as this State agency, the year prior, was directly involved and responsible for the rape and molestation of over 500 children within state custody and tried to cover up these crimes by threatening anyone of reporting this to the media. The proof of the State changing the name from CPS to DCS indicates and implicates serious wrongdoing and cover-up.

The Cover-Up:

What makes this case even more disturbing is the blatant cover-up orchestrated by those involved. Instead of upholding the law and protecting the innocent, law enforcement officers and child safety officials chose to manipulate documents, fabricate evidence, and conspire against my legal rights.

The irrefutable evidence I possess exposes the extent of their wrongdoing, highlighting a systemic failure within the justice system to hold those in positions of power accountable for their actions. I filed the Motion For Judicial Notice, pursuant to Arizona Rules of Evidence 201, as indicated below, yet NO judge at the Superior Court of Maricopa County has answered this, even though their own state court rules and Arizona Constitution indicate the Court must answer motions in 30 days. It’s 2 years now. The record is the proof.

Seeking Justice:

In the face of such injustice, I am determined to assert my legal, constitutional, and human rights. Armed with undeniable proof of the malicious intent behind my son’s abduction, I am fighting tirelessly to bring those responsible to justice and reunite with my child.

Convention on the Rights of the Child: (United Nations)

SPECIAL NOTE: The United States has not ratified the CRC despite its active role in drafting the treaty.

Article 9

1. States Parties shall ensure that a child shall not be separated from his or her parents against their will, except when competent authorities subject to judicial review determine, in accordance with applicable law and procedures, that such separation is necessary for the best interests of the child. 

Conclusion:

My story serves as a sobering reminder of the dark realities of kidnapping, particularly when perpetrated by those entrusted with upholding the law. It underscores the importance of holding individuals and institutions accountable for their actions and fighting for justice in the face of adversity.

As I continue my quest for truth and justice, stand in solidarity with me, hoping for a resolution that brings healing and closure to my family. It’s imperative that we shine a light on cases like his, ensuring that the voices of victims are heard and that the perpetrators of such egregious crimes are held accountable. I will not rest until.

Regards,

Ewing Samuels

The Paradox of Immunity: Legal Safeguards for Government Officials

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

In a world where the principle of “no one is above the law” stands as a fundamental tenet of justice, the concept of immunity for government officials presents a paradox. While the law ostensibly applies equally to all, certain individuals within the government are shielded by legal doctrines that afford them protection from prosecution or civil suits, even in the face of compelling evidence of wrongdoing. Let’s delve into the intricate landscape of immunity, particularly in the United States, and explore its implications on accountability and justice.

Understanding Immunity:

Immunity, in the context of government officials, comes in various forms, each tailored to specific roles within the judicial system. Among the most notable are qualified immunity for police officers and absolute immunity for prosecutors and judges.

  • Qualified Immunity: This doctrine shields law enforcement officers from civil liability for actions performed in the line of duty, unless their conduct violates clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. Essentially, it provides a buffer against frivolous lawsuits but has often been criticized for shielding officers from accountability, even in cases of egregious misconduct.
  • Absolute Immunity: Unlike qualified immunity, which is a defense against civil suits, absolute immunity offers broader protection, typically extended to prosecutors and judges. It grants them immunity from civil liability for actions performed within the scope of their official duties, safeguarding them from being sued for damages arising from their prosecutorial or judicial functions.

Implications of Immunity:

While immunity serves to protect government officials from the burden of constant litigation and personal liability, it can also create a perception of impunity. When individuals entrusted with upholding the law are shielded from accountability, it undermines public trust in the justice system and fosters a sense of injustice among those who feel wronged by official misconduct.

Examples of Retribution:

Instances abound where individuals, disillusioned by the perceived impunity of government officials, have taken matters into their own hands in pursuit of retribution. Take, for example, cases where victims of police brutality, denied recourse through legal channels due to qualified immunity, resort to public protests or even retaliatory violence as a means of seeking justice.

Similarly, in the realm of prosecutorial misconduct, where absolute immunity often protects prosecutors from civil liability, instances of wrongful convictions or egregious abuses of power have led to public outrage and, in some cases, vigilantism against those perceived to have evaded accountability.

Seeking Reform:

The issue of immunity for government officials is a complex one, balancing the need to protect individuals performing essential public functions with the imperative of holding them accountable for misconduct. While immunity doctrines are deeply ingrained in legal tradition, they are not immutable.

Calls for reform have echoed across the legal landscape, advocating for greater transparency, accountability, and oversight mechanisms to ensure that immunity does not serve as a shield for abuse of power or erosion of public trust. Initiatives such as the introduction of body cameras for law enforcement officers, increased prosecutorial oversight, and legislative efforts to curb the scope of immunity are steps toward a more equitable and just system. Enter Skyview A.I. GSE.: Every government official will be held accountable.

Conclusion:

In navigating the terrain of immunity for government officials, we confront a delicate balance between safeguarding the integrity of public service and upholding the principles of accountability and justice. While immunity may offer necessary protections in the performance of official duties, its unchecked application risks perpetuating a culture of impunity and injustice.

As we continue to grapple with the complexities of immunity in governance, it behooves us to remain vigilant in our pursuit of a legal framework that upholds the rule of law, ensures accountability for misconduct, and restores public faith in the institutions entrusted with administering justice. Only through thoughtful reflection, dialogue, and reform can we aspire to realize the ideal of a society where no one is truly above the law.