Introduction
The NSO Group, an Israeli cybersecurity firm, has faced intense global scrutiny for its flagship spyware, Pegasus, a tool originally developed for tracking and apprehending criminals and terrorists. Instead of being limited to its intended use, Pegasus has become a potent weapon used by governments worldwide to conduct surveillance on journalists, human rights defenders, political opponents, and activists. This pervasive misuse represents a significant violation of international human rights laws and raises concerns about global privacy, sovereignty, and the ethical boundaries of surveillance.
What is Pegasus?
Pegasus is a sophisticated spyware capable of infiltrating smartphones and other digital devices without the user’s knowledge. It can extract messages, emails, contact lists, photos, and even audio and video recordings. This spyware has zero-click capabilities, meaning it can install itself on a device without the target even interacting with a malicious link or message. Pegasus has been sold to multiple governments and security agencies under the claim of protecting national security, yet it has been repeatedly weaponized against civilians.
Countries Using Pegasus for Surveillance
Evidence and investigations have uncovered that several countries across the globe have used Pegasus for unlawful surveillance, violating fundamental human rights. Here are some notable examples:
- Saudi Arabia: The use of Pegasus in the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi drew international outrage. Investigations revealed that Saudi authorities used Pegasus to monitor Khashoggi’s associates before his death .
- Mexico: Mexico is one of the largest buyers of Pegasus. Journalists, activists, and political opponents have been targets, particularly those investigating governmental corruption and the country’s war on drugs .
- India: In 2021, a massive scandal broke when it was revealed that Pegasus was being used on opposition leaders, journalists, and activists in India. This led to calls for a judicial investigation .
- Hungary: In Europe, Hungary stands out as a notorious user of Pegasus, targeting journalists and lawyers critical of the government .
- United Arab Emirates: The UAE has also been accused of deploying Pegasus to monitor dissidents and human rights activists both domestically and abroad .
These are just a few examples, but reports show that Pegasus has been employed in over 40 countries, targeting thousands of individuals, many of whom were not involved in any criminal activity.
U.S. Embassies and Global Espionage
Everywhere there is a U.S. embassy, there is the potential use of Pegasus spyware on sovereign governments. U.S. embassies, though primarily seen as diplomatic outposts, are also hubs for intelligence gathering. Reports suggest that Pegasus spyware, or similar technologies, may be employed as part of surveillance activities conducted under the veil of diplomatic immunity. Sovereign governments are increasingly finding their political and private conversations compromised, often without realizing they are being surveilled by foreign actors with the backing of powerful intelligence agencies.
Violations of International Law and Human Rights
The international community has established clear laws and norms to protect privacy and human rights, including the right to freedom of expression, the right to privacy, and the right to security. Pegasus violates these basic tenets in the following ways:
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), Article 12: States that no one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with their privacy, family, home, or correspondence. Pegasus spyware blatantly contravenes this provision by allowing unauthorized access to individuals’ most private information .
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), Article 17: Recognizes the right of individuals to be protected from unlawful or arbitrary surveillance, further condemning the misuse of Pegasus to monitor innocent individuals .
- European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), Article 8: Provides for the right to respect for private and family life. European countries using Pegasus, such as Hungary, are violating these protections.
Ethical and Legal Concerns
The widespread use of Pegasus not only disregards international legal frameworks but also represents a broader trend where authoritarian regimes and even democratic governments bypass fundamental rights to suppress dissent. Surveillance of this magnitude has led to arrests, intimidation, and even murders of those seeking to expose corruption or push for reforms.
In many cases, governments hide behind national security justifications to deploy this technology. However, the reality is that once spyware like Pegasus is in use, it becomes a tool of control, censorship, and suppression.
Conclusion
NSO’s Pegasus has become a symbol of the dangerous overlap between technology, surveillance, and power. While it was developed to combat terrorism and criminal activities, its use has been far from noble. Countries worldwide, in conjunction with intelligence agencies—often with support from the U.S. and other powerful entities—have weaponized this technology to infringe on sovereignty, privacy, and fundamental human rights. The question remains: How long will the international community tolerate this unchecked global espionage?
In this era of increasing digital surveillance, it is vital to advocate for stronger oversight, stricter international regulations, and transparency regarding the sale and use of spyware like Pegasus. Without accountability, the misuse of Pegasus and similar tools will continue to erode the freedoms we all hold dear.
Until Next Time…
I Am,
Ewing Redmond Samuels III
Citations: