Premise GSE

Government Double Standards 2

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

In today’s society, the actions of governments and those of ordinary individuals are often judged by vastly different standards, despite sometimes being fundamentally similar. Governments possess the unique ability to redefine behaviors that would otherwise be considered criminal if committed by private citizens, using specific laws and statutes to justify their actions. This blog explores numerous examples that illustrate these double standards:

Government Surveillance vs. Unauthorized Surveillance

When Government Does It, it is called government surveillance, authorized under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978, particularly Section 702. When anybody else does it, it’s unauthorized surveillance, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 2511 – Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited.

Military Detention vs. Unlawful Detention

When Government Does It, it is called military detention, authorized under the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) of 2001. When anybody else does it, it’s unlawful detention, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law.

Forced Vaccination vs. Assault

When Government Does It, it is called forced vaccination, under laws such as 42 U.S. Code § 264 – Regulations to control communicable diseases. When anybody else does it, it’s assault, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 113 – Assaults within maritime and territorial jurisdiction.

Civil Commitment vs. False Imprisonment

When Government Does It, it is called civil commitment, under laws like 42 U.S. Code § 10802 – Protection and advocacy of mentally ill individuals. When anybody else does it, it’s false imprisonment, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 1201 – Kidnapping.

Government Propaganda vs. Fraud

When Government Does It, it is called government propaganda, under laws such as the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948. When anybody else does it, it’s fraud, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 1341 – Frauds and swindles.

Border Control vs. Human Trafficking

When Government Does It, it is called border control, under laws like the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). When anybody else does it, it’s human trafficking, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 1589 – Forced labor.

Government Sanctions vs. Economic Coercion

When Government Does It, it is called government sanctions, authorized under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). When anybody else does it, it’s economic coercion, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 1951 – Interference with commerce by threats or violence.

Asset Seizure vs. Burglary

When Government Does It, it is called asset seizure, under laws like 21 U.S. Code § 881 – Forfeitures. When anybody else does it, it’s burglary, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 2113 – Bank robbery and incidental crimes.

National Defense vs. Armed Assault

When Government Does It, it is called national defense, under laws like 10 U.S. Code § 5063 – Marine Corps: composition and functions. When anybody else does it, it’s armed assault, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 111 – Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees.

Government Immunity vs. Evading Prosecution

When Government Does It, it is called government immunity, under laws like the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S. Code § 2671). When anybody else does it, it’s evading prosecution, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 1073 – Flight to avoid prosecution or giving testimony.

Conclusion

These examples highlight the profound power imbalance and the different legal justifications that governments employ, which often criminalize similar behaviors by individuals. This disparity underscores the need for continued scrutiny and accountability in the actions of those in power.

Until Next Time…

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

Government Double StandardS 1

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

In our world today, the lines between right and wrong can often seem blurred, particularly when it comes to the actions of those in power. Governments have a unique ability to redefine behaviors that would otherwise be considered criminal if committed by ordinary citizens. Let’s explore some striking examples of this double standard.

Patriot Act Surveillance vs. Felony Wiretapping

When Government Does It, it is called surveillance under the USA PATRIOT Act, particularly Title II (Enhanced Surveillance Procedures). When anybody else does it, it’s felony wiretapping, breaking laws like 18 U.S. Code § 2511 – Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited.

Enhanced Interrogation vs. Torture

When Government Does It, it is called enhanced interrogation, authorized under the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005. When anybody else does it, it’s torture, violating 18 U.S. Code § 2340A – Torture.

No Knock Raids vs. Breaking and Entering

When Government Does It, it is called no-knock raids, allowed under the USA PATRIOT Act, Section 213 – Authority for delaying notice of the execution of a warrant. When anybody else does it, it’s breaking and entering, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 2113 – Bank robbery and incidental crimes.

Taxation vs. Armed Robbery

When Government Does It, it is called taxation, governed by laws like the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S. Code). When anybody else does it, it’s armed robbery, breaking laws such as 18 U.S. Code § 2113 – Bank robbery and incidental crimes.

Arrest vs. Kidnapping

When Government Does It, it is called arrest, under laws like 18 U.S. Code § 3052 – Powers of Federal Bureau of Investigation. When anybody else does it, it’s kidnapping, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 1201 – Kidnapping.

Indefinite Detention vs. Hostage Taking

When Government Does It, it is called indefinite detention, authorized under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2012, Section 1021. When anybody else does it, it’s hostage-taking, violating 18 U.S. Code § 1203 – Hostage taking.

Eminent Domain vs. Property Theft

When Government Does It, it is called eminent domain, authorized by the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and laws like the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. When anybody else does it, it’s property theft, breaking laws such as 18 U.S. Code § 641 – Public money, property or records.

Conscription vs. Forced Labor

When Government Does It, it is called conscription, authorized by the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S. Code § 3801). When anybody else does it, it’s forced labor, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 1589 – Forced labor.

NSA Data Collection vs. Cyberstalking

When Government Does It, it is called data collection under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978, particularly Section 702. When anybody else does it, it’s cyberstalking, violating laws like 18 U.S. Code § 2261A – Stalking.

Conclusion

These examples illustrate how government actions, justified by specific laws and statutes, often mirror actions that would be criminal if performed by private individuals. This discrepancy highlights the complex relationship between legality, morality, and power. The U.S. government continues to perpetrate violations of fundamental freedoms and human rights abuses under the guise of legality. It is evident that it wields its sovereignty to hold individuals accountable while shielding itself and its agents from any accountability.

Until Next Time…

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

The Reality of Legal Representation in the U.S.A.

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

“Racism and classism are a manifestation of a culture that has no genuine morals and can only elevate itself by subjugating others.”

