Introduction
Prosecutorial misconduct is not just a flaw in the American judicial system—it is a pervasive and systemic problem that undermines the very principles of justice. This misconduct often goes unchecked, allowing prosecutors to abuse their power without facing accountability. The implications of this unchecked power are not merely domestic but also touch on international law, where such abuses constitute serious violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms. When these violations occur, it is the duty of international authorities to intervene, ensuring that those responsible are held accountable for their actions.
The Prevalence of Prosecutorial Misconduct
In the United States, prosecutorial misconduct has reached alarming levels. Instances of prosecutors suppressing evidence, presenting false testimony, and coercing witnesses are far too common. These actions directly contribute to wrongful convictions, which have destroyed countless lives. According to the National Registry of Exonerations, over 3,300 people have been exonerated in the United States since 1989, with many of these cases involving prosecutorial misconduct. Despite the frequency of these occurrences, few prosecutors are ever held accountable, creating an environment where misconduct is normalized.
The Case of Lori Eidemanis: A Personal Account
In my own case, Lori Eidemanis, a prosecutor in the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office (MCAO), willfully violated my rights. Despite clear evidence of my innocence, Eidemanis chose to pursue a conviction, engaging in practices that blatantly disregarded my constitutional rights. Her actions were not an isolated incident but part of a larger pattern of misconduct within the MCAO, an office that has a long history of abusing its power.
Eidemanis’s actions in my case, including the deliberate presentation of false evidence and suppression of exculpatory information, are clear violations of my rights under both U.S. and international law. The lack of accountability she has faced is a stark example of the systemic issues within the American judicial system. This pattern of behavior suggests that Eidemanis has likely violated the rights of others as well, raising serious concerns about the integrity of prosecutions within Maricopa County.
The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office: A History of Abuse
The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office is notorious for its misconduct. The office has been implicated in numerous cases where prosecutors have overstepped their bounds, often with devastating consequences for the accused. This office’s actions are not just isolated incidents but part of a deeply ingrained culture of corruption and abuse. For decades, the MCAO has been accused of manipulating the legal system to secure convictions, often at the expense of justice and fairness.
This consistent pattern of abuse raises the question: Can the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office be considered a terrorist organization? When a government entity systematically violates the rights of its citizens, engages in practices that terrorize the innocent, and operates with impunity, it fits the definition of a terrorist organization. The MCAO’s actions over the decades have inflicted terror and suffering on countless individuals, making a strong case for this designation. The MCAO can be designated as a”Domestic” terrorist organization based upon the very language of the Department of Justice and the laws as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States.
“The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 gave the Secretary of State authority to designate foreign terrorist organizations whose terrorist activity threatens the security of United States nationals or the national defense, foreign relations or economic interests of the United States. See Pub. L. 104-132, § 302, 110 Stat. 1214, 1248. See also section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. § 1189). The Antiterrorism Act also created 18 U.S.C. § 2339B, which makes it unlawful, within the United States, or for any person who is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States anywhere, to knowingly provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization that has been designated by the Secretary of State. See Pub. L. 104-132, § 303, 110 Stat. 1214, 1250.”
– Department of Justice
International Law and the Need for Accountability
Under international law, particularly the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which the United States is a party, the actions of these prosecutors constitute serious violations of human rights. Articles 9 and 14 of the ICCPR guarantee the right to a fair trial and protection from arbitrary detention—rights that are routinely violated by rogue prosecutors in the U.S.
The principle of non-derogation in international law means that certain rights, such as the right to be free from torture and the right to a fair trial, cannot be suspended under any circumstances. When state actors engage in practices that violate these non-derogable rights, they are committing crimes that warrant international intervention. The unchecked power of prosecutors like Lori Eidemanis, and offices like the MCAO, is a clear nexus of violations of international law, calling for global accountability measures.
A Call for International Action
The time has come for international authorities to take decisive action against these abuses. The International Criminal Court (ICC) and other global institutions have a responsibility to investigate and issue arrest warrants for state actors who engage in such egregious violations of human rights. The evidence is clear: prosecutors across the United States are not only violating domestic laws but are also breaching international norms.
The silence and inaction of the international community in the face of these abuses only embolden these rogue actors. By holding these individuals accountable on an international stage, we can begin to restore faith in the rule of law and ensure that justice is served for all.
Conclusion
Prosecutorial misconduct in the United States is a crisis that demands immediate attention. The actions of individuals like Lori Eidemanis and institutions like the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office are not just local or national issues—they are violations of international law that have far-reaching implications. It is imperative that the international community steps in to hold these state actors accountable, ensuring that the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals are protected. Only through such measures can we hope to curb the rampant abuse of power and restore true justice.
Until Next Time…
I Am,
Ewing Redmond Samuels III