Shahid K. Bolsen

Introduction

The United States prides itself on being a nation of laws, where justice is a fundamental pillar of society. However, for millions of people, this ideal is far from reality. With over 2.5 million individuals incarcerated in state and federal prisons, the American criminal justice system seems to be more of an industry of profit rather than a beacon of justice. This situation begs the question: Are lawyers truly fighting for the legal and constitutional rights of their clients, or is their advocacy driven primarily by personal gain?

The Role of Lawyers: Ideals vs. Reality

Lawyers are often seen as the defenders of justice, the ones who stand up for the oppressed and ensure that everyone receives a fair trial. This is the idealistic view that many people hold, inspired by courtroom dramas and the noble image of legal warriors. However, the reality is more complex and, often, disheartening.

In practice, many lawyers are motivated by financial incentives rather than a pure dedication to justice. This is not to say that all lawyers are indifferent to their clients’ rights, but the system itself encourages a focus on profit. Legal fees, billable hours, and the potential for lucrative settlements can sometimes overshadow the fundamental mission of defending constitutional rights. The prison population is also a direct reflection of what lawyers in the United States is doing and not doing.

The Profit-Driven Justice System

The staggering number of incarcerated individuals in the United States highlights a systemic issue. The criminal justice system, including its legal representatives, often operates as a business. From private prisons that benefit from high incarceration rates to legal professionals who may prioritize high-paying cases, the focus can shift from justice to profitability.

The situation becomes even more dire when considering public defenders. These lawyers, who are supposed to represent those who cannot afford private counsel, are often overworked and underpaid. With excessive caseloads and limited resources, public defenders may struggle to provide the vigorous defense that every defendant deserves. This imbalance leads to a higher likelihood of plea deals and wrongful convictions, contributing to the swelling prison population.

Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics

Personal Experience: A Case Study in Systemic Failure

My own experience underscores the flaws in the system. Wrongfully convicted and imprisoned, I encountered a legal landscape where my constitutional rights were outright overlooked. My case was not unique; countless others face similar injustices, trapped in a system that seems more concerned with maintaining its own mechanisms than ensuring fair treatment for all. My case also gives indisputable proof that the State wins cases on technicalities and not merits, with the system itself engaged in concerted actions to protect itself, completely denying you justice.

Throughout my ordeal, it became evident that many lawyers are selective in their battles, often influenced by the potential for personal gain. This selective advocacy means that those without substantial financial resources or high-profile cases may receive subpar representation, perpetuating cycles of injustice and incarceration.

“The American Criminal Justice system has a well-known history of ignoring facts and relying on prejudice.”

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

10 Eye-Opening Facts About Criminal Justice

1) Mass Incarceration: There are currently over 2 million people incarcerated in the U.S., and an additional 5 million under correctional supervision (on probation or parole).

2) Race: People of color are disproportionately represented in the criminal justice system. Applying 1996 incarceration rates, the lifetime chances of spending time behind bars is 1 in 4 for African-American males; 1 in 6 for Latino males; and 1 in 23 for white males.

3) Poverty: The majority of people in prison are poor-60% of women and 40% of men in U.S. State prisons were unemployed before their arrest. 

4) Gender: The rates of incarceration for women in New York State increased by about 500% between 1974 and 2004 (more than double the rate of increase for men). The lifetime chances of going to prison are six times as high for African-American women as for white women. 

5) Drugs: A 1997 survey of State prison inmates revealed that a third committed their offense while under the influence of drugs.

6) Families: Most people who are incarcerated are parents–75% of incarcerated women are mothers; 66% of incarcerated men are fathers. Ten million children in the U.S. have a parent who is currently or was recently under some form of criminal justice supervision (incarcerated, or on probation, or parole).

7) Youth & Juvenile Justice: In 2003, 112,000 young people were in juvenile institutions nationwide, mostly for property offenses.

8) Displaced Resources: The U.S. Census counts prisoners as part of a prison county’s population–rather than as residents of the communities they originated from. Federal resources and political representation are granted based on population, so this practice displaces needed resources and political representation away from already struggling communities to the mostly rural areas that “house” prisoners. 

9) Profits: Contracts for other services-such as security technology, vending machines, and products sold at elevated prices at the “commissary,” where prisoners buy toiletries, food, and other necessities-also generate profits.

10) Voter Disenfranchisement: In most states, those convicted of felony crimes are barred from voting for a period of time after their release; in some States, they are banned for life. 

Source: Barry Chaffkin & Tanya Krupat , Coalition 2007 Conference Presentation

A Call for Change

The American criminal justice system needs a profound transformation. Lawyers should be advocates for justice, not merely participants in a profit-driven industry. This shift requires systemic changes, including better funding and support for public defenders, reforms in sentencing laws, and a reevaluation of the incentives that drive legal practice.

We must also hold legal professionals accountable, ensuring that they uphold their duty to fight for their clients’ legal and constitutional rights. Advocacy should not be a selective process based on potential rewards but a consistent commitment to justice for all.

Conclusion

The over 2.5 million people incarcerated in the United States serve as a testament to a system in dire need of reform. Lawyers play a crucial role in this system, and their motivations can significantly impact outcomes. It is time to move away from a profit-driven approach and towards a model of legal representation that genuinely prioritizes justice, fairness, and the protection of constitutional rights. Only then can we begin to address the deep-seated issues that plague our criminal justice system and ensure that it serves all individuals equitably.

Until Next Time…

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

Dwane Cates: P.O.S. Attorney 2

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

In my relentless pursuit of justice, it is imperative to highlight the misconduct and legal violations committed by my former attorney, Dwane Cates. This blog post will detail the specific laws and professional rules he broke during his representation of my case and trial. Understanding these violations is crucial, not just for my case, but for anyone seeking justice and fair representation.

State Bar of Arizona Professional Rules of Conduct Violations

  1. Rule 1.1 – Competence
    • Dwane Cates failed to provide competent representation by not adequately preparing for my defense. His lack of preparation and understanding of the complexities of my case led to inadequate representation, violating Rule 1.1, which requires lawyers to provide competent representation to their clients.
  2. Rule 1.3 – Diligence
    • Rule 1.3 mandates that a lawyer must act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client. Cates neglected important aspects of my case, including failing to investigate key evidence and witnesses that could have exonerated me, thus failing to meet this standard of diligence. He filed no motions in my case on my behalf whatsoever.
  3. Rule 1.4 – Communication
    • Effective communication is critical in legal representation. Cates violated Rule 1.4 by failing to keep me informed about the status of my case and not explaining legal matters in a manner that allowed me to make informed decisions.
  4. Rule 1.7 – Conflict of Interest
    • Rule 1.7 prohibits a lawyer from representing a client if there is a significant risk that the lawyer’s interests or other clients’ interests will materially limit their ability to represent the client. Cates had undisclosed conflicts of interest that compromised his ability to represent me impartially and effectively.

American Bar Association (ABA) Rules Violations

  1. Rule 3.1 – Meritorious Claims and Contentions
    • The ABA Rule 3.1 requires that a lawyer should not bring or defend a proceeding unless there is a basis in law and fact for doing so that is not frivolous. Cates pursued defenses and arguments without a solid factual basis, wasting valuable resources and undermining my defense.
  2. Rule 8.4 – Misconduct
    • This rule prohibits lawyers from engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation. Cates’s actions, including misrepresenting facts and failing to disclose crucial information, clearly violate this rule.

Federal Laws and Constitutional Violations

  1. Sixth Amendment – Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel
    • The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to effective assistance of counsel. Cates’s inadequate preparation, lack of communication, and conflicts of interest resulted in ineffective assistance, directly violating my constitutional rights under the Sixth Amendment.

State Rules of Court Violations

  1. Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 15 – Disclosure and Discovery
    • Rule 15 requires timely disclosure of evidence by both the prosecution and defense. Cates failed to utilize discovery rules effectively, neglecting to obtain exculpatory evidence that could have been crucial to my defense.

Attorney Dwane Cates evinces ineptitude, inadequacy, and incompetence, by a complete and total failure, and looked as if he did not even bother to investigate the State’s case and star witness, Jamil Trevon Curd (JTC), who was arrested 10 times before this case, with at least 25 Phoenix Police Department Incident reports of residential burglary, aggravated assaults, dui, domestic violence, criminal damage, disorderly conduct, 5 arrest warrants, and a pending investigation into the death of Royce Emmett Walker on May 21, 2015. 

“5 arrest warrants, and a pending investigation into the death of Royce Emmett Walker on May 21, 2015 was concealed by Deputy County Attorney Lori Eidemanis of the Maricopa County Attorney Office (MCAO). Dwane Cates failed in his duties completely.”

Ewing redmond Samuels III

The State of Arizona’s case against me was largely constructed on Detective Marchele Miller‘s report, which was rife with omissions and deliberate falsehoods. Despite possessing facts that could have demonstrated my innocence, Miller chose to suppress this crucial information, thereby distorting the narrative and fabricating evidence to fit a predetermined conclusion of guilt. Her actions not only tainted the integrity of the investigation but also played a significant role in the wrongful conviction that followed, highlighting a grave miscarriage of justice. Marchele Miller was arrested on February 23, 2012 by the Chandler Police Department.

Attorney Dwane Cates did not obtain this information to challenge the veracity and truthfulness of her statements at trial and the report she authored, filled with deliberate falsehoods that was easy to refute with facts and evidence. He allowed the word of a corrupt Detective to violate an individual with high government security clearance as a Cyber Security Expert and Analyst.

“Detective Marchele Miller was arrested on February 23, 2012 by the Chandler Police Department.”

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

Federal Statutes and Case Law

  1. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)
    • This landmark case sets the standard for determining ineffective assistance of counsel. According to Strickland, a defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient and that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. Cates’s actions meet both prongs of this test, as his incompetence and neglect clearly impacted the outcome of my case.
  2. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)
    • Under Brady, the prosecution is required to disclose evidence favorable to the defendant. While this is a prosecutorial duty, Cates failed to demand such disclosures aggressively, a failure that compromised my defense.

Conclusion

Attorney Dwane Cates’s conduct during my case and trial was a clear breach of numerous professional and legal standards. His violations of the State Bar of Arizona Professional Rules of Conduct, American Bar Association Rules, Federal Laws, State Rules of Court, and critical case laws such as Strickland and Brady, resulted in the gross miscarriage of justice I experienced. It is my hope that by exposing these violations, I can not only seek redress for myself but also warn others of the potential pitfalls in their pursuit of justice.

Call to Action

I urge those who have faced similar injustices to come forward and share their stories. Together, we can push for accountability and reform within the legal system. For more detailed information and updates on my case, please visit my website regularly.

Until Next Time…

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

Dwane Cates: P.O.S. Attorney

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

An Incompetent Defense and a Conspiracy Against Rights

In the complex and often harsh world of the legal system, the importance of competent legal representation cannot be overstated. Unfortunately, in my case—State of Arizona vs. Ewing Samuels—the very cornerstone of justice was undermined by the ineptitude and incompetence of my attorney, Dwane Cates. His ineffective assistance did not just fall short of acceptable legal standards; it actively contributed to a miscarriage of justice, supported by evidence of collusion with Lori Eidemanis and the Maricopa County Attorney Office.

Dwane Cates: A Breach of Duty

When I was accused of a crime I did not commit, I placed my trust in Dwane Cates, hoping for a robust defense that would uphold my rights and deliver justice. However, throughout the trial, it became evident that Cates failed to meet the basic obligations of his role:

  1. Lack of Preparation: From the outset, Cates demonstrated a severe lack of preparation. He failed to investigate crucial evidence that could have proven my innocence and neglected to interview key witnesses whose testimonies would have been pivotal.
  2. Inadequate Legal Strategy: His legal strategy, if it can be called that, was riddled with errors and glaring omissions. He did not file necessary motions that could have challenged the prosecution’s evidence or highlighted procedural errors, thereby failing to protect my constitutional rights.
  3. Poor Communication: Throughout the proceedings, Cates maintained poor communication with me. Important decisions were made without my input or understanding, leaving me uninformed and unable to participate meaningfully in my own defense.
  4. Criminal Conduct: Dwane Cates had personally asked me to ask JTC’s mother Alisa Michelle Hudson for him to ‘go away’ or leave the State until after the case is over when I met with him at his office on 1747 E. Morten, Suite 205. Phoenix, Arizona 85020 in 2016. I was shocked and looked at him like he lost his mind.
  5. Absolutely No Investigation Into The Facts Thereof: A simple background check into the state’s witness would have shown:

“The State’s case was built on the word of an individual, JTC, who was arrested 10 times before this case, with at least 25 Phoenix Police Department Incident reports, 5 arrest warrants, and a pending investigation into the death of Royce Emmett Walker on May 21, 2015. All concealed by Deputy County Attorney Lori Eidemanis. Dwane Cates representation is questionable all around.”

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

The State’s case was built on the word of an individual, JTC, who was arrested 10 times before this case, with at least 25 Phoenix Police Department Incident reports of residential burglary, aggravated assaults, dui, domestic violence, criminal damage, disorderly conduct, 5 arrest warrants, and a pending investigation into the death of Royce Emmett Walker on May 21, 2015. None of these items were even mentioned in trial, yet the prosecution did its best to impugn my background, even though I was never arrested nor had any criminal history prior to this so called ‘criminal case’. Dwane Cates representation is questionable all around.

“The prosecution (Deputy County Attorney Lori Eidemanis of MCAO) did its best to impugn my background, even though I was never arrested nor had any criminal history prior to this so called ‘criminal case’.”

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

The State of Arizona’s case against me was largely constructed on Detective Marchele Miller‘s report, which was rife with omissions and deliberate falsehoods. Despite possessing facts that could have demonstrated my innocence, Miller chose to suppress this crucial information, thereby distorting the narrative and fabricating evidence to fit a predetermined conclusion of guilt. Her actions not only tainted the integrity of the investigation but also played a significant role in the wrongful conviction that followed, highlighting a grave miscarriage of justice. Marchele Miller was arrestedon February 23, 2012 by the Chandler Police Department.

This report is filled of her racism, deception, propensity for dishonesty, violence, and immoral behavior.

“The Sixth Amendment right to counsel is the right to the effective assistance of counsel, and the benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.”

Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)

Evidence of Conspiracy

What is more alarming than Cates’ incompetence is the emerging evidence suggesting a deliberate conspiracy against my rights (18 U.S.C. § 241). The records indicate that Cates did not merely fail to defend me adequately but actively collaborated with the prosecution Lori Eidemanis and the Maricopa County Attorney Office to ensure a guilty verdict:

  1. Collusion with the Prosecution: There is substantial proof that Cates engaged in backdoor communications with the State Attorney’s Office, discussing strategies that were against my interests and designed to weaken my defense.
  2. Deliberate Sabotage: Specific actions taken by Cates, such as the deliberate suppression of exculpatory evidence and failure to cross-examine key prosecution witnesses effectively, strongly imply that his ineffective assistance was not merely due to incompetence but was a part of a concerted effort to ensure my conviction.
  3. Violation of Constitutional Rights: This conspiracy against rights is a severe violation of my legal and constitutional protections. The right to effective counsel is enshrined in the Sixth Amendment, and the deliberate denial of this right constitutes a grave injustice.

“The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office has a long history of paying witnesses to testify and commit perjury, nondisclosure, and collusion with defense attorney’s, as they call it give me the case and I’ll throw you a bone here and there.”

Ewing R. Samuels III

The Path to Justice

The wrongful conviction and subsequent imprisonment were a direct result of Dwane Cates’ incompetence and the malicious collusion with the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office. This case is not just about one individual’s failure but a systemic abuse that requires accountability and redress.

Moving Forward

  1. Legal Action: I am committed to pursuing all legal avenues to overturn this unjust conviction and to hold those responsible accountable for their actions. This includes filing for post-conviction relief based on the ineffective assistance of counsel and exploring civil actions for the conspiracy against my rights.
  2. Public Awareness: Sharing my story is crucial. By exposing the details of this case, I aim to shed light on the broader issues within the justice system, advocating for reforms that will prevent others from suffering similar fates.
  3. Advocacy for Reform: My experience underscores the need for systemic changes. Advocacy for stricter oversight of legal counsel performance and greater transparency within prosecutorial conduct is essential to protect the rights of all individuals.

Conclusion

The ordeal I faced due to Dwane Cates’ incompetence and the malicious conspiracy against my rights is a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities within our legal system. My fight is not just for personal justice but for a more equitable system where such injustices cannot occur. Through continued legal action and raising public awareness, I am determined to seek justice and ensure that my case serves as a catalyst for necessary reforms.

To reiterate, these are not just Sixth Amendment violations, but are criminal violations under Federal laws. As they say, “no one is above the law”.

For more details about my case and ongoing efforts, please stay tuned as I dissect my case from beginning to present. Join me in advocating for justice and accountability.

Until Next Time…

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

Invisible Scars: The Toll Of Imprisonment And Its Lifelong Impact

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

Imprisonment is a harsh reality for many, but its effects extend far beyond the prison walls. The psychological trauma endured during incarceration can have profound and lasting impacts on an individual’s mental health, life outcomes, and overall outlook on life. This blog explores these effects, supported by statistics from reputable government agencies, and underscores the urgent need for reform and support for those reentering society.

Mental Health Effects of Imprisonment

Imprisonment often exposes individuals to a range of stressors, including isolation, violence, murder, torture, and a lack of autonomy. These conditions can lead to various mental health issues, such as:

  1. Depression and Anxiety: According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, more than half of all prison and jail inmates in the U.S. have a mental health problem, with depression and anxiety being among the most common issues.
  2. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): The National Institutes of Health (NIH) reports that 21% of prisoners have experienced PTSD, stemming from traumatic events during incarceration.
  3. Substance Abuse Disorders: Many inmates struggle with substance abuse issues, which are often exacerbated by the prison environment. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) found that around 58% of state prisoners and 63% of sentenced jail inmates meet the criteria for drug dependence or abuse.

The Adverse Impact on Life Outcomes

The effects of imprisonment are not confined to the time spent behind bars. They extend into every aspect of an individual’s life post-release, influencing their social, economic, and psychological well-being.

  1. Employment and Income: Former inmates face significant barriers to employment. The Bureau of Justice Statistics indicates that two-thirds of released prisoners were not employed within five years of their release. Those who do find work often earn significantly less than their peers, perpetuating a cycle of poverty.
  2. Education: Imprisonment can disrupt educational pursuits. Data from the U.S. Department of Education shows that only 14% of prisoners have some college education, compared to 48% of the general population.
  3. Recidivism: Mental health issues and lack of support can lead to high recidivism rates. The National Institute of Justice reports that within five years of release, about 76.6% of released prisoners are rearrested.

My Personal Journey

As someone who has experienced the full brunt of the prison system, I can attest to the deep and lasting impacts it has on one’s mental health and overall life. My name is Ewing Redmond Samuels III. Born in Belize City, Belize, in 1978, I emigrated to the United States as a child and built a life there, only to have it upended by a wrongful and unlawful conviction. After serving 6.5 years in the Arizona Department of Corrections and additional time in federal custody, I was deported back to Belize in 2023.

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) defines deportation or forcible transfer of a population as a crime against humanity. The ICC is located in The Hague and prosecutes individuals accused of crimes against humanity, which are serious violations committed against a civilian population. Deportation is defined as the displacement of people across an international border. Forcing people to leave their place of residence through expulsion or other coercive acts for reasons not permitted by international law could be a crime against humanity, a war crime, or both. The 15 forms of crimes against humanity listed in the Rome Statute include offences such as murder, rape, imprisonment, enforced disappearances, enslavement – particularly of women and children, sexual slavery, torture, apartheid and deportation.

Rome Statute of The International Criminal Court

Even though I now live in the paradise of the tropical Caribbean, the shadows of my incarceration linger. I struggle daily with a multitude of personal and professional challenges. The trauma has not only affected me but has also profoundly impacted my son, leaving us both grappling with lifelong scars.

Despite my 20 years of experience as a software engineer in Silicon Valley, and my extensive background as a business consultant and music and film producer, reintegration has been an uphill battle. The stigma of my past and the psychological toll of my experiences continue to pose significant hurdles.

Outlook on Life

The psychological toll of imprisonment can fundamentally alter an individual’s outlook on life. Feelings of hopelessness, mistrust, and social withdrawal are common among former inmates.

  1. Hopelessness and Despair: Prolonged exposure to the harsh conditions of prison life can lead to chronic feelings of hopelessness and despair, which can hinder reintegration efforts.
  2. Mistrust and Social Withdrawal: Many former inmates develop a deep-seated mistrust of others and often withdraw from social interactions. This isolation can prevent them from building the social support networks necessary for successful reintegration.
  3. Stigma and Discrimination: The stigma associated with a criminal record can lead to social and institutional discrimination, further alienating former inmates and diminishing their sense of self-worth.

The Need for Reform and Support

Addressing the mental health needs of inmates and providing comprehensive support post-release is crucial for improving life outcomes and reducing recidivism. Here are some steps that can make a difference:

  1. Mental Health Services: Increasing access to mental health services in prisons and jails can help mitigate some of the adverse effects of incarceration.
  2. Educational and Vocational Training: Providing inmates with educational and vocational training can improve their employment prospects post-release.
  3. Support Networks: Establishing robust support networks, including counseling, mentorship programs, and community support, can aid in the reintegration process.

Conclusion

The mental health effects of imprisonment are profound and far-reaching, influencing every aspect of an individual’s life post-release. By understanding these impacts and advocating for comprehensive reform and support, we can help former inmates rebuild their lives and contribute positively to society. I have seen more than I care to admit in the United States and the American criminal justice system, and now question the so called authorities in control of”law and order”.

Until Next Time…

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

The Phoenix Police Department: Abuse of Power

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

The Dark Underbelly of Phoenix: Uncovering Police Misconduct

In the sprawling metropolis of Phoenix, Arizona, a city known for its desert landscapes and vibrant culture, there lies a darker underbelly—a system marred by corruption and abuse of power. At the forefront of this injustice stands the Phoenix Police Department (PPD), an entity entrusted with upholding the law but often found guilty of violating it.

22 Arizona Police Officers Punished So Far In 2024

In a year marked by heightened scrutiny of law enforcement, Arizona’s Peace Officer Standards and Training Board (AZPOST) has taken action against misconduct within the state’s police force. With 37 investigations opened since August, including cases of officers asking suggestive questions to minors and threatening individuals with deadly force, the board has suspended or revoked certifications for 22 officers. Notable cases include Mesa officer Clinton Bertola’s inappropriate interrogation of high school girls and Gilbert Police Officer Andrew Neves’ use of excessive force. These actions underscore AZPOST’s pivotal role in holding officers accountable and safeguarding public trust in law enforcement, emphasizing the need for ongoing reform and oversight.

On a personal note, I wrote a letter to AZPOST and sent them the evidence needed of an arrest record and criminal history of Detective Marchele Miller in 2019, at present still I’ve heard nothing yet.

Arizona’s Law Enforcement Accountability: AZPOST Probes 20 More Cases of Police Misconduct in 2023

Arizona’s law enforcement watchdog, the Arizona Peace Officer Standards and Training Board (AZPOST), has intensified its scrutiny of police conduct, opening investigations into 20 new cases of misconduct since March. Allegations include excessive force, bungled investigations, and instances of domestic violence, reflecting a disturbing trend within the state’s police force. Notable cases involve a trooper ordering his police dog to bite individuals and a Tempe officer tasing an unarmed man 13 times. AZPOST’s role in holding officers accountable underscores the importance of transparency and oversight in maintaining public trust in law enforcement.

Arizona Police Misconduct: 17 Officers Under Investigation for Various Offenses in 2023

Marked by a string of troubling incidents, the Arizona Peace Officer Standards and Training Board (AZPOST) has opened investigations into 17 cases of police misconduct. Among the allegations are excessive force, DUIs, reckless driving, and instances of dishonesty. These cases shed light on internal investigations often kept from public view, ranging from a state trooper’s controversial TikTok videos to a small-town police chief’s DUI arrest. Despite heightened scrutiny, AZPOST’s decisions on disciplinary actions remain pivotal, with some high-profile use-of-force cases resulting in no further action taken.

DATABASE OF DECERTIFICATIONS OF ‘DIRTY COPS‘ FROM AZPOST:

Arizona-DecertificationsDownload

Concealed Crimes: Detective Marchele Miller’s Hidden Past

One even more outrageous example of this misconduct is the case of Detective Marchele Miller, whose own criminal history and arrest record were conveniently concealed from both the public and the defense in a court of law. This deliberate act of deception not only undermines the integrity of our justice system but also raises serious questions about the credibility of those tasked with enforcing the law. Obtaining indictments and testifying in trials, with a known criminal history and arrest record of deception and lying, this kind of officer is a clear and present danger since February 23, 2012.

DetectiveMarcheleMillerCHAR-1Download

Operating Under the ‘Color of Law’: The PPD’s Abuse of Authority

The concept of operating under the ‘color of law‘ is not unfamiliar to the PPD. It refers to the misuse of power, typically by government officials, to deprive individuals of their constitutional rights under the guise of enforcing the law. In the case of Detective Marchele Miller, her actions epitomize this abuse of authority, as she exploited her position to suppress vital information that could have potentially exonerated innocent individuals. Ironically, the federal statute requires a 5-20 year prison sentence for this kind of violation.

Phoenix’s Police Oversight Agency Struggles Amid City Interference

The Office of Accountability and Transparency (OAT) in Phoenix faced internal challenges as city officials undermined its independence, leading to the resignation of its director, Roger Smith. Despite public claims of robust oversight, documents reveal city officials’ efforts to control OAT’s operations, including blocking the hiring of an experienced attorney, Catherine Bowman. Smith’s departure highlighted ongoing tensions between city leadership and efforts for meaningful police accountability.

Phoenix Police Chief Defends Force Amidst Fatal Shooting

Amidst an orchestrated media campaign by Phoenix Police Chief Michael Sullivan defending the department against federal oversight, officers shot and killed a man, marking the second fatal police shooting in six days. The city’s pushback against a Justice Department investigation into use of force highlights ongoing tensions between law enforcement and calls for accountability. Yet, interesting that a so-called Law Enforcement Officer in leadership does not recognize the ‘supreme Law of the Land’ of the Federal Government, but believes that he and the PPD can subjugate those in the City Of Phoenix to local laws with severe pains, penalties, and punishment inducing a life of trauma and tragedy.

DOJ Launches Investigation into Phoenix Police Misconduct

The U.S. Department of Justice initiates a comprehensive probe into the Phoenix Police Department and the city of Phoenix over allegations of misconduct, including excessive force and retaliation against protesters. Attorney General Merrick Garland and Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke announced the investigation, which will scrutinize various aspects of police conduct, including use of force, discriminatory policing, and treatment of individuals experiencing homelessness. The probe follows a series of controversies, including a crackdown on protests and a high number of police shootings, raising concerns about civil rights violations and accountability within the department.

Just recently the FBI arrested a Phoenix police officer on April 5 for allegedly receiving and possessing thousands of images and videos of child pornography. Gilbert resident Alaa Robert Bartley, 41, was indicted three days later by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Arizona. He was charged with one count of receiving child pornography and one count of knowingly possessing child pornography.Bartley faces a sentence of five years to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000 on the receiving charge. The possession charges carry a maximum sentence of 10 years, or 20 years if the pornography depicts a minor who is not yet 12, as well as a fine of up to $250,000.

Pursuing Justice: Advocating for Reform

But my pursuit of justice does not end with exposing the misconduct of the PPD; it extends to holding those responsible accountable for their actions. Through my legal human rights advocacy, Premise GSE, I aim to shed light on the injustices perpetrated by the PPD and advocate for meaningful reform within the department.

Join the Fight: Standing Up Against Injustice

Transparency and accountability are the cornerstones of a fair and just society. By shining a spotlight on the actions of Detective Miller and others like her, we can begin to dismantle the culture of impunity that has long plagued the PPD. It is time to demand accountability from those sworn to protect and serve, and to ensure that justice is truly blind. As I continue to fight for my own rights and seek redress for the injustices I have endured, I invite others to join me in holding the Phoenix Police Department accountable. Together, we can strive towards a future where the law is upheld with integrity and fairness, and where no one is above the law, not even those sworn to enforce it.

Until next time,

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

Belizean Government’s Failures: A Call for Accountability

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction: Recognizing the Pattern

As a proud Belizean, it pains me deeply to witness the continuous neglect and incompetence displayed by our government in fulfilling its responsibilities to protect and serve its citizens. From the tenure of George Price, our first Prime Minister, to the present day, the pattern of leadership failures remains apparent, leaving many of us disillusioned and frustrated.

Healthcare Crisis: Lives Hang in the Balance

One of the most glaring examples of this negligence is the state of our healthcare system. Despite promises of improvement, many Belizeans still lack access to adequate medical care, leading to unnecessary suffering and loss of life. Basic infrastructure, equipment, and staffing shortages plague our hospitals and clinics, leaving citizens vulnerable and underserved.

On a personal note, I suffered 2nd and 3rd degree burns to both my legs about 2 months ago. I was taken to the Karl Heusner Memorial Hospital and treated at the Emergency Room. Maybe because it was a Saturday night, I was treated immediately and taken care of with such great hospitality that I was overwhelmed with gratitude. My E.R. bill was $0, other than the prescriptions. I myself could not believe it. I know if I was in the United States, my bill would have been around $25,000.00 USD. Below are the images of my legs.

I suffered 2nd and 3rd degree burns and was rushed to the Karl Heusner Memorial Hospital.

Treatment of antibiotic, ibuprofen and lots of aloe vera. (No Opiates)

My skin color is even coming back as if I never had a burn injury.

Education System: Failing Our Future Generations

Furthermore, the education sector has been a victim of chronic underinvestment and mismanagement. Our children, the future of Belize, are deprived of quality education due to inadequate resources and substandard facilities. It’s disheartening to see the potential of our youth stifled by a system that fails to provide them with the tools they need to succeed.

Economic Stagnation: Opportunities Lost

Economic opportunities are also limited for many Belizeans, particularly those in rural areas. Despite our abundance of natural resources, unemployment rates remain high, and poverty persists. The government’s failure to implement sustainable development initiatives and support small businesses exacerbates these socioeconomic challenges, leaving many families struggling to make ends meet.

Corruption and Trust Deficit: Undermining Democracy

Additionally, concerns about corruption within the government persistently undermine public trust and confidence. Allegations of bribery, embezzlement, and nepotism tarnish the integrity of our democratic institutions and hinder progress towards a more just and equitable society.

As a response to this pressing issue, my company, Skyview A.I. GSE, has developed an innovative artificial intelligence technology called Oversight. This groundbreaking application utilizes advanced algorithms and data analytics to monitor behaviors within government agencies, identifying potential instances of corruption or unethical conduct among public officials.

Oversight serves as a vital tool in holding government employees accountable for their actions, promoting transparency and integrity within our democratic processes. By leveraging the power of artificial intelligence, we aim to combat corruption and restore public trust in our institutions, paving the way for a more accountable and ethical governance framework.

Conclusion: Demanding Change

It’s time for accountability. We cannot continue to accept mediocrity from our leaders while our country languishes in neglect. As citizens, we must demand transparency, integrity, and genuine commitment to the common good from those in positions of power.

While the road ahead may seem daunting, I remain hopeful that Belizeans will come together to demand the change we deserve. By holding our leaders accountable and actively participating in the democratic process, we can strive towards a brighter future for Belize.

Let us not forget the words of George Price himself, who famously said, “Independence is not a gift. Independence is a challenge.” It is time for us to rise to that challenge and demand better for our beloved Belize.

“Independence is not a gift. Independence is a challenge.”

George Cadle Price

I Am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

Embracing China’s Ascent: Navigating the 21st Century’s New Landscape

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

“No amount of media propaganda can change the reality that the 21st Century belongs to China.”

Ewing r. samuels III

The 20th Century: America’s Era of Dominance

Reflecting on history, it’s evident that the 20th century belonged indisputably to the United States. With its economic prowess, military might, and cultural influence, the U.S. dominated the global landscape, shaping the world in its image.

China’s Meteoric Rise

As we stand on the precipice of a new era, it’s becoming increasingly clear that the dynamics of power are shifting, and the winds of change are blowing in China’s favor. China’s rise has been nothing short of meteoric. In just a few decades, it has transformed from a primarily agrarian society into an economic juggernaut, boasting the world’s second-largest economy.

Challenging the Media Narrative: Myth versus Reality

But what about the media narrative that often portrays China’s rise as a threat to the established world order? Let’s call it what it is: propaganda. Yes, there are legitimate concerns and challenges that come with China’s ascendance, including issues of human rights, geopolitical tensions, and economic competition. However, it’s crucial to put these concerns into perspective. And remember the ‘established world order‘ is not for the benefit of all, but a chosen few.

A History of Hypocrisy: Lessons from the Past

When we examine history, it’s essential to acknowledge that no nation is without fault. The United States and the United Kingdom, for example, were never initially feared as threats, yet they introduced slavery (Afrikans), genocide (Native Americans), torture (prisoners), wars with nuclear bombs (Hiroshima and Nagasaki), and nefarious activities against sovereign peoples. In contrast, China has no history of such actions on a global scale.

Personal Reflection: My Experience in the Global Context

As someone who has experienced the complexities of global power dynamics firsthand, I can attest to the fact that neither I nor my family have ever been violated by any Chinese individuals in my entire lifetime. My case serves as a reminder that geopolitical tensions should not overshadow the shared humanity that binds us all.

In the I.C.E. facility (CORE CIVIC) in Eloy, Arizona, I witnessed hundreds of Chinese, Afrikans, and Middle Easterners being violated, only because of being from ‘elsewhere‘. I became friends with a Chinese man, named Mr. Shue, only because I speak a little Mandarin-Chinese, and the facility for the U.S. government provided him no translator for assistance. I told the facilities supervisor that Mr. Shue had diabetes numerous times, and they ignored him countless times, until he had a ‘code red’ on the recreation field, dealing with 115 degree Arizona heat.

Mr. Shue died in Eloy, Arizona in 2023.

Embracing Change: Opportunities for Collaboration

Instead of succumbing to fear-mongering and xenophobia, we should recognize the inevitability of China’s rise and seek to understand its implications. Embracing China’s emergence as a global powerhouse opens up a world of opportunities for collaboration, innovation, and progress.

Shaping a Collective Future

As we look ahead, it’s essential to acknowledge that the 21st century is not a zero-sum game. China’s rise does not automatically spell the decline of the United States or any other nation. Rather, it signals a shifting paradigm in which multiple powers coexist and cooperate on the world stage.

Conclusion: Building a Harmonious World

In conclusion, the 21st century belongs to China, just as the 20th century belonged to the United States. No amount of media propaganda can change that reality. But instead of fearing this change, let’s embrace it as an opportunity to build a more interconnected, prosperous, and harmonious world.

Thank you for joining me on this journey of exploration and discovery. Until next time…

I am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III

The Purpose of Government: Upholding Integrity in the Face of Corruption

 150 150 vprxncte
By:
0

Introduction

As citizens, we entrust our governments with the solemn responsibility of safeguarding our rights, ensuring justice, and promoting the common good. However, what happens when those entrusted with power betray that trust? When corruption festers within the corridors of authority, it not only erodes the foundation of democracy but also undermines the very purpose of government itself.

The Core Purpose of Government

Throughout history, governments have been established to serve the people, to provide for their welfare, and to maintain order in society. The social contract between citizens and their government is based on the mutual understanding that power will be wielded responsibly and in the best interest of all.

The Impact of Corruption

Yet, when officials succumb to the temptations of corruption, when they prioritize personal gain over the well-being of their constituents, the fabric of society begins to unravel. Corruption breeds mistrust, cynicism, and disillusionment among the populace. It perpetuates inequality, stifles economic growth, and undermines the rule of law.

The Tactic of “Divide and Conquer”

Moreover, when corruption is allowed to thrive unchecked, it often employs the insidious tactic of “divide and conquer.” By pitting communities against each other, by sowing seeds of discord and resentment, corrupt officials seek to maintain their grip on power. They exploit divisions along lines of race, class, religion, or ideology, weakening the collective strength of the people.

Demanding Accountability and Transparency

In the face of such challenges, it falls upon the shoulders of conscientious citizens to demand accountability and transparency from their government. We must hold our elected representatives accountable for their actions, and we must insist on reforms that strengthen democratic institutions and root out corruption at all levels of government.

Upholding Values of Governance

Transparency, accountability, and integrity must be the guiding principles of governance. Only by upholding these values can governments fulfill their true purpose: to serve the people, protect their rights, and promote the common good.

A Case of Institutional Betrayal

Consider the recent case in Phoenix, where the former Maricopa County prosecutor, April Sponsel, falsely indicted innocent protesters with gang-related charges in 2020. This egregious abuse of power not only resulted in the wrongful persecution of individuals exercising their right to protest but also tarnished the reputation of the justice system.

Sponsel’s actions, characterized by a “disturbing pattern of excessive charging,” led to her dismissal from the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office in June of 2022. Her failure to review available evidence and her refusal to acknowledge any wrongdoing demonstrate a blatant disregard for justice and integrity. And yet, it was the Maricopa County Attorney Office who bred, nourished and trained her how to do what she was doing, until caught red-handed.

This is the same exact office that obtained an indictment, took me to trial and convicted me on hearsay, fabricated evidence, perjury, subornation, covered-up the kidnapping of my son, covered-up the murder of Royce Emmett Walker on May 21,2015, fraudulent concealment of impeachment and exculpatory evidence and deliberate and intentional violations of due process, and way too many to list here. People’s lives are being damaged by corrupt officials in the State of Arizona.

Where is the federal government in all of this when a state authority commits state abuse of power?

Below is an ORDER of what April Sponsel did and the “sanctions” delivered by the Judge:

sponsel-decision-and-order-imposing-sanctions-pdj-2023-9018Download

The suspension of Sponsel’s law license for at least two years is a testament to the far-reaching and deleterious consequences of her actions. As noted by the presiding judge, her misconduct damaged morale within the office and painted it as lacking integrity. This betrayal of trust not only undermines the public’s faith in the justice system but also perpetuates a culture of impunity among those in power.

Conclusion

As we navigate the complexities of the modern world, let us remain vigilant in our commitment to justice and democracy. Let us strive to build a society where the purpose of government is not overshadowed by corruption, but rather, where it shines brightly as a beacon of hope and progress for all.

I am,

Ewing Redmond Samuels III